Yankee Doodles

[Priyanka]

Could please expand on what you mean by this Turner ??

Thanking you in advance.

I think he means, he has started betting Ecs, dozens, double streets as opposed to straightups.

[Priyanka]

What a genius? Unbelievable! These were my first impressions when i heard what Sam said about Ralph. There is a lot one can learn from such individuals not only in Roulette, but also in real life. The curiosity, passion and eagerness to learn new skills like programming at this age are qualities that I would pay anything to practice.

I wanted a taste of online roulette before getting into further testing and understanding of the game and I got in those shorter sessions of play that I posted. I also got a free taster of how addictive it can become. So decided to take a short break. Also, was busy with my team doing a fusion dance show over the weekend and thoroughly enjoyed it That really helped in getting over the addiction and taking a break!

Did loads and loads of testing and reading of the forums. Also finished john patrick, brett morton and john solitude as recommended by some fine folks. Great read! I think i need to read them over and over again to digest all that they have written.

I just feel fortunate enough to have had so much advice from all those experience d folks around here and I am really keen to take all that in. Planning to start playing again tomm! Hope it goes as per the plan.

Top 2 learnings since I posted last. No marks for guessing who it came from
"The risk betting .01 and 10.00 is exactly the same"
"That is to say, we should sail with the wind and not against it."

[Turner]

Could please expand on what you mean by this Turner ??

Thanking you in advance.

Ddarko my friend....what priyanka said.
I like bet selection and trigger and still believe you have to play with the current situation....but i find i am fishing with a net more than a single hook and maggot...if you get my metaphore.?
I.e. I earmark line  6 but bet high....or D2 D3

[ddarko]

Ddarko my friend....what priyanka said.
I like bet selection and trigger and still believe you have to play with the current situation....but i find i am fishing with a net more than a single hook and maggot...if you get my metaphore.?
I.e. I earmark line  6 but bet high....or D2 D3

ok, I get that :-) thxs for getting back to me.

[Priyanka]

That break was nice. It helped me doing lots of testing, refresh my mind with ideas and revise my plan for the play a little. After doing multiple tests, decided to change my style of play a little. Following was the plan.

Stick to ECPC, as it was holding up â€" 15u target, 50 stoploss
Decision to replace the regular quad cycle with the speedy Gonzalez version of Quad cycle â€" 10u target, 50 stoploss
Double treble â€" 10u target, 50 stoploss
Author â€" 10 target, 36 stoploss
Replace the flat double dozen selection to LD until double loss and then switch to JD, all flat betting- 10 target, 50 stoploss

Now these five, I decided to play one after the other. I was toying with the idea of the intermingling system to GUT. But decided to switch over to slow turner quad cycle, as I need more practice on GUT. Slow turner quad cycle is essentially playing for sleeper after 3 unique quads appear. So the plan was to play it all through with a stoploss of 50.

This decision was taken based on the advice to stick and practice a handful of systems until you can play it while sleeping and then let the monkey jump in search of other systems. So, no change in 3 systems, 2 changes not in the bet selection, but the way game is played.

Game started in a panic mode, with the ECPC gobbling up to get to a draw down of 22units. Then it started bouncing back and slowly reached the session target of 50u. After taking clues from brett Morton book, I decided to set a slab on reaching win target to 30u. So upon reaching 50u, the plan is to continue playing as long as the session BR doesn’t  go below 30u. This way we could maximize profits when its trending. Then the author system started going horribly wrong. Now I made the quickest decision in my life to stop playing author system and recover it using the best performing system so far, the double treble. All went smooth from there until I reached all mini game targets.

As you can see from the BR trend, it was a very pleasant game. Looking back at what I achieved, it all can be summarized into one sentence “100 down, 19000 to go “

Summary : Session was played in BV. 136 spins. +75 units. 0.5$/unit. Max draw down - 22u.

[Priyanka]

Another day, another session. darn! Need to be more careful on this. Three mistakes today. Played 2 sessions. BR below.

In case someone is interested in how I am playing this. Attached. Please feedback.

link:://:.youtube.com/watch?v=QwmBh-XAqNU

Up by another 105u or 52.5GBP

[Chris555p]

Well done Priyanka, thanks for the video and for sharing; I will have a look at it and provide feedack.

