Kimo Li

[Kimo Li]

Don't let these trolls bait you into telling them how you do it. They don't deserve it.

Kimo Li

[thelaw]

Kimo Li has never said that his stuff is gonna work for everyone. He said it works for him and for some people which are getting gut feeling of what he is doing. He even said if i am not wrong that the majority won't probably get good results. So...It is to up to anyone to try his stuff, but there never has been a firm guarantee there. But I know some people wh0 said he did help them win in roulette.

We are not in court here to demand proof and get a firm verdict. Kimo himself has been pretty tired of all this discussion for years i guess. Now with all this stuff coming up over and over again looks like he lost any desire to give some more info many people would like to get. 
What useful all this "court" approach did? Nothing. Just killed all the real roulette discussion with him.

Iggiv,

I'd love to know what we lost when Kimo left after we "killed" the discussion, or perhaps it's the same thing we lost when John Legend left, or how about Falkor?

I'm simply astounded by the fact that a moderator of all people is implying that demanding proof is somehow unreasonable.

It's implications like that that make me question the motives of these boards sometimes. I mean, what do you actually want? Theories? To learn the "art" of roulette?

I, for one, want to learn a system that wins. Not for glory, but money. Nothing more.

Did Kimo bring us any closer to a working system?............Anyone?................(crickets)

As for the "gut feeling" comment, I am at a complete loss for words. What's next, Voodoo?

[thelaw]

Don't let these trolls bait you into telling them how you do it. They don't deserve it.

Kimo Li

Here we go again.........those seeking attention just can't stay away.

[mohitomish]

Marvin, Did you got my message ?

[ddarko]

Don't let these trolls bait you into telling them how you do it. They don't deserve it.

Kimo Li

That's twice you have posted after saying "this is my last post"......

Pls, make your mind up !!!!

& I'm not sure if you meant me, but I promise you, I DON'T live under a bridge 

[Kimo Li]

ddarko,

Let me qualify that statement. This was my last post explaining the strategy.

As far as your comments, you have nothing positive to say about roulette or anything for that matter. Your MO.
How about you contribute your way of winning at roulette and share your winning ways? or any ideas?

I have been challenged in the past. Numbers were given to a group and myself. I then had to predict winning numbers. And so I did. Won every time. It's posted on VLS years ago. It's still there.
In fact, there are several posts where members discuss ideas, doming and sailing, and show profits. Obviously, you have not read them.

Please show me a strategy of yours that wins consistently. We all want to know.

Kimo Li

P.S. Will the bull live?

[thelaw]

ddarko,

Let me qualify that statement. This was my last post explaining the strategy.

As far as your comments, you have nothing positive to say about roulette or anything for that matter. Your MO.
How about you contribute your way of winning at roulette and share your winning ways? or any ideas?

I have been challenged in the past. Numbers were given to a group and myself. I then had to predict winning numbers. And so I did. Won every time. It's posted on VLS years ago. It's still there.
In fact, there are several posts where members discuss ideas, doming and sailing, and show profits. Obviously, you have not read them.

Please show me a strategy of yours that wins consistently. We all want to know.

Kimo Li

P.S. Will the bull live?

Kimo,

Can you post the links to these forum posts to which you are referring where the tests were conducted?

I don't want to reference the wrong ones.

Thank you.

[Kimo Li]

link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=20249.msg148473#msg148473
link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=20064.msg147113#msg147113

[ddarko]

ddarko,

Let me qualify that statement. This was my last post explaining the strategy.

Well, if you had stated that, a simpleton like me would of caught on.....

As far as your comments, you have nothing positive to say about roulette or anything for that matter. Your MO.
How about you contribute your way of winning at roulette and share your winning ways? or any ideas?

Well not all of us have a winning method / way of play do we ? If I DID have a way of winning I'd be playing it, not playing poker like you stated you were..... If I had decided to stop offering consulting players (because it just wasn't worth my time) I'd of done it in a manor that ppl like me wouldn't question. Instead of the hissy fit you posted. Any ideas ? no I will pass thxs, who knows they could be right ?

I have been challenged in the past. Numbers were given to a group and myself. I then had to predict winning numbers. And so I did. Won every time. It's posted on VLS years ago. It's still there.
In fact, there are several posts where members discuss ideas, doming and sailing, and show profits. Obviously, you have not read them.

