I found thread in VlS forum ...

[Master_of_pockets]

link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=1037.msg9105#msg9105

[MrJ]

Okay.....anything to add? (It is from 2008)

Ken

[Evollution]

I dont believe in software anymore

[Master_of_pockets]

Evollution this way of playing has nothing to do with betting softwares LoL

MJ and the others:

I posted this thread(as I found it by serfing around forums) because this MIN. sectors INTERVAL could be an other calculation that can be added in any future systems...
   I don t think a winner can be made from it , because if it could , TG would have gound it in 2008 and he wouldn t posting in forums after 2008....
  But it was something that I had never seen in here (min interval) and this is why i posted it...to give new ideas.

[warrior]

Whats the point of having new ideas when for you nothing wins with flat betting or progression.

[Robeenhuut]

what's the point of having new ideas when for you nothing wins with flat betting or progression.

Hola Warrior

Nothing wrong with new ideas. Flat or prog. Lets test them.  Maybe....

[Bayes]

I don't believe in software anymore

I think I saw some the other day. Can't be sure though, maybe it was a trick of the light.

[speed]

what's the point of having new ideas when for you nothing wins with flat betting or progression.

I agree that the RNG or no biased, tilted wheel can not be beaten with a flat bet , but maybe it's can be beaten with some specific positive progression (rise bet when u win) with stages.

[Robeenhuut]

Evollution this way of playing has nothing to do with betting softwares LoL

MJ and the others:

I posted this thread(as I found it by serfing around forums) because this MIN. sectors INTERVAL could be an other calculation that can be added in any future systems...
   I don't think a winner can be made from it , because if it could , TG would have gound it in 2008 and he wouldn t posting in forums after 2008....
  But it was something that I had never seen in here (min interval) and this is why i posted it...to give new ideas.

It reminds me bit of parachute bet idea. It has some theory behind it but its still bit of random which i like  But i would not bet on single numbers here or lines.  Streets or corners are ok.
But its just a hunch.  No testing done.

[warrior]

Hola Warrior

Nothing wrong with new ideas. Flat or prog. Lets test them.  Maybe....

Im all for new ideas,the point is that in mops eyes nothing is good so why continue with your search.

[Master_of_pockets]

I have always said not to recycle the old losing ideas.
I have said many times try and think about new ideas and explore them.

[Robeenhuut]

I have always said not to recycle the old losing ideas.
I have said many times try and think about new ideas and explore them.

This one is a bust. But i like the concept.

[6th-sense]

pretty much caught my eye this topic...i,ve been playing with this since it was posted and what is interesting is that when all min interval hits 1 then for me its time to start betting..
the way i,m  looking at is when the spins last appeared column matches the max interval column then bet that it won,t hit for the next spin only..i,m using ec,s..dozens and columns and n6,s ie 2 lines..up to now i,m testing with good results...i don,t know if to flat bet or progress yet as its early doors in testing but flat seems good at moment...also if you  get  any of with  misses over 15  its worth resetting game and starting again as its quite a long wait to try and get a match on that amount of misses again
the actual getting to min interval to 1 won,t work in pratice but the elasticity of the max interval column and spins last hit column seems to have more merit.
any other thoughts would be appreciated...