• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

HYBRID DC4

Started by warrior, Apr 18, 09:35 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

warrior

I will present a system that i have played for a year, superior to code 4 and divide and conquer,for those who like to play this style, i have tested this for 5000 games never lost butyou never no,and played for the last year never lost. until later muchachos.

Nickmsi

Bring it on . . .  will love to test it.    Nick
Don't give up . . . . .Don't ever give up.

dino246

Sounds GREAT !!
Will hold-off going to my local 2 casinos in Bournemouth until i see YOUR system.
Dino.

joiner29

bring it on warrior cant wait
tom

Big EZ

Sounds interesting.....

The important question: is this flat betting or does it use a progression
Quitting while your ahead is not the same as quitting

warrior

As we all know there is no such thing as holy grail, this would probably lose long term what ever that means, but  i manage to take some money from the casinos not million or even thousands just enough to win ,for every one is different,is it a flat well thats totally up to you and a ballistic progression is out of the ?2 up on a lose1 down on a win is ok, i found that with 5 unit win im done go home,i know that every one including me were fed up with all these matrix systems ,but this is the only one i use i have tried all of them ,i dont like to wait to long for triggers like the code 4 but the divide and conquer offerd more of betting opportunity but found it did lose more  then the rules showed, anyways i put together this hybrid dc4, up till now it has not been done on the forum my results are good and hope yours are too enjoy warrior.                                 

warrior

system
    you begin to track down the dozens and the columns together just like the divide and conquer sytem ,the only differens is we add the columns with the dozens ,like this.
                     

begin always with.................   1a     2b     3c
   
next we fill in those groups just like code4.alternating dozens and columns.as the numbers come in.ex dozen 1 comes in mark it, next spin column c mark it nex to dozen 1 ok clear.
                  ex. 1a1c          2b3a      3c1a- from here we wait for the next spin so we can  start betting so lets say the next 4 spins are 2a3c we put 2 is our trigger so we jott it down under the 2b3a our first bet is against the b column if you lose bet against the 3rd dozen and if you lose bet against column a ,that's the first part so now it starts to look like this.




                1a1c          2b3a           3c1a
                                2a3c
 
if you win the first bet keep filling in the matrix until you have all 4 complete,next 4  spins 1b3c  our trigger is always the dozens so it will look like this bet against a1c ok.



            1a1c             2b3a          3c1a
            1b3c             2a3c   
             
  just like divide and conquer and code 4 but i put them together ,the only difference is in code 4 you track for 12 spins and then bet that the forth line does not repeat the first line this hybrid gets you betting continoulsy the only difference if you win the first bet you wait 2 spins before betting again, big deal but we don't fall asleep,let continue  next 4 spins 2b3c.


          1a1c              2b3a           3c1a
          1b3c              2a3c
                              2b3c
in all these bets i won on the first spin,here is the most important part when the bet repeats its self  you lost 3 in a row great go home ,just joking ,we stop all betting but we keep tracking the bets and keep putting the dozens and columns under there appropriate  columns. we start to bet when the the column that repeated gets the trigger for the second time, this is where this idea is different i think it has not lost 2 in a row .ex next 4 spins 3c1a this is our repeat.
         
           1a1c            2b3a           3c1a
           1b3c            2a3c           3c1a here we lose 3 in row so now we wait unit the 3rd dozen trigger.              2b3c      3a2c here we win on the 4th spin.


what i do to make it safer i wait for the first match then i go in for 2 spins ,in case of a repeatim not losing 3 in a row but only 2 but then i wait for the next trigger and betting for only 5 spins instead of 6. man i hope i expained it clearly .2 in row under the same column never seen but that means nothing played real money always walked out with 5 units ,there you have it have fun and good luck.warrior   
                             

peauke

like your system,

made some test with live spins (only +/- 250 spins, will test more) and looks promissing. Have one question, what do we do when zero hits within the first 6 spins, do we skip and look for the next number.

And if a zero comes up when we are tracking, say you have this:
1A2C     2B3A      3B3B
and then zero comes up, do wait for next number to look for the corresponding dozen or do we wait 3 spins after zero (so total of 4 spins).

trying to win some on roulette with a 5 year plan

warrior

21 13 17 33 30 12 33 7 15 7 15 7 8 6 27 9 14 32  26 35 29 32 27 27 this is a session from today won 5 adios.just to give more ex.they all won on the first spin.



