• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

CHALLENGE FOR ALL--must see and participate if you wana be winner-Yes SAM,it can

Started by F_LAT_INO, Aug 03, 11:54 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

TwoCatSam

ig

I remember nothing about a missing split.  What post # was that in?  I accidentally left out a split.

FLATman

While I love my "TwoCat Redneck FLATman Tracker" I think I found an easier way to track it  Requires two rolls of cash register paper.

:xd:

Samster
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

ignatus

"After a loss update the tracking then switch to betting on the 9 missing splits, not the last 9 hit splits." ?
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

VegasArick

IG, there are 18 possible splits...

If you were betting on the 9 newest splits to appear when a loss came.

Then the next spin calls for a bet on the 9 Other / missing splits that you were NOT betting on the previous spin.
We are born "broke"
We will die "broke"
Everything in between is "flucuation" !

ignatus

OK. This method doesn't work for online casinos (not live) it seems? I think it's too much work also to switch between "missing splits" and the "last splits", when it keeps alternating all the time.. :/
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Drazen

Quote from: ignatus on Nov 01, 02:43 PM 2012
OK. This method doesn't work for online casinos (not live) it seems? I think it's too much work also to switch between "missing splits" and the "last splits", when it keeps alternating all the time.. :/

You should change the game my friend. Roulette seems can't suit you.

With no offense please.

You dont have patience, for few pros that posted methods you said seem unintelignet or hard..

What do you expect and want  :question:

Regards

Drazen

VegasArick

So, the reason this wins the money is the fact that after 300 - 350 spins the W's vs. L's are nearly even and the progression puts it in the +  $ ?

If the Wins come clumped together sooner in the session than the losses we can always end sooner while in the + .
We are born "broke"
We will die "broke"
Everything in between is "flucuation" !

F_LAT_INO

How I track                                          lasts                  furthests


6          3                                                   1                      x
17        8                                                   x                      2   
12        6                                                   3                      x   
25       13                                                  x                      4       
16        7                                                   x                      5   
22       10                                                  x                      9       
34       16                                                  7                      x
23       11                                                  8                      x
1          1..got 9 lasts                                9                      x   
                                                                10                     x
                                                                11                     x
                                                                 x                     12                     
                                                                13                     x
                                                                16                     x 
                                                                                        14
                                                                                        15
                                                                                        17
                                                                                        18
                                                               
14 present bet.....6 and 14 just swap places and next bet is furthest 9,and so on only swapping
numbers from 9 vertical lines.                                                               
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: VegasArick on Nov 01, 04:44 PM 2012
So, the reason this wins the money is the fact that after 300 - 350 spins the W's vs. L's are nearly even and the progression puts it in the +  $ ?

If the Wins come clumped together sooner in the session than the losses we can always end sooner while in the + .


EXACTLY AS YOU SAID
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

TwoCatSam

FLATman

Tell me where I'm wrong.

When I bet the nine old splits and one of them hits, it becomes a new split and the oldest new split becomes old.  I then bet my nine old splits and the same number comes.  That same number is now part of a new split, so I lose.

New and old are changing places on every spin except those where the newest nine hit OR the old loses.  Is that not correct?

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

TwoCatSam

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Nov 01, 05:06 PM 2012
How I track                                          lasts                  furthests


6          3                                                   1                      x
17        8                                                   x                      2   
12        6                                                   3                      x   
25       13                                                  x                      4       
16        7                                                   x                      5   
22       10                                                  x                      9       
34       16                                                  7                      x
23       11                                                  8                      x
1          1..got 9 lasts                                9                      x   
                                                                10                     x
                                                                11                     x
                                                                 x                     12                     
                                                                13                     x
                                                                16                     x 
                                                                                        14
                                                                                        15
                                                                                        17
                                                                                        18
                                                               
14 present bet.....6 and 14 just swap places and next bet is furthest 9,and so on only swapping
numbers from 9 vertical lines.                                                               

1.  Should not the red 9 be a 6?
2.  Do you mean you bet on the last 9 and the 14 split (an old one) came, so you swap places with the 16 (not the 6) and 14 and bet the furtherest 9?
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

TwoCatSam

Quote from: hanshuckebein on Aug 08, 02:32 PM 2012
thank you so much, F_LAT_INO. you certainly deserve one of them olympic gold medals.  :thumbsup:

just to make sure that I've fully understood your concept:

1. you wait until 9 different splits have appeared and then you start betting on them.
2. you stay on this selection until it loses.
3. if it loses you cross off the very first split and add the last one. so you always have 9 splits to cover.
4. you stay on this selection until it loses.
5. if it loses you again cross off the very first split and add the last on.
6. etc

did I get it right?

cheers and thanks again

hans

That's all well and good for the last splits, but what about the furtherest.