Nope your dead right, I haven't read them. I read two posts of ppl replying to you.

1. Spike.

Many moons ago he said something along the lines of.....

Kimo Li's books shows you how to track to roulette ball. Neither book showed how to win at roulette.

I thought that summed it up well.

2. 2Cats

He was member of your secret group over at VLS & has stated you produced nothing.

Again, that's good enough for me.

I haven't dissed or bad mouthed you, or your books, or in fact anybody playing a way via you.

Please show me a strategy of yours that wins consistently. We all want to know.

Please see the 1st part of this reply.

Kimo Li

P.S. Will the bull live?

Pls, feel free to educate me & explain what you meant by this sentence, thank you.

[1eleven]

Marvin,
Thank you for the example.  Would you mind sharing the bets that were won and lost?

[Kimo Li]

Well not all of us have a winning method / way of play do we ? If I DID have a way of winning I'd be playing it, not playing poker like you stated you were..... If I had decided to stop offering consulting players (because it just wasn't worth my time) I'd of done it in a manor that ppl like me wouldn't question. Instead of the hissy fit you posted. Any ideas ? no I will pass thxs, who knows they could be right ?

So its not about roulette with you. It's questioning every statement to prove you may be right.

1. Spike.

Many moons ago he said something along the lines of.....

Kimo Li's books shows you how to track to roulette ball. Neither book showed how to win at roulette.

I thought that summed it up well.

Many thought the world was flat at one time. I thought that summed it up well.

2. 2Cats

He was member of your secret group over at VLS & has stated you produced nothing.

I stopped the program. 12 people at the same time, in house fighting, impossible. 2Cat got in because he was a moderator and had access to the group. I could not exclude him from the group, per Victor.  20/20.

I haven't dissed or bad mouth you, or your books, or in fact anybody playing a way via you.

You a good man.

Pls, feel free to educate me & explain what you meant by this sentence, thank you.

If the bull don't sh!t, the bull dies.

Kimo Li

[Tamino]

O yeah. The  internet    the  modern version of the Bora Bora Syndrome ( James Michner ----Return to Paradise )

[thelaw]

link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=20249.msg148473#msg148473
link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=20064.msg147113#msg147113

Thank you Kimo-much appreciated!

Now, the first link is for a few posts where someone gives you 12 numbers and then you provide a number to hit within the next 6 spins. The only issue here is that there is no way to verify these numbers, as opposed to using the Spielbank database where everyone can check it out for themselves after all numbers are revealed. With a simple way to verify the spins, this is no longer suspect.

The second link appears to be for a competition, and I'm still sorting through all of the info (60 pages where they don't determine a winner-not sure what happened here).

If you would be open to it, I could post 10 sets of 12 numbers from different Spielbank days and let you select a number(s) to hit within the next 6 spins. If you are correct, then I could release the dates of the results for full transparency and verification. This is as close to proof as we can get without you explaining the full system.

[Kimo Li]

thelaw,

That's a great idea. Everyone can participate. We will see if anyone from the roulette world can do this.
I will sit back and watch and let players predict. 12 exposed numbers, 6 spin predictions.
Why I won't do it? because I don't want my work to be reversed engineered.

So if you post the numbers, I am sure there are brave souls out there that would give it a shot, even if it is just for fun.

Kimo Li

[thelaw]

thelaw,

That's a great idea. Everyone can participate. We will see if anyone from the roulette world can do this.
I will sit back and watch and let players predict. 12 exposed numbers, 6 spin predictions.
Why I won't do it? because I don't want my work to be reversed engineered.

So if you post the numbers, I am sure there are brave souls out there that would give it a shot, even if it is just for fun.

Kimo Li

Nice deflection Kimo.

So just to be clear- you did it once before, but you will not repeat it for fear that someone may reverse-engineer your method. You didn't seem worried about that before, but now you are?

Well Kimo, I presented you with a fair opportunity to show your proof in a transparent way, and clearly you are not interested in showing that your method does indeed work as you say.

So now we are back to your work as a Con until proven otherwise. I was hoping that you would step up and clear the air with a test, but perhaps I was right all along.

You have truly taken trolling to a new high-art! What a massive waste of everyone's time.