Your Opinion Please.....

[MrJ]

I play alot at DublinBet (practice money). I only play a two number method and YES OF COURSE, I am doing quite well. Come on, its one zero, who cant win? (lol)

As some know, there is table #1 and table #2. What I do......after a win, I then switch to the OTHER table and start over fresh. After that win, I switch back again etc.


My question.....do you consider that a FAIR assessment of a method OR its more impressive if I only play at the SAME table/wheel?

Ken

[MrJ]

Let me add this in as well. I keep a close eye on all my testing. Playing my method on only one of the wheels, I get pretty good results over hundreds of trials.

Take the SAME method and switch back and fourth, back and fourth after every win and I get MUCH BETTER results over hundreds of trials......same method mind you. A coincidence? I just dont know.


Ken

[Juiced91]

Maybe a 100 spins on each table then switch. I dont see why it should make a dif. If it wins it wins. Weird that alternation makes a dif.
And if it wins changing or on the same table it still WINS.

[RouletteExplorer]

do you consider that a FAIR assessment of a method OR its more impressive if I only play at the SAME table/wheel?


Changing tables or not changing its the same thing. Nothing changes.
Randomness is adding the outcomes no matter if we are changing tables or if we let some time till the next bets.

[MrJ]

do you consider that a FAIR assessment of a method OR its more impressive if I only play at the SAME table/wheel?


Changing tables or not changing its the same thing. Nothing changes.
Randomness is adding the outcomes no matter if we are changing tables or if we let some time till the next bets.

I agree, it should NOT make a difference, however, in the case of THIS method and my wins, it does make a difference. Trust me, I must of posted 100 times before, with any method, you'll get roughly the SAME results regardless of switching or not but now here I am, scratching my head. As soon as I get that win (all flat betting), I switch over to the other table.....get that win (it might be for a profit, perhaps not) ......I switch back etc. Interesting so far.

Ken

[Wally Gator]

Good point, Ken.  You've shown that in the real world it is possible to consistently win using your BRAIN .....  there are many of us out here with the same philosophy.   I'd be interested to hear about your real play .... are you looking to move between tables, and would they be the same 2?

[MrJ]

Good point, Ken.  You've shown that in the real world it is possible to consistently win using your BRAIN .....  there are many of us out here with the same philosophy.   I'd be interested to hear about your real play .... are you looking to move between tables, and would they be the same 2?

I dont physically move, its on-line (DublinBet). Would I switch around at a real casino? I'm not sure. Once I get comfortable..... 

I am/was a huge believer in NOT switching tables but now I'm 'lost', not too sure.

Ken

[Skakus]

So are you saying if you stay on the same table after a win, that your loss rate goes up and/or your bet rate goes down?

Sorry, I don't know the system you're using. After a win do you start a fresh chart, or can you back track and perhaps get another bet immediately?

Could it be that on the second table you are jumping into a bet that already started some spins back? That could increase your win rate a bit.

[MrJ]

"Could it be that on the second table you are jumping into a bet that already started some spins back? That could increase your win rate a bit" >>> that's possible, its all I can narrow it down to. Maybe because of virtual bets (saving money), I'm jumping into a method in mid-stride. I find it odd as hell.

Silly U.S. laws, GIVE ME DUBLINBET OR GIVE ME DEATH!!! 


Ken

[Skakus]

Maybe because of virtual bets (saving money), I'm jumping into a method in mid-stride.

The mid-stride thing is a bit of a fallacy, but I'll bet if there were 2 MrJs the second one would not be happy that the first one kept coming over to his table and winning on a bet that he has been losing on for many spins.

[casino guide]

It's weird. have you recorded which table you win most? i think the other table is biased and the other is fair.

for those people who know someone got addicted to gambling or can't control him/herself to gamble, there's an article in my blog about gambling problems. might help.

thanks,
dead-mans-hand.blogspot.com

[joiner29]

hi mrj show us your method and we will give it a try as well

[RouletteExplorer]

I am/was a huge believer in NOT switching tables but now I'm 'lost', not too sure.

what you are expiriencing right now is a random (good fluxuation) insident.
It could be exactly the opposite....that when you would change tables more losses would occure and sticking to the same table less losses to occure......It just happened.
Even if after 1.000.0000 beting spins ur system is still UP, the changing tables will have nothing to do with it....it will just show that ur system is effective.

[Proofreaders2000]

"what you are expiriencing right now is a random (good fluxuation) insident"--RouletteExplorer

I agree.  On paper there is no change.  The odds are still the same.

With that said, if you are winning more on one table than the other I'd say the dealer at the new table isn't doing his/her job. 

[MrJ]

hi mrj show us your method and we will give it a try as well

I'm not trying to be like Hotspot, dont worry. I still have one or two 'bugs' to work out.

I was playing it again last night at DublinBet. Switched tables after every win, worked like a charm. The win could be on the first spin or a win after 18 spins is a loss (only betting 2 numbers).

Ken