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

TwoCatSam

Since FLATman cannot post (Steve?)  I sent him this e-mail.  Would anyone care to comment?



FLAT

Here is my way of play.  The 1 split is the first to come and the 18 is the last.  The 1 is the oldest of the last and the 18 is the newest of the furthest.

Let me ask this:

Last Nine             Furthest 9
1                                  10
2                                  11
3                                  12
4                                  13
5                                  14
6                                  15
7                                  16
8                                  17
9                                  18

Ready to play....................................................

Let's assume I bet the last nine and the 15 split hits. I lose. My chart would look like this:

Last Nine             Furthest 9
                                    10
2                                  11
3                                  12
4                                  13
5                                  14
6                                  The 15 is now the newest of the last splits.  It moves to the bottom of the last column
7                                  16
8                                  17
9                                  18
15                                 1  The 1 was the oldest of the last.  It is now the newest of the furthest.

I am now betting for the furthest splits.  My chart would look like this:

Last Nine             Furthest 9
X                                  10
2                                  11
3                                  12
4                                  13
5                                  14
6                                   X
7                                  16
8                                  17
9                                  18
15                                 1 

The 12 split comes and I win.  Now the 12 split can no longer reside amongst the furthest as it has been hit and must join the last column.  My chart looks like this:

Last Nine             Furthest 9
X                                  10
X                                   11
3                                   X
4                                  13
5                                  14
6                                   X
7                                  16
8                                  17
9                                  18
15                                 1 
12 newest of last       2  The 2 split is now the newest of the furthest splits.

Here is where I lose:  I am still betting the furthest and the 12 split hits again.  I now lose, since the 12 split has joined the last column.

Where am I going wrong?

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

adriatic

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Nov 09, 09:50 AM 2012
Since FLATman cannot post (Steve?)  I sent him this e-mail.  Would anyone care to comment?



FLAT

Here is my way of play.  The 1 split is the first to come and the 18 is the last.  The 1 is the oldest of the last and the 18 is the newest of the furthest.--further of the furthest

Let me ask this:

Last Nine             Furthest 9
1                                  10
2                                  11
3                                  12
4                                  13
5                                  14
6                                  15
7                                  16
8                                  17
9                                  18

Ready to play....................................................

Let's assume I bet the last nine and the 15 split hits. I lose. My chart would look like this:

Last Nine             Furthest 9
                                    10
2                                  11
3                                  12
4                                  13
5                                  14
6                                  The 15 is now the newest of the last splits.  It moves to the bottom of the last column
7                                  16
8                                  17
9                                  18
15                                 1  The 1 was the oldest of the last.  It is now the newest of the furthest.

I am now betting for the furthest splits.  My chart would look like this:

Last Nine             Furthest 9
X                                  10
2                                  11
3                                  12
4                                  13
5                                  14
6                                   X
7                                  16
8                                  17
9                                  18
15                                 1 

The 12 split comes and I win.  Now the 12 split can no longer reside amongst the furthest as it has been hit and must join the last column.  My chart looks like this:

Last Nine             Furthest 9
X                                  10
X                                   11
3                                   X
4                                  13
5                                  14
6                                   X
7                                  16
8                                  17
9                                  18
15                                 1 
12 newest of last       2  The 2 split is now the newest of the furthest splits.

Here is where I lose:  I am still betting the furthest and the 12 split hits again.  I now lose, since the 12 split has joined the last column.

Where am I going wrong?---when 12 split re hit you would be next betting last 9----
3,4,5,6,7.8.9.15,12
----Adriatic--ex FLAT_IN_O

Sam

trebor

As I understand the play method you're not going wrong.


It means when the wins come from betting the furthest you'll never win an instant repeat.


Trebor

TwoCatSam

If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

-