• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

looking for a single dozen/column and a double dozen/column progression

Started by RouletteGhost, Sep 06, 10:42 AM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

Hello. Im sure there are tons of threads on this but maybe some new ideas?

Looking for a safe progression on a single dozen and a safe progression with double dozen.

I saw a double dozen progression of 1 3 9 27 and that is too crazy
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

GLC

Sorry Rich, there are no new ones for either dozens or double dozens.  Maybe a tiny tweak to an existing progression, but nothing new.  They all have losing sequences.  Some increase in bet size faster than others, but in the end if you don't have a stop loss, they'll hit that run of losses that never seems to end.

Sad but true. :'(

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

RouletteGhost

Thanks GLC. There must be a way to bet on double dozens and have a MM scheme thats a winner in a long run. The math is with the bettor since its more than 50 percent of the table

You can even add a zero bet for insurance

Hey glc I saw an old thread you were a part of. The 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 progression on double dozens reseting back to 1 on a high. What do you think
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

ausguy

Rich - It's a tough bet path on the double 2 : 1 bets where you lose twice as much as you win & therefore in basic terms need to win twice as much as you lose just to break even. Zero bets add to the difficulty of profit.

At minimum 1 unit bets (without any zeros) & say you lose 3 in a row you are down 6 units & it then takes 12 winning bet units in total (anway you play it) @ 50% returns to get 6 units back to just break even.

What about the 1 3 9 27 progression (actually x2 of that = 2 6 18 54) with a stop loss on any loss ? I play it sometimes at my local casino on the live dealer Rapid Roulette touch screen section. @ $5 min bet per doz/col & $500 max.,  total bets are then (2 x$5) $10 $30 $90 $270. Min. BR $400.

The triple up 4 level progression isn't too crazy when you leave the casino with a nice profit & a smug smile. I've also played it, to good effect, at a 3 level progression of $10 $30 $90 as hit & run on multiple tables & so only needs a min. BR of $130. The hit & run works on any win at 1 table then move to another table & repeat the process. This used pattern betting (bulk info. on CC here) where the pattern "says to the casino that it can't avoid certain twin 2 : 1 bets over 3 levels ".

RouletteGhost

Thanks

Youd need a win within four spins on a 1 3 9 27 progression

good info on the move table on a win

How about a 1 doz progression?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Proofreaders2000

Quote from: richbailey86 on Sep 06, 10:42 AM 2014
Hello. Im sure there are tons of threads on this but maybe some new ideas?

Looking for a safe progression on a single dozen and a safe progression with double dozen.

I saw a double dozen progression of 1 3 9 27 and that is too crazy

Try a positive progression on the double dozen bets.

1,1,1,1 (four wins in a row, increase both dozens by one unit)

Restart to base bet on a loss.
-----------------------------------------------------------
If a single dozen loses three consecutive times increase bet by one unit.

Less one unit on a win.

RouletteGhost

thanks for replies

how about this?

penthouse prog

progression: 1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,5,5

as you lose step up the ladder, 2 wins in a row reset

on 1 dozen it would be good i think

if you win on the 10th bet at 4 units you have just won 8 units, win a 2nd time in a row thats another 8 units for a total of 16 units

that would cover previous losses and give a loss of 2 units then reset
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

GLC

Rich, Proof’s suggestions are great.  Try them.

I’ve read of another progression for double dozens in which the line is built by increasing the distance between each step in the line by +1 more unit.  So, if you start off with 1-1, that will be the only win level that you earn plus units on.  If you lose 1-1 you increase it by 1-1 = 2-2.  If you lose 2-2 you increase it by 2-2 = 4-4.  If you lose 4-4 you increase it by 3-3 = 7-7.  If you lose 7-7 you increase it by 4-4 = 11-11, etc…  Your line looks like this:
1-1; 2-2; 4-4; 7-7; 11-11; 16-16; 22-22; 29-29; 37-37; 46-46; 56-56; 67-67; 79-79; 92-92 etc…

Move one step to the right on a loss and move 1 step to the left on a win.  When you get back to 1-1, you will still be down a few units if you lose anywhere after 4-4.  This is a relatively safe progression to use.  Only in the worst sequences will you get too deep into the progression.  It will cost you some units to get out of big drawdown but it’s an illusion to think you can continually win small wins without the risk of the big loss.  The above progression gives you a little more hope to elude a major loss.

