Life of Brian

[RFMAXX]

Sam. You can Choose one Side randomly.
Or Walt for First Spin and Bet repeater or opposite.
A 2 b 1 or b 2 a 1 is always the Start: 1 Unit on 3 ds

[Chris555p]

Be careful out there with this way of betting, coz when u encounter a long zig zag of about 12 times
135 and 246, we can kiss the br goodbye.......

Extensive testing has demonstrated that there is no edge in playing 135 vs 246.

[TwoCatSam]

Extensive testing has demonstrated that there is no edge in playing 135 vs 246

That is exactly what I found at Riverwind yesterday.

Sam

[RouletteGhost]

As ive said in the past choosing 1 DS from each dozen and playing as an EC just doesnt see the same losing streaks as the other EC. Most ive seen is 12. 15 or more for other EC. If played right can be profitable

[bleep24]

Hi,

Like all roulette outcomes things vary.  I have just tested 1/3/5 - 2/4/6 and ended 22W and 17L.  Longest losing run 3 - once.   I also played another session of 36 spins using a random pre-determined sequence.  It ended at 19W - 17L.    On the way it hit 7 losses in a row but still recovered (eventually)   Before the 7L it was obvious that mainly 4/5/6 D/S`s were hitting and if I had been picking D/S`s as I went I would have picked 4/5/6.  Out of the 7L five were in 4/5/6 so perhaps there is a lesson here as we have all noticed a bias towards a certain side quite frequently.

Hope this helps.

[Chris555p]

I have tested this sort of bet selection extensively and based upon testing results
I'm sorry to say, there is not edge playing this way.  When wins occur it is pure luck
nothing else.........   
With this sort of bet selection, what we win today, we simply loose tomorrow
as simple as that.........

[MrJ]

"what we win today, we simply lose tomorrow" >>> Not laughing but pretty much 99% accurate as hell.

Ken

[bleep24]

Hi, 

I did not use this method to obtain an edge as that is highly unlikely.  Results are just down to luck as you say.   What I was looking for was 50/50 WL and to even them out without any long losing chains.   I am going to experiment a bit with a few MM ideas and see where it goes.  I still think that this can work (is this a triumph of hope over reality!!!)    Watch this space.

Regards,    Bleep24

[Chris555p]

Furthermore, If it was as simple as that to win consistently, everyone will be playing roulette
and we'll all be rich by next tuesday.....

[TwoCatSam]

Gentlemen.....

I only speak for myself:  If you're hoping to make tons of cash--forget it!  If you're playing to have some fun and see how long you can juggle the nerf balls, it can be downright rewarding.  If you're juggling chainsaws--not so much fun.

Sam

[Chris555p]

Totally agree with Sam; Unless u have a br like the queen of England forget it;
Be careful of the falling chainsaw.....

[bleep24]

Hi,

There seems to be quite a bit of negativity on here.  No one said making money at roulette was easy, but then again fire eating is not easy but it does not stop people trying and doing it.    There are ways to make money with roulette but it can take a large bankroll to ride out losses (provided you do not come up against casino limits) so it would be more beneficial to everyone if that creativity was directed in the right direction: ie;   more ideas to test etc.

Cheers.

[bleep24]

Hi all,

Frightened everyone off from the looks of things  HaHa.     I have re-worked the last 2 sessions that I posted earlier using GLC`s Logical Progression and this has worked fine on those examples.    Any comments?

[joiner29]

could you explain progression

[bleep24]

     Hi,

Look in Money Management (this forum)  Logical Progression by GLC.     Basically it is looking at results from previous 6 (what I used) or 10 .  Count how many spins you won and depending on the number, move up, or down or stay where you are.  Read the post for clearer and more full explanation. It makes things safer but winnings will take longer (As is the case with all grind type MM`s)

Cheers