Holy Grail?

[falkor]

These repetitive systems are easy to play, but I never found any that worked. However, this one was showing more profit in flat-betting when I tested it. I didn't know how it would perform using a progression, but thanks to Irish we now know that the 42 progression steps max isn't enough to cover all losing streaks. The warriors system is based on Law of the Third so has more predictability power in certain situations!

[thelaw]

So the guy with 45+ pages of data about his "main" system, can't run numbers on a basic martingale

I posted this yesterday after Iggiv gave Falkor an ultimatum, but before he posted "holy grail" :

"Why should anyone believe Falkor given his behavior through this thread?

How is this behavior not "Trolling"?

If he provided an excellent system on January 1st - why should anyone believe him?

This is a much larger question for the forum as a whole - what behavior warrants a breach of trust?"

How is anyone still falling for this con......................the promise of easy money.............you can't cheat an honest man.

Falkor rides again!!!

[winkel]

The warriors system is based on Law of the Third so has more predictability power in certain situations!

Never ever was any predictable power discoverd by using the Law of the Third.
And there is no certain situation htat gives an advantage.
Certain outcomes may appear and may not. But they will always do so by their statiscal chance.

[RouletteGhost]

He started a thread with an actual strategy. Let it be.

[falkor]

With Warriors, let's say that DS 1 closed on spin # 2-6 and DS 2 closed on spin #17-21 with 1 repeat or less this would predict and guarantee that DS 3 will close within 2 spins - usually the following spin.

[thelaw]

He started a thread with an actual strategy. Let it be.

Should we congratulate him on waking up this morning as well?

When did just "posting an actual strategy" become acceptable?

When did beating roulette turn into a Book Club?

No wonder we don't have a working strategy to beat the game.....

[falkor]

thelaw, Do you think your behaviour could be considered trolling?

How do you think you could improve your behaviour on this forum, or are you above the law?

[winkel]

With Warriors, let's say that DS 1 closed on spin # 2-6 and DS 2 closed on spin #17-21 with 1 repeat or less this would predict and guarantee that DS 3 will close within 2 spins - usually the following spin.

what happened in the spins between #6 and #17? No 4th, 5th, 6th DS appeared and closed? and ds3 sleeping for at least 17 spins has to hit at spin 19? What a holy shrek

[falkor]

I'm only referring to the DSs that are in play as per the rules of warriors, and if there is a long losing streak between DS 1 and 2 closing it means that the action has been happening elsewhere on the carpet: 5-6 DSs are opening up, several repeats are coming in - mostly on the DS that already closed perhaps. It's a bit like GUT: if RN crossings are not happening then perhaps it's the NF crossing that are happening instead.