• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Any Bored Programmers Out There?

Started by ScoobyDoo, Feb 10, 05:32 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ScoobyDoo

We need a coder to program something that will take a matrix for dozens (7-spins wide) to determine how many of the same dozen will line up vertically in any colume such as:

3 2 2 1 2 1 3
2 1 2 3 1 2 3
1 2 3 2 2 1 3
2 1 2 1 3 2 3<---The last colume has four in a row

We are interested in learning how many times a group of three and groups of four and higher happen.

If some of you are interested, please contact Twisteruk or Johnlegend in the thread:

MATRIX VERTICAL METHOD ONLY

Could really use your help.

Scooby Doo

albalaha

Dear Scooby,
           Why did u start one topic in two names in two sections? I can see same topic in coding for roulette too.

superman

Quoteto determine how many of the same dozen will line up vertically in any colume

Already done scooby, it happens too often, the losses eat the profit at the expected rate over time, some wont believe and carry regardless.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

Bayes

I'm afraid so. The chance that a dozen will be the same as the one immediately above is just 12/37. Arranging the way past outcomes are shown cannot possibly have an effect on the long-run expectation.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

superman

Thought I would just run it again for you scooby, the collapse came within 90 spins

[reveal] A | B | C | C | A | C | z
B | B | B | A | A | C | C
A | C | C | C | B | C | A
A | A | B | B | B | B | C
C | C | A | A | B | A | B
C | C | A | A | B | B | B < col 5 first loss trigger
B | A | A | A | C | C | A
A | C | C | B | A | C | B
B | A | C | B | C | C | A < col 6 start betting
z | C | B | B | C | C | C
A | A | A | C | C | C | A
A | B | A | A | C | C | C
C | B | B | B | A | C | A < col 6 oops
A | C | A | A | B | B | C
C | B | A | B | B | A | C
C | B | B | A | A | A | A [/reveal]

RNG can't be beaten by visual stimulation
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

Twisteruk

Quote from: superman on Feb 11, 04:05 AM 2011
Thought I would just run it again for you scooby, the collapse came within 90 spins

[reveal] A | B | C | C | A | C | z
B | B | B | A | A | C | C
A | C | C | C | B | C | A
A | A | B | B | B | B | C
C | C | A | A | B | A | B
C | C | A | A | B | B | B < col 5 first loss trigger
B | A | A | A | C | C | A
A | C | C | B | A | C | B
B | A | C | B | C | C | A < col 6 start betting
z | C | B | B | C | C | C
A | A | A | C | C | C | A
A | B | A | A | C | C | C
C | B | B | B | A | C | A < col 6 oops
A | C | A | A | B | B | C
C | B | A | B | B | A | C
C | B | B | A | A | A | A [/reveal]

RNG can't be beaten by visual stimulation


I don't see Five Vertical Quads in a row anywhere here ?


Remember is Five separate Quads in a row, Vertically, one after the other that kills us


IF a Trip becomes a Quad you wait for the next Trip. You ignore the Quad that just happened (for betting purposes)



I've highlighted the winner


A | B | C | C | A | C | z
B | B | B | A | A | C | C
A | C | C | C | B | C | A
A | A | B | B | B | B | C
C | C | A | A | B | A | B
C | C | A | A | B | B | B < col 5 first loss trigger
B | A | A | A | C | C | A
A | C | C | B | A | C | B
B | A | C | B | C | C | A < col 6 start betting
z | C | B | B | C | C | C
A | A | A | C | C | C | A
A | B | A | A | C | C | C
C | B | B | B | A | C | A < col 6 oops
A | C | A | A | B | B | C
C | B | A | B | B | A | C
C | B | B | A | A | A | A

Its Set In Stone =)

chrisbis

I take it then, that this new game is more like playing:-


ANTI-QUADS?

Betting against a Quad forming eh?

(I've been out of the loop on this baby.)

Twisteruk

Quote from: chrisbis on Feb 11, 04:58 AM 2011
I take it then, that this new game is more like playing:-


ANTI-QUADS?

Betting against a Quad forming eh?

(I've been out of the loop on this baby.)


Thats what the Vertical Matrix is all about mate  ;D !!

Its Set In Stone =)

Bayes

Quote from: Twisteruk on Feb 11, 04:46 AM 2011

I've highlighted the winner


A | B | C | C | A | C | z
B | B | B | A | A | C | C
A | C | C | C | B | C | A
A | A | B | B | B | B | C
C | C | A | A | B | A | B
C | C | A | A | B | B | B < col 5 first loss trigger
B | A | A | A | C | C | A
A | C | C | B | A | C | B
B | A | C | B | C | C | A < col 6 start betting
z | C | B | B | C | C | C
A | A | A | C | C | C | A
A | B | A | A | C | C | C
C | B | B | B | A | C | A < col 6 oops
A | C | A | A | B | B | C
C | B | A | B | B | A | C
C | B | B | A | A | A | A

There is a vertical line of 7 Cs, but at what point would you have stopped betting for the line not to continue?
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Twisteruk

Quote from: Bayes on Feb 11, 05:23 AM 2011
There is a vertical line of 7 Cs, but at what point would you have stopped betting for the line not to continue?

On the 4th step

You only bet it once.
Its Set In Stone =)

-