   1a2a    2b2c    3c3c
   
             2a1c     3a2a
                       
                        3c2b
                         
                        3b3b
                         
                        3c3b   

atlantis

Quote from: warrior on Apr 19, 08:36 AM 2012
21 13 17 33 30 12 33 7 15 7 15 7 8 6 27 9 14 32  26 35 29 32 27 27 this is a session from today won 5 adios.just to give more ex.they all won on the first spin.

   1a2a    2b2c    3c3c
   
             2a1c     3a2a
                       
                        3c2b
                         
                        3b3b
                         
                        3c3b   

Hi warrior. Looks interesting. Ok. I fully understood how you are playing from those numbers given - but what is your staking plan arrangements? Thanks.
Here is my session:
Quote
36 9 25 13 23 28 3 34 5 18 6 17 31 15 27 15 27 19 36 27 2 17 29 29

1a3c           2b3a           3c2a
1a1c                             3c3a
1b3c                             3c1b
                                    3b3c
w2nd
w1st
w2nd
w2nd
w1st
+5. Exit
I used the 1-1, 3-3, 9-9, 27-27 standard prog   

Regards,
A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

Nickmsi

 Hello Warrior . . .


Just did a quick 50 test run of this hybrid and it started out well winning a lot of 5 units but unfortunately it quickly it the solid ice wall in the Game of Thrones.


Attached is my spreadsheet tracker showing the a loss of 53 units.  I used a standard 3 stage progression of 1-3-9 for a maximum loss of 26.


You can play around with this and try other progressions or flat betting but in the end, this is another “event” based system that will lose in the long run.


It was enjoyable testing it and please keep thinking of new ideas, especially, the “out of the box” types, the more different the better.


Nick

Don't give up . . . . .Don't ever give up.

warrior

big A  ex, 1a2c   2b3a   3c2c
                       2b2c here we have a repeat on b ,in the rules i said if you want to make it safer wait for a repeat, then bet 2 times in that line ,just in case the line repeats for 4 spins then wait for that line to trigger again then bet for 3 more spin total of 5 spins i have never gone that far 2 in row losses i have not encounterd yet ,so if i use this variation i will do a 1 3 9 27 if i lose on the forth i take the loss start over but this time i do not wait for a repeat,i bet on the next trigger a try to recoup. if you want to bet every spin jus a 1234 1 unit down on a win or until even or possitive.

warrior

Quote from: Nickmsi on Apr 19, 11:49 AM 2012
Hello Warrior . . .


Just did a quick 50 test run of this hybrid and it started out well winning a lot of 5 units but unfortunately it quickly it the solid ice wall in the Game of Thrones.


Attached is my spreadsheet tracker showing the a loss of 53 units.  I used a standard 3 stage progression of 1-3-9 for a maximum loss of 26.


You can play around with this and try other progressions or flat betting but in the end, this is another “event” based system that will lose in the long run.


It was enjoyable testing it and please keep thinking of new ideas, especially, the “out of the box” types, the more different the better.


Nick
what in the world are you playing1a 2b 3c where are all the the numbers that go under each colums re read the rules your not playing 1a 2b 3c every spin.

warrior

nickmsi are familiar with divide and conquer and code 4 ?

atlantis

Quote from: warrior on Apr 19, 11:54 AM 2012
big A  ex, 1a2c   2b3a   3c2c
                       2b2c here we have a repeat on b ,in the rules i said if you want to make it safer wait for a repeat, then bet 2 times in that line ,just in case the line repeats for 4 spins then wait for that line to trigger again then bet for 3 more spin total of 5 spins i have never gone that far 2 in row losses i have not encounterd yet ,so if i use this variation i will do a 1 3 9 27 if i lose on the forth i take the loss start over but this time i do not wait for a repeat,i bet on the next trigger a try to recoup. if you want to bet every spin jus a 1234 1 unit down on a win or until even or possitive.

Thanks warrior,

36 9 25 13 23 28 3 34 5 18 6 17 31 15 27 15 27 19 36 27 2 17 29 29

1a3c           2b3a           3c2a
1a1c                             3c3a
1b3c                             3c1b
                                    3b3c

Ok. Same game I played but this time waiting for a second repeat (for the extra safety as you advised)

w1st
w1st
w1st


+3

Obviously I must play on further to get the 2 matches first in the groups to achieve a 5 units target - but who cares if it takes longer -  as it DOES seem much safer?

I like your idea of up1; down1 stake pattern.

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

-