Trending Lines with GLAT

[Chris555p]

Hi Proof / Atlantis

I have a question regarding the trending lines with GLAT. After a win is it necessary to wait for a fresh serie 6
new numbers or can we use some of the existing numbers after a win.

For example the last 6 numbers to hit are: 9, 32, 28, 23, 19, 35

translates as lines: 2, 6, 5, 4, 4, 6

This is trigger to bet lines 4 and 6 (19/24 ; 31/36)


Suppose 32  line 6 comes it is a win.

Then no. 13 comes, line2. Then no. 33 comes, line 6; The new last 6 lines is therefore
5,4,4,6,2,6

Can we start betting line 4 and 6….? Or is it necessary to wait for a fresh serie of six numbers after the first initial
win…..?  Thanks



Cheers

Chris

[GLC]

Hi Proof / Atlantis

I have a question regarding the trending lines with GLAT. After a win is it necessary to wait for a fresh serie 6
new numbers or can we use some of the existing numbers after a win.

For example the last 6 numbers to hit are: 9, 32, 28, 23, 19, 35

translates as lines: 2, 6, 5, 4, 4, 6

This is trigger to bet lines 4 and 6 (19/24 ; 31/36)


Suppose 32  line 6 comes it is a win.

Then no. 13 comes, line2. Then no. 33 comes, line 6; The new last 6 lines is therefore
5,4,4,6,2,6

Can we start betting line 4 and 6….? Or is it necessary to wait for a fresh serie of six numbers after the first initial
win…..?  Thanks



Cheers

Chris

I'm not Proof or Atlantis, but I think I can answer your question:

Win or lose, record the winning result and update the LAST SIX results to search for the next trigger to bet (it may indicate the same lines as before or a different combo of 2 lines) If, however, there is no trigger signal then continue to virtually record line results and update the last six decisions until a signal occurs.


As you can see from the above quote from Atlantis' original post, we don't have to wait for 6 more results after a win.  We always check the last 6 results for a trigger.  That means it's possible that we can bet every spin if we continue to get 2 lines hitting 2 times in the last 6 spins.

There's no advantage to waiting for a new 6 spins after a win.  What if you just sat down after the last 6 spins you used in your example?  You wouldn't know that had you been playing prior to these 6 spins, you would have just won.

Go for it.  There will be enough tracking without being able to bet as it is.

GLC

[Chris555p]

Hi George

Thanks for the clarification, I greatly appreciate; It's a gem this system; been playing it live at DB and also in B&M casino;
the hit rate and results are very impressive. Thanks also to Atlantis, proof for sharing.


Cheers

Chris

[atlantis]

Hi Chris555,
Yes GLC is correct with his clarification. I'm glad you're enjoying this topic.

Session played with original 6-rule GLAT:

LLLLLLW   -4         -4   Incr by 0.5u
LW             +2        -2   stay at same level
W               +4        +2   reset to 0.5u
W               +2        +4
Profit = +4
========

Same session played with atlantis rule #7:

LLLLLL     -6          -6   Incr by 0.5 and wait for a virtual 'w'
W             virtual win
LW           +2          -4   Stay at same level
W             +4         +0   reset to 0.5u
W             +2         +2
Profit = +2
========

Same session with GLC mod:

LLL        -3            -3   Incr by 0.5 and wait for a virtual 'w'
LLL
W          virtual win
LW        +2            -1  stay at same level
W          +4            +3  reset to 0.5u
W          +2            +5   
Profit = +5
=========

With this result seems like the "Original" does well - BUT -  the very interesting "GLC mod" fares best here! 

GLC mod
=======

Each line I will call a set of W/L's.

Start @ 1 x 0.5 unit on each line. (1 base unit total)

1.  W   Ends set.  If at a new profit, reset to 1 x 0.5 unit on each line else stay at same bet size and start a new set.
2. LW   Ends Set.  If at a new profit, reset to 1 x 0.5 unit on each line else stay at same bet size and start a new set.
3. LLW   Ends set.  Neutral set.  No bet size change.  Start a new set.
4.  LLL  Ends set at -3.  Increase bet by 0.5 units on each line.  Wait for a virtual Win before starting a new set.

I think/conclude that the way to go is via the original 6-rule or the new GLC way.

A.

[Chris555p]

Hi Atlantis

Yes I agree with yours and Georges' opinions. I also tested the system on auto roulette and it works quite well too.


Cheers

Chris

[biagle]

anyone playing this? dublin:

w         
2+         2+
         
l   w      
1-   2+      3+
         
l   w      
1-   2+      4+
         
l   l   l   
1-   1-   1-   1+
         
w         
4+         5+
         
w         
2+         7+
         
w         
2+         9+
         
l   l   l   
1-   1-   1-   6+
         
w         
4+         10+

[soggett]

quick 180 spins test

llw
lw
w
lllw
w
w
lllllw
llllw
lw
lw
lllllw
llw
lw
w
w
llllllw
llw
lllllw
w
lllllllllw
w
w


ends +24, highest bet 4 units  (flatbetting i get -10 units)
this is the hardest I have found so far
all others i have tested don't go over 2,3 units per spot (maybe just luck so far? )

very nice system with a very very nice progression
perfect for grinders, a few units and you are done, I like it 

great work guys

[Chris555p]

Hi everyone

I play this method regularly, it works quite well, and it has become one of my favourite method. Thanks to Atlantis,
George for sharing..

