Which online casino is the best + Invincible system to reveal

[atlantis]

The method is simply betting against there being a complete duplicate of the latest six results happening again in the same order over the very next set of six results eg:
1a2a2b1a2a2b (first six results repeated exactly)

I do not know what the odds of this happening are. Quite large, I would imagine. Suppose you had a giant string of thousands of continuous code 4 results. You could make up your own pretend qualifying string and do a search for it eg:
"2b3c2a2b"
Should you ever find such a string existing (where positions 1,2 match positions 7,8) you can just look along and check the next 4 results to see if you would have won; in other words that a string of 6 did not totally repeat itself after the first 2 had matched...
I honestly do not think there could be many 4-step losers.
If you had a database of hundreds of thousands of results you could even do a search to see if ANY six repeat result (a 12 character string such as I have described) ever occurred at all!
Maybe someone could check on that? But remember you must not have spaces, line breaks or return codes in the datafile which may obstruct the search process from doing its job properly.
Possibly it can be created thru an excel program to be checked that way? I dunno.

A.

[RouletteGhost]

May or may not be related

I need to read the thread fully first

But there was a time I'd take the past 3 decisions "dozen column dozen" then bet against it

It did fail a few times

Doz 1
Col C
Doz 2

Now the next 3 bets bet against that

[Steve]

So sad ! I'm coMing back here to deliver everything to you on a silver platter secret included, and stubborn bitter people like you have to disgust me and discourage me everytime

1. Don't take it personally. The forum sees many people make claims such as yours, and none of them so far have delivered.

2. People aren't "bitter". They are rightfully skeptical.

3. If you are attacked personally, you can report such posts. We try to have a balance allowing free speech but without blatant crap.

In all if you have something to share, just share it. There will always be skeptical people. There are also always people willing to listen. But I suggest be direct in your explanations.

[steven1212]

I do not know what the odds of this happening are. Quite large, I would imagine. Suppose you had a giant string of thousands of continuous code 4 results. You could make up your own pretend qualifying string and do a search for it eg:
"2b3c2a2b"
Should you ever find such a string existing (where positions 1,2 match positions 7,8) you can just look along and check the next 4 results to see if you would have won; in other words that a string of 6 did not totally repeat itself after the first 2 had matched...
I honestly do not think there could be many 4-step losers.
If you had a database of hundreds of thousands of results you could even do a search to see if ANY six repeat result (a 12 character string such as I have described) ever occurred at all!
Maybe someone could check on that? But remember you must not have spaces, line breaks or return codes in the datafile which may obstruct the search process from doing its job properly.
Possibly it can be created thru an excel program to be checked that way? I dunno.

A.

Just to remind you, this is how I have always played code invincible. That's how I described in my first post in this thread. I generate 100k number on random.org. I use a 8 or 9 series to select the 4 next number because 12 is too rare and it never happens ! 12 is one chance in almost 2 million !

[Ratwood85]

I will step forward first to reveal and share my idea of improvement...

Track each result to form the usual "Code 4" notation.
(doz-col-doz-col)

For example:

3a2a.......etc.

At the same time also track in reverse "Code 4" notation.

(col-doz-col-doz)

For example:

b1c2.......etc.

Trigger for betting is same as for "Anti-Copycat Dozens" method.

When the last 8 results show that the results in positions 1 and 2 match exactly the results of positions 7 and 8 in the results string then bet AGAINST the results of positions 3, 4, 5 and 6 repeating!

A double doz or double col bet.

Bet against a total repeat of the last six Code 4 results occurring.

HOWEVER - you only start betting AFTER the next two results (seven and eight) are an exact MATCH of results one and two.

The method is simply betting against there being a complete duplicate of the latest six results happening again in the same order over the very next set of six results eg:

1a2a2b1a2a2b (first six results repeated exactly)

But for safety and to gain favourable odds it is necessary to WAIT for TWO repeats to occur FIRST (virtual losers) before starting to bet; up to 4 times; for a non-repeat using a double dozen/column progression.

This means waiting for the right sequence of code 4 results to form.

What you're looking for is a sequence of eight results where results seven and eight MATCH results one and two.

Like this:

1a2a2b1a = cue to start four-step bet against 2-a-2-b also repeating exactly.

Seems quite solid.

1a2a2b1a3  = win +1  STOP and wait for next trigger sequence.

The price to pay is that you have to wait for a bet opportunity - so patience required. Some will not have the patience or may think it does not warrant the waiting.

Use a rolling history of results and always check the last 8 for qualifying patterns (use both types of recording as shown above to get more bets)

It's a simple idea - but strong on hits. That is the reward for the wait.

Even so - I would be very wary of risking a standard 4-step 80 unit progression of 1-3-9-27.

If there is something Steven1212 has up his sleeve that makes C4  as invincible or even more invincible than this then it will be terrific and worth waiting for.



Regards,
A.

been trying your system from last night and turn my BR from 52u to 179u. always hit on 9th or 10th, rare hit on 11th. but need patient waiting for trigger, i'm tracking 2tables so i can turn my BR faster than waiting trigger in 1table only.

Thanks

[vladir]

So, and what is missing then?

[Taotie]

So, and what is missing then?

It's a secret. 

[steven1212]

It's not anymore. I'm about to tell you (unless one more person here decides to call me a liar before I have time to even type it out). Just waiting to buy a keyboard that works. I'm typing on phone now.

Not only that but I will also reveal you the improvements I've made in the past 3 years (bet selection + new progression)

[atlantis]

been trying your system from last night and turn my BR from 52u to 179u. always hit on 9th or 10th, rare hit on 11th. but need patient waiting for trigger, i'm tracking 2tables so i can turn my BR faster than waiting trigger in 1table only.

Thanks ratwood85 for sharing details of your trial games resulting in a total win of +127u.
Sometimes the waits are not too bad. For instance this morning I got 4 triggers (all won) in only 35 spins - and that was just recording one way (I omitted the reverse tracking)
3w on 1st; 1w on 2nd (typical result)
2 tables? - why not? Whatever suits and makes it easier by reducing the time factor.
Can view several tables in some live online dealer roulette lobbies to see if patterns are forming...
A.

[Tekunda]

Maybe I am a bit thick, but I don't get it how to bet against a 4*matrix - col&doz at the same time. Especially progressing, would it reach insanely high units very quickly?
Maybe one of you could be so kind as to give me one or two examples betting this matrix?

[steven1212]

Mate you gotta read the thread and you'll understand. We can't do all the work for you. I can guarantee you this system is as close as you'll ever get to a holy Grail as you'll ever get. It's worth it.

[RouletteGhost]

Thanks ratwood85 for sharing details of your trial games resulting in a total win of +127u.
Sometimes the waits are not too bad. For instance this morning I got 4 triggers (all won) in only 35 spins - and that was just recording one way (I omitted the reverse tracking)
3w on 1st; 1w on 2nd (typical result)
2 tables? - why not? Whatever suits and makes it easier by reducing the time factor.
Can view several tables in some live online dealer roulette lobbies to see if patterns are forming...
A.

[Tekunda]

Mate you gotta read the thread and you'll understand. We can't do all the work for you. I can guarantee you this system is as close as you'll ever get to a holy Grail as you'll ever get. It's worth it.

OK, I understand. Instead of investing your time and effort to give me a short example, you rather use the same amount of effort to give me 'life changing' advice about how not to let "other people work for me" , like in the advice section of a cheap tabloid.

[romano0327]

Guys please let Steven finish,  lets all hear him out before making any jugments.

[kingmaq]

Who talks a lot at the table will leave it hungry. ~ German Proverb

Come to the point What r u waiting