lifetime progression

[Le_Chiffre]

yes, le chiffre, around 300k minus. playing the previous color of the spin.
The graphic looked like the fist diagram i had posted in the post with images.
there are TERRIFIC DD, not only with this system. Tried to switch colors after 2 loses (series of 5), then coming back to the initial color.

trust me, you need to be millionaire to play this system )))

that leaves me to the question: WHY DO most of the casinos have table limits? To stop progressions!:)

seriously, its lie dropping your hard earned money on the street for some unintelligent casino managers.

ANd remember this 300k dd on a 3844 spins:)
No limits.
If i put a limit to the progression (ie maximum high reset to 1 after bet= 50 units) the graphs become NEGATIVE. (wow, what a surprise)

Cheers

wow that is severe drawdown. do you have a graph of that session? u sure there's not an error in your code?  btw the different pictures you've posted are they all the same rules with different sessions....or did you change something on each.  What were you doing on picture 8....that looks the best?

thanks

[Le_Chiffre]

i'm going to spend a couple of days manually testing this on roulette extreme as i never know when to trust trackers/bots as sometimes they show amazing results due to error in the code so i guess the same could be said about bad results too.  i will try and do 20k spins manually using the groups of 7 method i mentioned a few posts up.  will post the results when i've done.

[probasah]

wow that is severe drawdown. do you have a graph of that session? u sure there's not an error in your code?  by the way the different pictures you've posted are they all the same rules with different sessions....or did you change something on each.  What were you doing on picture 8....that looks the best?

thanks

Hi le Chiffre,

The diagrams are for Different spins, batches of 3844 spins. Same rules, Different numbers. You can press f9 in the tracker i made and see the same type of diagrams.
They are not for the same numbers.

Cheers,
Alex

[probasah]

i'm going to spend a couple of days manually testing this on roulette extreme as i never know when to trust trackers/bots as sometimes they show amazing results due to error in the code so i guess the same could be said about bad results too.  i will try and do 20k spins manually using the groups of 7 method i mentioned a few posts up.  will post the results when i've done.

Le Chiffre,

I am in the process of making a tracker for bereta 28 method, but i need to see if i got the rules straight. Maybe you can explain with a couple of Numbers to get the idea.

Regards,
Alex

[Le_Chiffre]

Le Chiffre,

I am in the process of making a tracker for bereta 28 method, but i need to see if i got the rules straight. Maybe you can explain with a couple of Numbers to get the idea.

Regards,
Alex

Hi alex, yes sorry, didn't quite understand for a minute there.  ok so I've downloaded the excel sheet and I see what you mean about the drawdown.  I just had one that was 400k.
It is possible to make one of these/edit this for the rules that i mentioned a few posts earlier that i want to play?

many thanks

[probasah]

Hi alex, yes sorry, didn't quite understand for a minute there.  ok so I've downloaded the excel sheet and I see what you mean about the drawdown.  I just had one that was 400k.
It is possible to make one of these/edit this for the rules that i mentioned a few posts earlier that i want to play?

many thanks

Hi le chiffre, sure thing it can be made. Let me have a look at it.

Regards,
Alex

[Le_Chiffre]

Hi le chiffre, sure thing it can be made. Let me have a look at it.

Regards,
Alex

Many thanks

[probasah]

Many thanks

Hey Lechifre,
Sorry for the delay, i have been out. I took a look at your method, and made the tracker for you.
I hope it is what you had in mind, if not, please let me know:

i understood it as follows:
7 spins for an attack, after reset
no bet limit
if during the attack an equal amount to the total bankroll at the beginning, restart the attack
if after 7 spins, negative trend, next attack starts with a bet that gives you a +1 to the overall highest bankroll
Bet selection: EC betting on last spined color

f9 for random numbers or place your spins on the green column.

i got a record DD 37 millions and some pennies:)


Let me know if you need other tweaks,
Regards,
Alex

[Le_Chiffre]

Hey Lechifre,
Sorry for the delay, i have been out. I took a look at your method, and made the tracker for you.
I hope it is what you had in mind, if not, please let me know:

i understood it as follows:
7 spins for an attack, after reset
no bet limit
if during the attack an equal amount to the total bankroll at the beginning, restart the attack
if after 7 spins, negative trend, next attack starts with a bet that gives you a +1 to the overall highest bankroll
Bet selection: EC betting on last spined color

f9 for random numbers or place your spins on the green column.

i got a record DD 37 millions and some pennies:)


Let me know if you need other tweaks,
Regards,
Alex

Wow 37 million DD. I guess you'd definitely have the gambler's butterfly stomach during that session.
I don't mean to doubt you but are you sure you're not doing something wrong with your creation of this spreadsheet. Your understanding of my bet method is correct but the DD is just soooo high and I think it would be impossible to reach that kind of DD even with standard Marty?

[probasah]

Wow 37 million DD. I guess you'd definitely have the gambler's butterfly stomach during that session.
I don't mean to doubt you but are you sure you're not doing something wrong with your creation of this spreadsheet. Your understanding of my bet method is correct but the DD is just soooo high and I think it would be impossible to reach that kind of DD even with standard Marty?

Hi Le Chifre,

I don't think the spreadsheet is wrong(although nothing is impossible), the progression might be what created this once you get into the hole, you cant get out the loss grows exponential.

Cheers,
Alex

[eddy35]

Just play this with a stop loss of 100 units and with a 50 units win target.  For every losing session you have to win 2.
DD can be very deep with this system but not very frequent. If you check the bankrol curves you can see that.

[Le_Chiffre]

Just play this with a stop-loss of 100 units and with a 50 units win target.  For every losing session you have to win 2.
DD can be very deep with this system but not very frequent. If you check the bankrol curves you can see that.

are you actively playing this was eddy?  just seems what if you stop at 100 loss.  then you start again and another 100 loss....and same again etc....

[ati]

Stop losses where the loss is twice as much as the win, will never work in my opinion. After a loss, you have to win two....for breaking even. You win 3 out of 5 sessions, and you're still in the red.
I tested this system a couple times, and it can make a very slow profit, but I reached a point several times, where I had to bet 200+ units.

[probasah]

Hi eddy35,

NOT Working the -100/+50 reset sessions

see attached file

f9 for new spins

Cheers,
Alex

[Big EZ]

In my opinion (which you can take it or leave it) this progression is very good.

If it is not working for you then it is not the progression, it is your bet selection.

Find the variance in your BS and then mold this progression around it and you will get fantastic results