*PATTERN 4*

[Kingspin]

How come i am winning week in week out with this superb system then red nickers. 

Try playing it on a wheel and see you much you win before posting negative stuff... 

[jon86]

How come I am winning week in week out with this superb system then red nickers. 

Try playing it on a wheel and see you much you win before posting negative stuff... 

Its true!
In my tests it wins to.
But its not any reason to it why it wins its just random.

But if win its all good  and all sould be glad.

Cheers

Jon

[amk]

Play pattern 4 on dozens

Instead of 8 different patterns there are 27 different patterns

Playing two dozens each time in 3 step progression.

Loss would be -26  for progression of 1-1, 3-3, 9-9,

Any thoughts out there, JohnLegend??

[Johnlegend]

Play pattern 4 on dozens

Instead of 8 different patterns there are 27 different patterns

Playing two dozens each time in 3 step progression.

Loss would be -26  for progression of 1-1, 3-3, 9-9,

Any thoughts out there, JohnLegend??

I already covered that one AMK with scooby we called it DECODER 3. The trouble is it can take half a year to get down to the final pattern. Played PATTERN 4 Style, might be worth testing.

What I have to make clear is PATTERN 4 and PATTERN BREAKER will more or less match their expected hit rate played consecutively. Played hit and run style its a different ball game. EXAMPLE play PATTERN 4 consecutively and you will typically win five or six times then lose.

Played the way I play get used to winning streaks in excess of 20 in a row. It becomes a certain winner longterm. I've been trying to get this across for a year now on this forum.

You may NEVER see a winning streak anywhere near 30 in a row it you play long sessions. I have 3 winning streaks of more than 40 in a row played HIT AND RUN. And double losses are non existent.

I will say this clear, play P4 as I do and you will ABSOLUTELY beat this game for the rest of your life. WHO WANTS TO BE A 1 PERCENTER? Bring patience to the game and you are there.

[paul2007]

Hello Johnlegend.      .      .       :)

I been trying this system for a while now, and its a winner!  But play to long, like you said, and you can lose.      .      .       :(

Can you tell me exactly how you play, progression and for how long and how many times a day!

I also been playing it with dozens and collums, and had top results, but again, I think I play to long and lose, and then play catch up!

Whats your progression? 1,2,4  or 1,3,7 and what do you do if you lose? Do you up progression or start again?

I noticed at the beginning on first post, you played 3 lines of 3, but flicking through it went 4 lines wide.       I was playing high low, odd even and red black at the same time for three games only, winning max 9 units.     .     .      But keep going back for more.      I really would like to know how long and what way the creator of this plays this system.     .     

And I always look through your posts and systems on here, and would like to know, which one is the one you think is your  best!!!

Cheers  

[Red Nickels]

There is no such thing as "hit and run."  what do you think, that playing a certain amount of spins intermitently is different than playing any other amount of spins continuously or not?  nevermind, happy winnings, I will even test your system on my real spins if I have time, or you can do it-- you can find the download in Reply 25 of "The Manilla System" which is about 15 systems down the list of full systems.  but you will probably come up with some tweaks that will work with those spins.  the only way you could accurately test is to pretend you sat down after the 1st spin, after the 2nd spin, after the 3rd spin, etc.  because obviously you could arrive at any time during any sequence of spins.  which is why "hit and run" makes no sense...

[maestro]

There is no such thing as "hit and run."  what do you think, that playing a certain amount of spins intermitently is different than playing any other amount of spins continuously or not?  nevermind, happy winnings, I will even test your system on my real spins if I have time, or you can do it-- you can find the download in Reply 25 of "The Manilla System" which is about 15 systems down the list of full systems.  but you will probably come up with some tweaks that will work with those spins.  the only way you could accurately test is to pretend you sat down after the 1st spin, after the 2nd spin, after the 3rd spin, etc.  because obviously you could arrive at any time during any sequence of spins.  which is why "hit and run" makes no sense...

numbers of the real spin feom manila topic came winer for pattern breaker4 and pattern filler where you play for missing sequence to come...pattern breaker loses

[Johnlegend]

There is no such thing as "hit and run."  what do you think, that playing a certain amount of spins intermitently is different than playing any other amount of spins continuously or not?  nevermind, happy winnings, I will even test your system on my real spins if I have time, or you can do it-- you can find the download in Reply 25 of "The Manilla System" which is about 15 systems down the list of full systems.  but you will probably come up with some tweaks that will work with those spins.  the only way you could accurately test is to pretend you sat down after the 1st spin, after the 2nd spin, after the 3rd spin, etc.  because obviously you could arrive at any time during any sequence of spins.  which is why "hit and run" makes no sense...

The winning streaks prove theres a difference. Not a SINGLE WINNING STREAK of 20 or more with continuos play. With hit and run I have 13 streaks of at least 20. Its all about when you enter the cycle.

[Johnlegend]

Hello Johnlegend.      .      .       

I been trying this system for a while now, and its a winner!  But play to long, like you said, and you can lose.      .      .       

Can you tell me exactly how you play, progression and for how long and how many times a day!

I also been playing it with dozens and collums, and had top results, but again, I think I play to long and lose, and then play catch up!

what's your progression? 1,2,4  or 1,3,7 and what do you do if you lose? Do you up progression or start again?

