• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

P.A :PREACHING about HG!

Started by P.A, Sep 03, 10:54 PM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Steve

QuoteEven if the systems dont all work those made the forum alive!

Of course not every system will work. The real problem is not much NEW is being done, because people are not understanding what is and isn't possible, and why.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

RouletteGhost

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Steve

He says:

QuoteIt's effectiveness is based on the 111 Law, which says that in 3 rounds of 37 spins all numbers should have appeared similar amount of times.

So like the law of a third. Unfortunately it doesnt tell us WHICH numbers will be repeats or sleepers etc;  not with any increase in accuracy. So it wont work either.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

doola

Quote from: atlantis on Sep 14, 06:08 PM 2015
I believe PA is providing us with a solid SOLUTION - and not a transient and fairweather ILLUSION.

You are not alone.

RouletteGhost

In this thread i like helenas idea

Bet the last dozen to hit once

Wait for a switch of dozen and bet the new dozen once

If you lose wait for a new dozen to show and bet that once

Thats how i think its played anyways

Stable

And how many times can a dozen not repeat at all

I like it because you dont just keep betting for the last dozen to repeat. If u lose and wait for a new dozen to show a few spins can pass
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

P.A


Thanks Mr.Steve,Doola,Denzie, Atlantis, RG, TheLaw, and others for your replies...

This boring preach, is nearing the end.

I see that some newbie interested to learn the gambling,
and they need to learn from the very bottom...

[and I have a suggestion.]

Since TheLaw, Atlantis, Denzie, and others has ARSENAL of mild progressions, maybe their magnanimous heart, could post them here,
only, their mild progressions method...

[The respected GLC, has HUGE arsenal!, but posting here will take much place]

So that the newbies, will spared from Thousand Hours of very tiring hardwork, headache, heartache, frustration, from searching,testing and even trying to understand how the progression...work. hehehe

How we know?
Because, for the last many years, we spent a few hour everyday, thinking about roulette, in bed, in toilet, while driving, even in dream!hahahaaaw

There so many simple progressions,mild progression.
the aggressive one will kill u in no time when variance hit.

this a small contribution, from u,
to help each others...the newbies...
spare them the heartache...

just the mild progression,
but NOT the BETTING SYSTEM&METHOD,
lest...hahahahaaww
that they need to work very hard...
Thanks.

denzie

Quote from: JimmieB on Sep 08, 05:59 PM 2015

And, to now sound controversial, if you don’t like the thread, why bother reading it...guys, there is plenty of stuff on the TV which I don’t like, therefore, I don’t watch it, yeah, it’s on the TV guide when I’m checking to see what’s on, do I select it, of course I don’t, why would I waste my time watching c**p like that, however, what I think is c**p, is another person’s enjoyment/entertainment, and so it should be, they are entitled to indulge themselves in what I think is c**p, and I’m sure they would think some of the stuff I watch is c**p, and so they should.

Jim

:thumbsup:
As spins roll off our predictions get better

Steve

It's not a matter of entertainment. Speaking for myself personally... When I see people being misled, I try to educate them - to help them. Some get it, some dont. I say my bit, then let them find out for themselves.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

denzie

And that's a good thing to do Steve. Much appreciated. But some are really whining. If they don't like then very very very easy ---> DON'T CLICK on the thread. Problem gone. Poooof.

Now as for me and a few others we're doing pretty good with his preaching. The day i bust half of my profit I'll probably say ...damn they was right al along. It was plain luck. But then im still thankful to P.A. cuz he made me look roulette from another angle and im 100% sure i made nice profit doing that.

So finish your preach and this will fade away together with ALL the threads on the forum.

Hallelujah
As spins roll off our predictions get better

Chrisbis

Thank you RG for searching and finding this gem of a system.......

I suggest everyone reads, and digests the 'principle' behind it.

Quote from: RouletteGhost
he came,he saw,he left,11 posts
this guy is winning

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=8713.0

When you have read it.....see if you can find, recognise and discover for yourself
this 'VARIANCE' measurement that has been made.

Quote from: IronSteelNumbers from 1 to 9: a total of 22 times
Numbers from 10 to 18: a total of 15 times
Numbers from 19 to 27: a total of 19 times
Numbers from 28-36: a total of 14 times
0/00: 4 times.

Yes, a measurement of variance.

The author IronSteel, then has the audacity to go and suggest a bet to predict where 'Variance' will strike next!

See it?

