OPPOSITE of Sidney One-A Three Outcome Trend Even Chance System

[RouletteExplorer]

This is the OPPOSITE way of play of a system that a member posted.(plus some tweaks)

So  we are looking at the 3 last outcomes and we see the colours.
If we have 2of the same and 1 alone we are betting the 1 that is alone
If we have 3 of the same we bet the opposite one.

Progression +1 on a lose  - 1 on a win.

In every new profit we reset to 1 chip.
If we need less chips to be in a new profit than the progression suggests , then we are minus the chips.....e.g.. we are -2 and progression stage say to bet 5 , then we are betting 3 chips in order to be +1(new profit.

Here is the testing grapg I did in 781 spins we have +172 profit.
This also proves that the original way of the system that this member posted can t work....
I am not sayng that the opposite way can sure works , but if the opposite is winning, then the original is losing.



It would be nice if a programer could code this system to give a fast and big test
thanks

[Nathan Detroit]

This  method is  also called "Intermediate Equalization of Even Chances" and was mentioned by "WINKEL" and being  discussed  several years ago  at the  PAROLI  Roulette Forum.

I did  play this  method in a B & M casino and the  croupier wa NOT too happy. The reason being I had chosen  to  give  action to all EC , B/R   O/E H/L.

Some  action !!!

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

[Nathan Detroit]

This  IEEC  method  is  a rather good  way  to play as long as  one  selects only 3 dominants.
Following all 6 EC  is self defeating and not worthwhile  considering.

Occasionally a  player might find himself sitting out  a few spins while  waiting for  the next opportunity.

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!

[amk]

I only try to help everyone RoletteExplorer..........

625 games played 1 loss, I have to report.........

[Nathan Detroit]

Roulette Explorer ,

This  is  a very sound method you  have brought to our attention. The reason being that  it is  entirely based  on  the 50/50 expectations of the EC as long as one stays with only one of each category   as I have   already stated  in a previous post
.
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

N.D.

[Robeenhuut]

This is the OPPOSITE way of play of a system that a member posted.(plus some tweaks)

So  we are looking at the 3 last outcomes and we see the colours.
If we have 2of the same and 1 alone we are betting the 1 that is alone
If we have 3 of the same we bet the opposite one.

Progression +1 on a lose  - 1 on a win.

In every new profit we reset to 1 chip.
If we need less chips to be in a new profit than the progression suggests , then we are minus the chips.....e.g.. we are -2 and progression stage say to bet 5 , then we are betting 3 chips in order to be +1(new profit.

Here is the testing grapg I did in 781 spins we have +172 profit.
This also proves that the original way of the system that this member posted can t work....
I am not sayng that the opposite way can sure works , but if the opposite is winning, then the original is losing.



It would be nice if a programer could code this system to give a fast and big test
thanks

Hello RX

Yeah its good method. I play something very similar but i start betting with 3 units and
decrease or increase by 1 if i win or lose respectively. I also posted here other similar system when you reset after 3 bets. I bet EC and usually follow the last decision for max 4 steps.
The most crucial  thing here in order to be steady in profit is to set your stop loss and win target.  I usually stop my session when 10-15 units ahead and if 25 units down.
Its very difficult to recover if deeper in the hole
Its a grind sometimes but if you are satisfied with winning 20 or 30 units in 4 sessions this might be something for you.

Regards

[Nathan Detroit]

I would  like to add that if we  have  3  of the  same EC e.g. R-R-R then one  could chose from  3  options:

a.)betting with the RUN

b.) betting against the RUN

c.) Sitting out several spins.


HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

N.D.

[Robeenhuut]

I would  like to add that if we  have  3  of the  same EC e.g. R-R-R then one  could chose from  3  options:

a.)betting with the RUN

b.) betting against the RUN

c.) Sitting out several spins.


HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

N.D.

Hello

I usually go with the flow here But this is of course just a guessing game.  If  MM and stop-loss are done properly you stand as a good chance of winning as in any other good system. You  will lose here quite often but should make a steady profit.
Yesterday i saw 3 DS hit 17 times in row.Things happen.  I don't like fancy systems. They all lose sooner or later.
Here you get out at a set stop-loss and have a very good chance of recovering in next sessions.

Regards

[Tsi Nan Fu]

Option " c'  would be  the preferred one . The  reason being that it would not deviate  from the original   intermediate equalization scenario.

Tsi- Nan- Fu