The true line for double dozens is 1-1; 1-1; 2-2; 2-2; 3-3; 3-3; 4-4; 4-4; 5-5 etc…  Move two steps to the left on a win and 1 step to the right on a loss.  Whenever you get back to the 1st 1-1 you’ll be even for the trot.

Have fun,

GLC

Rich, sorry, I posted mine right as you were posting your last reply.  There's no right answer, just what you like to play.  Test them an see how they work is all you can do.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

ausguy

How about differential book betting (DBB) all 3 dozens & only betting MARTY the differences between the low & the highs for the Dbl Doz/Col ?

Bet 1. Start DBB & Trigger 1  1  1, 30R = -1L -1L +2W  = +/- 0.   Bet 2. DBB calc   2  2  1,  -1 = bet 1  1  0,  24B  = -1L  2W  0L =  -1 +2W = +/- +1.

Bet 3. DBB  2 0 1    bet -2L  0W  -1L, 19R  =  -3L- +1 @bet 2. = +/-  -2.   Bet 4. DBB calc  4 1 2 ,  -1  bet 3L  0L  1W, 36R = -3 + 2  = -1 & -2 = +/-  -3.

Bet 5. DBB 6 1 0  bet 6L  1L  0W, 34R  = - 7 & -3 = +/-  -10.  Bet 6. 12 2 0  bet 12L 2L 0W, 26B =  -14 & -10 = +/-  -24.

Bet 7. 24 4 0  bet 24W 4L 0L, 1R = 48 -4 = +44  &  - -24 (bet 6) = +/- +20. Bet 8. 0 8 1 bet 0L 8W 1L, 13B = 16 -1 = +15 & +20 (bet 7) = +/-   +35.

Bet 9. 1 0 2    bet  1L 0 L 2W, 35B = -1 +4 = +3 & +35 (bet 8 ) = +/-  +38.  End of demo. test.

For single doz/col bets you just bet the single highest amount. If/when 2 bets are the same value just book "V" (virtual) bet until you get a single high amount. eg Bet 2. above is 1 1 0 so a nil money "V" bet. Bet 3. @ 2 0 1 would become a 1 unit bet on the 1st Doz or Col A, as 2 -0 -1 = 1.

Zero insurance bets are an option. The zero outlay can be added to the other bets for a std bet return on any 2 : 1 win. Granted you do lose a bit more on any loss, as always it's risk vs reward.     

nottophammer

Quote from: GLC on Sep 06, 10:53 AM 2014
Sorry Rich, there are no new ones for either dozens or double dozens.  Maybe a tiny tweak to an existing progression, but nothing new.  They all have losing sequences.  Some increase in bet size faster than others, but in the end if you don't have a stop loss, they'll hit that run of losses that never seems to end.

Sad but true. :'(

GLC
Evening George,
You sumed it up nicely,progressions work, but not all the time.
Rich ,just make sure you make enough money before she hits,so that your still in profit after the hit. If you can't make a profit, the answer is give up before the sh-t hits the fan.
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

GLC

Quote from: GLC on Sep 06, 04:28 PM 2014
Rich, Proof’s suggestions are great.  Try them.

I’ve read of another progression for double dozens in which the line is built by increasing the distance between each step in the line by +1 more unit.  So, if you start off with 1-1, that will be the only win level that you earn plus units on.  If you lose 1-1 you increase it by 1-1 = 2-2.  If you lose 2-2 you increase it by 2-2 = 4-4.  If you lose 4-4 you increase it by 3-3 = 7-7.  If you lose 7-7 you increase it by 4-4 = 11-11, etc…  Your line looks like this:
1-1; 2-2; 4-4; 7-7; 11-11; 16-16; 22-22; 29-29; 37-37; 46-46; 56-56; 67-67; 79-79; 92-92 etc…

Move one step to the right on a loss and move 1 step to the left on a win.  When you get back to 1-1, you will still be down a few units if you lose anywhere after 4-4.  This is a relatively safe progression to use.  Only in the worst sequences will you get too deep into the progression.  It will cost you some units to get out of big drawdown but it’s an illusion to think you can continually win small wins without the risk of the big loss.  The above progression gives you a little more hope to elude a major loss.