[Priyanka]

Hmm!!  Am I doing something wrong. I am eating, sleeping and drinking roulette these days. My house is full of papers with various calculations. My PC is filling up with excel sheets and short programmes. Its a tough world out there. Either am working or dancing or thinking roulette! As testing is taking most of the time, have hardly had time to play in real play. It is +100$ since I last reported, with +50$ coming in the last two sessions I just finished playing with 0.5$ units. I have played 8 sessions from last post with a mixed bag of results. Pretty much the same formula, a mixture of systems per session on a mixture of betting locations with one system that runs through (either GUT or finale countdown or Brett Morton's against the wheel ECs or 3 in a bed or Quad cycle).

Coming to the unit size, thanks a lot Samster for the advice. I have decided to stick to 0.5$ units until I reach 1000$. Statistics of the last two sessions that I just completed is as below.

[attachimg=1]

Coming to testing, as you all know I have a passion for lines. Got an advice from Proofreaders to go for repeaters! So worked on multiple systems based on repeaters and have boiled down to one now. Chrisbis has kindly agreed to help me in testing. Hopefully, by the next blog it should be in a solid state. The concept behind the system and testing is that spin numbers are unpredictable and hence the focus is on Money management rather than the bet selection.

Forgot to mention, for the first time I had two busts on Easy peasy system. As it was my starting system for any session, I had no option but to terminate those sessions, without playing further. Am glad, this is still holding up.

Had a random thought based on questions from MBB. Still I haven't got an answer. what's the difference between selecting a betting location based on any betselection and randomly selecting the betting location. For eg: if I am playing Easy peasy, why should I use BO/RE etc to arrive at high and line 3 or low and line 4. Why not toss a coin and choose one of them. what's the difference. In my tests so far, there seems to be no difference. I understand having a static bet selection might give sleepers which you will get caught on, but random selection is as dynamic as it could get? Any thoughts?

[TwoCatSam]

Yanks

In your last session, your had a 23% ROI.  That is excellent.  I would consider keeping on with what you are doing.

Sam

[Priyanka]

Thanks Sam for the encouraging words. I am happy to report that I am another 100$ up in the next 6 sessions. First 3 sessions were absolute losses and I had to stop the 3rd session in between to take a break. I thought this is it! Random is now at me!

Then I resumed and recovered the losses in 1 session with the next 2 sessions resulting in profit. The last session was absolute cakewalk. It was the shortest session I every played.

Now I am taking a short break from real play to do more testing. I am also trying to do more trials for the next week to answer one single question that has been burning me for the last 2 weeks. Is random selection any worse than methodical selection? Why is static bet selection not good?

[iggiv]

what do you mean by "static bet selection"? Remember, roulette can give you ANY number. If u give preference to certain numbers in your bet selections, your playing is DOOMED on a long run. Because it is biased. And the wheel is not-- in this certain case.

[ausguy]

Test mode RNG roulette is easier suck in free play (virtually at no cost to the casino). Easier play lets a lot of methods/systems appeear a winner. Program E for EASY.

Real money RNG roulette mode play is set so the casino wins over 50% of the $$$$/money pool & so lots of players lose more often.  Program H for HARD.

Ref : DOCUMENTED PROOF OF CHEATING RNG SOFTWARE.  Find it in search on this forum, VLS & google.

I know it's your money but why DONATE it to casinos ?

[iggiv]

i used to play betvoyager, i felt big difference with playtech RNG. I felt playtech RNG cheating and betvoyager not.
But i quit betvoyager though was winning. Why? RNG is still RNG. And real wheel is a real wheel. If u deal with both for long enough and try to analyze it, you will come to conclusion that real wheel is much more preferable.

Think about it. Many people were banned from live games in online William Hill casinos, but not from RNG. Why? Take a guess.

[Turner]

i used to play betvoyager, i felt big difference with playtech RNG. I felt playtech RNG cheating and betvoyager not.
But i quit betvoyager though was winning. Why? RNG is still RNG. And real wheel is a real wheel. If u deal with both for long enough and try to analyze it, you will come to conclusion that real wheel is much more preferable.

Think about it. Many people were banned from live games in online William Hill casinos, but not from RNG. Why? Take a guess.

I wouldnt ever consider RNG. Ive seen prospects change after a dealer change hundreds of times. it makes a difference after a dealer change.

[Chrisbis]

Great video on July the 12th Yanks................I even go t to like the sound option!! lol

[reveal]I nearly always turn the sound of, and put a soothing CD/Track on instead.[/reveal]

Interesting to watch how the game ebbs and flows up and down the BR fractions!!