Jubilee System

[buffalowizard]

Here's one that I am going to work through the
vittoriosa actuals with. So simple, but little risk and
with sound money management could be profitable.


Wait for 2 numbers and bet that these dozens don't
repeat for a further 2 spins.


progression is 1,3


Let's see how it fares. Leave a session after 3 wins, or 3 losses.




33


29


31


20   W


11


34


10


24  W


25


28


4   W  (won session)


31


32


14  W


20


4


33  W


10


34


14  W  (won session)


26


32


33


1    W


33


32


36


8    W


3


23


30  W   won session


14


36


32  W


18


34


12   W


15


3


22


6     L


19


12


14


27   W   (won session)


7


36


27   W


2


18


13   W


9


18


21   W   (won session)


7


34


33   W


12


1


22   W


17


32


32   W   (won session)


0


19


14


25  W


8


21


16   W


etc  to be continued........

[buffalowizard]

Followed on from previous post:


25


15


16     W     (finish session) +3


30


30


25


31     L


15


31


14


34    L


23


22


13


23    L    (lost session)   -12


3


28


16    W


33


8


15   W


22


23


15


3      W   +3


14


13


17


13     L


9


18


2


32   W


15


20


29   W     -1


8


35


6


19    W   


10


0


23


23   W


7


28


0


13   W    +3


3


14


15   W   


10


25


23   W


8


28


5


28   L     -1


33


1


3    W


0


6


24


31   W   


13


20


17


5    W    +3


32


9


3    W


33


23


31


2    W   


3


16


3


18    L     -1


19


0


36


29    W


36


14


16   W


13


24


24


29   W   +3


15


25


14


16   W


11


34


25   W


35


33


36


12   W   +3


3


17


6


9    W


5


3


8


15   W


10


32


1


27   L   -1


6


18


10


8     W


8


28


31   W


29


8


11   W  +3


4


32


29    W


27


34


22    W


0


19


17


9     W   +3




More soon.......

[Drazen]

This is very similar to my i think 2nd posted system, when i just started thinking about this game


And yes, it can be interesting indeed


Cheers


Drazen

[buffalowizard]

Hi drazen.

I know it is amateurish in its simplicity
But I am a strong believer in setting your
Own limits and keeping it low risk. This is just testing and I'm intrigued to see how it does with these actuals.

[Drazen]

Of course, when limits/goals are padded at the right way, we can do pretty much


And we people very often like to complicate, so much underestimating simplicity!


Everything should be kept simple as possible!


Regards


Drazen

[buffalowizard]

Here's further testing...




25


30


2        W


6


36


14      W


26


35


20     W  +3


21


35


4       W


10


35


22    W


18


14


16


21    L


26


25


29


30   L


22


7


32   W


14


8


35   W   -5


30


16


32


18   L


25


11


23   W


30


13


5     W


20


13


7     W   +3


31


28


19    W


3


26


15   W


19


2


3     W   +3


0


14


26


2     W


26


35


14   W


29


29


3     W    +3


19


13


33    W


21


19


15


33   W


13


35


1     W    +3


34


7


30


6      L


3


26


30    W



11


18


34   W


7


0


29


7


24   W   -1




Running Total   -   +34

[buffalowizard]

17


32


18


20     W


20


32


26    W


27


3


29


12     L


31


3


15    W    -1


14


31


1      W


13


31


4      W


28


13


35


6     W    +3


18


0


3


21


16   W


9


31


16    W


2


27


18    W   +3


14


21


32    W


21


31


35    W


34


10


15    W    +3


16


29


8     W


12


16


0


26   W


7


11


32    W   +3


2


28


21    W


3


16


29    W


6


32


9


17    W   +3

[buffalowizard]

If any of you out there fancy supplying me with some of your own
50-100 spin sequences so I can test against different sets of
numbers.


Much appreciated!


BW

[buffalowizard]

Still trundling along!




25


23


20     W


4


4


21     W


15


25


35    W   +3


8


18


19    W


24


20


18


14     L


16


6


26    W


21


19


27    W    -1


28


27


26


20    W


15


27


0


32    W


26


35


31


5      W    +3


5


27


6


12     W


30


30


30


2      W


30


34

33


34     L


20


29


14


8       W   -1


31


19


29


28     W


9


15


24     W


24


17


22


9      W   +3


22


33


10   W


22


27


16


14   W


13


34


24


1     W   +3


11


29


13   W


3


32


9


5     W


15


12


20


1      L


6


5


6


11    L


15


31


22


4     W    -5




Running total    +53

[buffalowizard]

Last one tonight, and still holding strong.


Remember, could be used as hit and run depending
on your unit size for +3 and then leave.




4


36


34       W


32


1


16       W


7


28


19       W       +3


22


18


20


25     W


12


22


11


15    L


10


7


26    W


11


28


24    W   -1


1


11


33   W


8


25


21   W


11


4


32    W   +3


1


10


19   W


13


5


30   W


18


36


1     W   +3


14


12


32   W


25


4


23    W


1


9


10


7       L


18


28


28    W    -1


7


24


16    W


13


13


3      W


30


23


21     W  +3


17


6


4       W


24


16


27     W


0


3


12


36    W    +3




RT   +66

[Still]

@buffalowizard

Very interesting.  I notice that sometimes there are two spins between bets, and sometimes three. Besides a zero intervening, what determines that?

Regards

Still

[wolfat]

@buffalo,
I'm sorry but could you explain your BS in detail? sometimes I found your plays contradictory...
tx

[buffalowizard]

Wolfat, Still,


I seem to have got too carried away with testing.


Here's a better explanation. It's a 2 dozen bet basically.


So you wait for two spins first.


Example:


30


16


Dozens 3 and 2 right...


Now we bet that these won't come out in that order again in the next 2 spins.
So next bet would be dozens 1 and 2.


22 comes out and we get a win first time out. Now we wait for another two
'trigger' spins, such as


10


8


So dozens 1 and 1 again


So we bet dozens 2 and 3


12 comes out - that's a loss of 1 unit. Our progression is a two step 1, 3 so we bet once more with 3 units.


36 comes out, and we get a win.


Here's a small sequence as it probably highlights it better:


23
10  <we have our two trigger dozens to bet against
12  <here we bet against dozen 2 (23). This is a WIN  +1
34 
23  <we have our two trigger dozens to bet against
26  <here we bet against dozen 3 (34). This is a loss
4    <here we bet against dozen 2 (23). This is a WIN  +2
10
20  <we have our two trigger dozens to bet against
17  <bet aginst dozen 1 (10) WIN  +3


Etc.


I'd like to add also that each session ends on either 3 wins (+3) or 3 losses (-12)
There are obviously different combinations you get to achieve this. You could get either
1 loss and 3 wins (-1) or 2 losses and 3 wins (-5). So far, the wins have outstripped the
losses.


Any questions welcome


Cheers


BW

[wolfat]

Tx Buffalo,
it's clear now....

[buffalowizard]

Sorry guys,


made a schoolboy error with staking.


1,3 is in fact 2,6 isn't it because it's layed over 2 dozens.


Therefore, it will not work out.


bummer