The true line for double dozens is 1-1; 1-1; 2-2; 2-2; 3-3; 3-3; 4-4; 4-4; 5-5 etc… Move two steps to the left on a win and 1 step to the right on a loss.  Whenever you get back to the 1st 1-1 you’ll be even for the trot.
I just noticed that there is a mistake in this comment.  It should read "Move two steps to the right on a loss and 1 step to the left on a win...  Sorry!"


In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

GLC

Rich, here's an idea for a double dozen bet that's similar to Lanky's 6 point divisor method.

There's a discussion about it here.



link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=3731.msg33882#msg33882
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

GLC

A final reply on this topic.  Final as of now.

This is our progression line:  1-1; 2-2; 3-3; 4-4; 5-5; etc...

Move 2 steps to the right on each loss, move 1 step to the left on each win.  This is very close to the D'Alembert for double dozens.

Here's a short example of how it works:

Bet          W/L          Result
1-1            L              -2
3-3            L              -8
5-5            L              -18
7-7            L              -32
9-9            L              -50
11-11        W             -39
10-10        W             -29
9-9            L              -47
11-11        L              -69
13-13        L              -95
15-15        W             -80
14-14        W             -66
13-13        W            -53
12-12        L             -77
14-14        W            -63
13-13        W            -50
12-12        W            -38
11-11        W            -27
10-10        W            -17
9-9           W            -8
8-8           W             0
Reset to 1-1

I'm not saying this is invincible, but if you have a good bankroll and your wins vs losses returns to the upper 50's% range within your bankroll limits, you'll always reach an even or plus balance.

Remember, with all roulette systems, the longer you play continuously, the greater the chances are that the house will collect their percentage.  Nothing prevents us from sitting down at the beginning of really bad series, but the longer we play at a time, we're sure to hit one eventually.  Shoot for not more than 10% or maybe even 5% for your session buy-in.  I wouldn't buy-in for less than 250 units.

For a simple bet selection method I suggest you bet on the last dozen to hit and the farthest back dozen to hit.  This will catch a dozen that repeats and also a dozen that's due.  A little gambler's fallacy, but what else is there.

As a safety measure, you could wait until you see 2 or 3 virtual losses in a row before beginning to bet for real.  Or you could look for 5 or 6 losses within 7 or 8 spins before jumping in.  More gambler's fallacy so not infallible, but if we're going to use a progression we're fighting the odds at best.  As a matter of fact, we're fighting the odds playing a flat bet as well.  Rats! :'(

Good Luck,

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

ausguy

Rich, GLC - The Guetting progression (GP) seems to work well on the 2 : 59 pm posted results.

The Guetting system (played over 100 years ago by Guetting at Monte Carlo) is a multi stage progression & no doubt I'm not telling you GLC anything new with the GP.

It's designed to quickly reset to the minimum bet to minimise losses. Full info. for GP can be found on Google.

The original progression back when money such as pennies & francs were divided into fractions of those amounts had a 1.5 value at the second level.
So modern values due to inflation need the original values doubled to make sense, as after all you can't normally bet 1 1/2 chips unless it's a very low value game.

The GP progression line is then : stage 1. 2-2, stage 2. 3-3, 4-4, 6-6, stage 3. 8-8, 12-12, 16-16, stage 4. 20-20, 30-30, 40,40.

The basics are, on a win you move up & along the stages like changing gears, as in if you had two in line linked gear boxes. On any loss you drop down to the lowest amount at the next lower stage. In rough terms, it's up 1 step on any win & down 3 steps on any loss. It should be easy to see how losses are minimised.

GLC's examples modded to suit GP.

Bet        W/L      Result
2-2          L           -4
2-2          L           -8
2-2          L          -12
2-2          L          -16
2-2          L          -20
2-2         W          -18
3-3         W          -15
4-4          L          -23
2-2          L          -27
2-2          L          -31
2-2         W          -29
3-3         W          -26
4-4         W          -22
6-6          L          -34
2-2         W          -32
3-3         W          -29
4-4         W          -25
6-6         W          -19
8-8         W          -11
12-12     W           +1
16-16     W          +17   A comparison shows  max -34 down the hole for the GP & ending @ +17 vs max -95 down the hole & ending at +/- 00 for the original.

  The next bet would be 20-20. This GP "gearbox" is player optioned in that further "ratios" can be added to suit any player/table limit.

RouletteGhost

Thanks for all the replies

Guetting progression looks interesting for double dozens. Anyone try this?

Guetting progression can also be switched over to a negative progression? Move up on a loss reset on a win

However, as is it looks promising
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

-