I noticed at the beginning on first post, you played 3 lines of 3, but flicking through it went 4 lines wide.       I was playing high low, odd even and red black at the same time for three games only, winning max 9 units.     .     .      But keep going back for more.      I really would like to know how long and what way the creator of this plays this system.     .     

And I always look through your posts and systems on here, and would like to know, which one is the one you think is your  best!!!

Cheers  

For Pattern 4 I play for one win, and shut it down. I use multiple levels and start in the middle. I will post all my results and staking soon. WHY DOES HIT AND RUN WORK?

It works simply because you are more likely to win your FIRST GAME many times over than win a multiple play session. Call it luck whatever there is simply no denying that a method like P4 will produce winning streaks played hit and run, that DEFY the true strikerate the law of averages dictates should be your slice of the win loss pie.

Of course you can have two close losses playing hit and run, but when you hit that streak it will go on and on. And even playing at a one level progression of say 2,4,8. You will show a profit. USING MULTI LEVEL STAKING. You simply are assured profit.

And because double losses are rare playing hit and run you can snatch back at least half your loss on the very next game. Then carry on accumulating further profits, so its always one step backwards, three steps forward  with this method.

[Cash83]

John,

can i use this P4 in RNG fast play mode (without spinning)?

[Johnlegend]

John,

can I use this P4 in RNG fast play mode (without spinning)?

I dont recommend playing RNGs they are not roulette. If they were a good method would beat them as it does a real wheel. That said the only chance you have of beating them is hit and run before they read you like a bestseller.

[XXVV]

You raise a really interesting yet fundamental point Red Nickels.

In questioning whether "hit and run" differs in the long term from continuous play,  you are sceptical that there is a difference.

John has made it very clear in several posts that his evidence in real live play roulette (not RNG) demonstrates that he has achieved long streaks of wins in his results by playing for ONE HIT in a game then quitting.

He has also stated that the point of entry is critical.

Thus entry and exit points need to be carefully defined.

John has mentioned that in continuous play such relatively frequent streaks of 20+ would be unlikely and that in the longer view the expectation of equilibrium or cancelling out of profit would be satisfied. This is even allowing for exclusion of zero (tax). The wins would simply balance out the losses.

Yet in a history of results of hit and run strategy with the above conditions met (and a suitable handling of zero) a sound net profit results, according to John.

I believe the reason for this, and it is fundamental to the true nature of roulette, and fundamental if we are to be winners, is that there is an eternal battle that rages in the sequence of outcomes from the roulette wheel.

The battle is a fight between the forces of Deviation ( Ecart), and the forces of Balance ( Equilibre).

Depending on the size of the window through which we view these outcomes the two forces may be at different poles, and one may be dominant over the other.

In the bigger picture we know that equilibrium has mastery through the mysterious ways of balance and what appears to be some sort of memory.
Even hard headed Statisticians have confided to me over this latter phenomenon. 'Transparent Mathematics' appears to acknowledge this also.

Deviations (deviation standard) appears to diminish the bigger the sample, to say less than 1% in a sample of 100,000 spins.

By contrast in the short cycles, the deviation, the Ecart, dominates. This is the opportunity we can seize.

It seems only a very few really understand this and use this to their advantage consistently.

As brilliant European theorists have stated "the problem to play the losing bets with small units, and the winning bets with large units, remains unsolved, but it is possible to ride the winning streaks with large units and the losing streaks with smaller bets".

That approach is really another subject, and one where there has been fascinating work. However the essence here is that by selecting the right time to enter and to exit as soon as possible after a first hit the player is keeping that window of opportunity as small as possible and thus is reducing the risk of increased exposure to the corrective balancing forces which would neutralise any gain.

In other words hit and run.

Hit after a suitable trigger and get out after the first win. If the method, such as this one (or others like it) is simple and short cycle in exposure then the scales will tip in the favour of the smart player.

There is still the risk of short term loss but it is reduced, and by effective money management, can be quickly controlled.

It just requires a style of play that is the opposite of gambling.

[Kingspin]

The pattern 4 is at the top , personally i think it is the probably the best system i have played to date.  I have to rate it 9.5 0ut of ten. I  have won buckets full of money so far with it.

[shakeel]

The pattern 4 is at the top , personally I think it is the probably the best system I have played to date.  I have to rate it 9.5 0ut of ten. I  have won buckets full of money so far with it.

Kingspin can you please tell me that how you are playing this method ?   

[Johnlegend]

The pattern 4 is at the top , personally I think it is the probably the best system I have played to date.  I have to rate it 9.5 0ut of ten. I  have won buckets full of money so far with it.

I think PATTERN 4 is a gem. I had a winning streak of 32 in a real casino over 3 days. Once you have won a 100 times you can never relinguish your BR. Playing as I do I have never lost twice in a row. Using a losing even playing continuosly double losses are infrequent.

You play this and Scoobies DIVIDE AND CONQUER in a real casino, you go home a winner EVERYTIME, not 4 times out of five.

Dont be a gambler, Know you are going to win. MV5, P4, PATTERN BREAKER, DIVIDE & CONQUER. What more do you want? I only have one method left to share on this forum. Ill tell you all, and from there you either realize what you have before you right here or you carry on flitting from method to method but never really getting anywhere making any real money. I will be using the aforementioned methods extensively over the coming years and to a point of annoyance to the casinos.