Measurement of Variance......not controlling it, or predicting it, but the very knowledge
that it is there, in his game example.....and as thus he can make a BetSelection
to possibly take advantage of it.

I notice with interest too, that its a Streets BetSelection............and 'Line By Line' method analysis too.

I wonder if.............Hmmmm....... interesting on how many different ways we could use this analysis on other similar
BetSelections?  :question:

Happy reading.


P.S.
Measuring Variance, and knowing what its doing right now in your game,
compared to what the expectation via Maths, is not the same as thinking you
can control the output of variance, or predict it.

Though is does make you aware of where you are, in the world order of numbers
and.........crucially......you can try to seek a BetSelection that might just avoid it!  ::)
Roulette..........................
Physical in Nature, Random in Opportunity                                                    The Reveal Originator!

thelaw

Quote from: Chrisbis on Sep 15, 02:46 AM 2015
Thank you RG for searching and finding this gem of a system.......

I suggest everyone reads, and digests the 'principle' behind it.

When you have read it.....see if you can find, recognise and discover for yourself
this 'VARIANCE' measurement that has been made.

Yes, a measurement of variance.

The author IronSteel, then has the audacity to go and suggest a bet to predict where 'Variance' will strike next!

See it?

Measurement of Variance......not controlling it, or predicting it, but the very knowledge
that it is there, in his game example.....and as thus he can make a BetSelection
to possibly take advantage of it.

I notice with interest too, that its a Streets BetSelection............and 'Line By Line' method analysis too.

I wonder if.............Hmmmm....... interesting on how many different ways we could use this analysis on other similar
BetSelections?  :question:

Happy reading.


P.S.
Measuring Variance, and knowing what its doing right now in your game,
compared to what the expectation via Maths, is not the same as thinking you
can control the output of variance, or predict it.

Though is does make you aware of where you are, in the world order of numbers
and.........crucially......you can try to seek a BetSelection that might just avoid it!  ::)

What madness is this!!!

That other thread died because a few guys tested it and it failed, not to mention Bayes and GLC rebutting this guy's philosophy and bet selection.

Here is a quote from that thread:

"Hola Ironsteel

I have 38 sets of live wheel spins from SM - about 7k. I went quickly through few sets and noticed gaps of over 20 between hits in section with with least amount of hits (5 or less). Without any tests  i know from probability charts that 9 numbers can sleep easily over 20 spins. Just do your math. I see dozen sleep over 20 quite often.  I'm not sure here that you can risk your BR waiting for first hit and you need more than one hit usually to be in profit. Only some stop-loss might help. You don't work on large sample of spins to except different results.  From our friend Bayes charts you will see that you will get 25 spins without hit as often as any EC repeat for 10 spins.
Use any probability calculator."

With a minimal amount of effort, the system was debunked.

But there is something much more interesting in the last post from Ironsteel (author) :

"This system has brought me optimal results"

That's right, not winning results, but optimal results......................that's a huge difference.

But let's keep using BELIEF in place of FACTS....................look at what we've achieved..............oh...wait.........we still have no system :sad2:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

Turner

Law...it looks like no one is listening to you. I didnt read your quote cos I read the post. Others have read all this and can make their own minds up.
They dont need your guidence. You arnt opening anyones eyes.
You arnt the little boy in The Kings New Clothes.
Give it a rest.

thelaw

Quote from: Turner on Sep 15, 09:45 AM 2015
Law...it looks like no one is listening to you. I didnt read your quote cos I read the post. Others have read all this and can make their own minds up.
They dont need your guidence. You arnt opening anyones eyes.
You arnt the little boy in The Kings New Clothes.
Give it a rest.

Glad to see that you are taking time to comment on posts without reading them...........this is much more efficient.

Keep up the good work! :thumbsup:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

thelaw

Quote from: Turner on Sep 15, 10:07 AM 2015
Law...
Sarcasm and negativity all the time
I am asking you to give it a rest.
Understand?

"Law...it looks like no one is listening to you. I didnt read your quote cos I read the post. Others have read all this and can make their own minds up.
They dont need your guidence. You arnt opening anyones eyes.
You arnt the little boy in The Kings New Clothes."

That is negativity.

I know that you have issues with me Turner, but please use pm in the future so that we don't waste everyone's time. Thank you.
You sir.......are a monster!!!

Turner

Law...
Lets clarify what I am asking you to do
You are constanly trying to run the forum on your terms.
Rallying people to take your view. Trying to close posts you dont like. Trying to get people like PA banned
I dont like it and I am asking you to stop
Please !

-