To push the testing  a bit further I’m wondering if we could test / play  this method against another method which
also gives good results and which also involves playing lines. The method in question was submitted by Ego and
is called   Re: Algorithm win or break even hybrid, even money bets. Thanks to Ego for sharing.

It's just an idea, may be we can also play these two methods concurrently, therefore doubling profits, spending
lesser amount of time at the wheel, reducing risk etc.....Any thoughts……??


Cheers

Chris

[atlantis]

Hi Chris555,

I am still using this and am easily ahead if taking small win targets. It's a nice easy method with no sweat - but patience and determination are required.

For more bet opportunities was thinking that maybe if no bet indicated in last 6 results, and as an optional extension, to then proceed to consider the last SEVEN results to see if there are the necessary dual qualifiers required....? Naturally qualifying lines in the last 6 results will always take priority though... Would be interesting to see how that might affect strikerate!

Another bet you can try with the same recommended GLAT progression is my Line Combo Bet idea which would be faster and will give you plenty more bets to place. Check it out over here:
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=1347.0

Although must confess this just occurred to me and have not actually tried GLAT with that - but could be very promising...  and its another one you could use with separate bank to play in tandem with "Trending Lines".   

Regards,
A.

[biagle]

had a session like this:

lll
lll
w
llw
lll
lll
lll
w


never recovered. dublinbet live.

Any ideas how to avoid such situation?

[soggett]

had a session like this:

lll  - is this LLL....LW? or just 3 L's? if it's just 3L's then no problem
lll
w
llw
lll
lll
lll
w


never recovered. dublinbet live.

Any ideas how to avoid such situation?

[biagle]

big problem:)

3xL
3xL
1xW
even
3xL
3xL
3XL

and so on

[Kattila]

had a session like this:

lll
lll
w
llw
lll
lll
lll
w


never recovered. dublinbet live.

Any ideas how to avoid such situation?

Hi i can help with some LW strategy but of course sometimes no matter what strategys
will use the bad run will catch you anyway, that can be saved with good MM (again just sometimes).
So....try this:
trigger is one virtual W now bet for máximum 3 spins to catch the W , if lose 
L1L2L3  Stop and wait one virtual W then bet again .....
If  after virtual W  you catch one real W bet again for one W
(always bet for 2 Ws  or 3 Ls)  .

Let s take your Lw registry :
LLLLLL(virtuals)W(virt.)L1 L2 W (real) L1 L2 L3 (stop) L L L L L L (virtuals)W virtual.......so on....
Remember , still can hit bad runs :  Wvirt. L1L2WL1L2L3LLWvirt.L1L2L3Wvirt.WL1L2L3LLLLWvirt.L1L2L3........
what to do in this case ? reduce unit size  when lose(to mínimum) , and rize unit size(or stay on same) when win , reset when in plus or  when recovered from
some drawdowns.

.---------------------------------------------------
Now if i use the example from  Sogget :
llw
lw
w
lllw
w
w
lllllw
llllw
lw
lw
lllllw
llw
lw
w
w
llllllw
llw
lllllw
w
lllllllllw
w
w

________________
Lvirtual
Lv
Wvirt.
L1
Wreal
Wreal  stop ( 2 Ws) wait virt. win
Lv
Lv
Lv
Wv
Wreal
Wreal  stop
Lv
Lv
Lv
Lv
Lv
Wv
L1
L2
L3 stop
Lv
Wv
L1
Wreal
L1
Wreal   stop
Lv
Lv
Lv
Lv
Lv
Wv
L1
L2
Wreal
L1
Wreal  stop
Wvirt.
Wreal
L1
L2
L3 stop
.....so on...............

cheers

[soggett]

big problem:)

3xL
3xL
1xW
even
3xL
3xL
3XL

and so on

again I ask
is it
LLL
LLL
W

or is it

LLL....LW
LLL....LW
W?

cause after 3 L's you should wait for a virtual W
that makes it better

+1 on what Kattila said

[atlantis]

Hi,
Remember not to just look for 2 lines to hit twice exactly in the last 6 results - the signal to bet is when you have two lines that have hit AT LEAST twice in the last 6 results... And of course the qualifying lines to bet can change after a spin

So if the line history is

651614   - signal to bet lines 6 and 1

516656   - signal to bet lines 5 and 6

323233   - signal to bet lines 2 and 3

363666   - signal to bet lines 3 and 6

After each spin, update line history and search in the refreshed last 6 results for possible next bet qualifiers.

I'm assuming biagle played according to these rules.

GLC's suggested modification was to wait for a virtual W after a string of 3 L's before re-commencing at +0.5 on each line.

A.