• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Few questions about roulette

Started by goldrosen, Mar 22, 05:31 AM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

goldrosen

Hi everyone,

I have few questions here n hoping someone can answer them.

First, is it true that single color will appear double than two consecutive color n two consecutive color is double than three consecutive color in the long run n so on? Like brbrbr is double than bbrrbb in the long run.

Second, if roulette do not have memory of the last spin then how can the result let say 1k spins balance out? For example 525 red n 475 black? Why cant it be 750 red n 250 black since its random n do not have memory.

Last, may i know what is ur favor system, money mangement n bet selection that u r using now? Thanks.

Sorry for my bad english, looking forward to ur answers, TQVM.

MumboJumbo

If you have 750 reds and 250 blacks then wheel have bias, so the casino will change with new one, they are not fools.

Turner

Well its just distribution which is maths....but according to experts here...roulette has nothing to do with maths so it may be Faries who magic them level with their tiny little magic wand

Foolwise

Quote from: Turner on Mar 22, 06:47 AM 2016
roulette has nothing to do with maths
:lol:

Math has something to do with roulette, but nothing it has to offer which will make one beat the roulette. Not to play with words, but that is the truth. Truth is only true to the extend that I have knowledge about. Until the point someone comes forward with a way to beat roulette with math, math is not useful for roulette.

I see that no one has answered Goldrosen's questions though.

>>>>First, is it true that single color will appear double than two consecutive color n two consecutive color is double than three consecutive color in the long run n so on? Like brbrbr is double than bbrrbb in the long run.

It is not that single color will appear double than two consecutive color. Chances are that single color will appear double than two consecutive color.

>>>>Second, if roulette do not have memory of the last spin then how can the result let say 1k spins balance out? For example 525 red n 475 black? Why cant it be 750 red n 250 black since its random n do not have memory.

It can be 750 red and 250 black. Quite possible. However the chances of seeing them are rarer than 525 red and 475 black. Taking larger numbers will make it difficult to understand.

Take smaller numbers. 4 spins. 3 reds and 1 black vs 2 reds and 2 blacks. 4 times vs 6 times. Chances of seeing 3 reds and 1 black is rarer than 2 reds and 2 blacks.

Expand this to 10 spins. Chances of 10 reds in a row is closer to 1 in 1000 trials and is rarer than chances of 5 reds and 5 blacks. That is because the combination of 5 reds and 5 blacks can come in a number of ways where as there is only one possible combination of 10 reds.

So the closer you get to the middle there are more combinations possible like 5 out of 10 spins 10 out of 20 and the further you get away from the middle lesser number of combinations possible and so it becomes rarer. Math guys will say that is distribution.

Expand this now to 1000 spins. The number of combinations multiplies to billions and billions, you would not want to know. When combinations are really huge, the rareness of 750 red and 250 black appearing is multiplied multiple folds when compared to 525 red and 475 blacks. So you dont see that combination because it is so so rare for it occur.

Next time when someone says after 10 reds bet black, do not dismiss it as a gambler's fallacy. As per math, we have seen a rarer situation than 9 reds and 1 black or 8 reds and 2 blacks and if it is a 1/1000th probability, you will not see ideally for the next 1000 trials. But if you did see that, just listen to the math guy who say that it was a 1 in 1 millionth probability.

Go to a table that offers you 0.1 bets in any of the online casinos. Play until you find 20 reds in a row or 20 blacks in a row. You have just witnessed a rare event. As soon as you have played through this rare event by placing 0.1 bets or for that matter even 1 unit bets, shift to a standard limit table and place 50$ on the outside bets and play for the opposite color after 10 spins of same color using a martingale progression for 300 trials. I bet you will earn really nice.

The fact and truth remains the same, whether one likes it or not, it is fun to know maths, but it does not help one in beating roulette, like the way we want it to be.
The fool doth think he is wise; but the wise man knows himself to be a fool

Turner

Quote from: Foolwise on Mar 22, 05:54 PM 2016
The fact and truth remains the same, whether one likes it or not, it is fun to know maths, but it does not help one in beating roulette, like the way we want it to be.

So why do you like repeaters?

Then in the remaining 20 spins we should expect 5 non-hits and 15 repeaters. Why are we playing KTF on non-hits and not repeaters. Common sense says play for repeaters as we can expect repeaters 15 times and non-hits only 5 times.

They repeat because of normal distribution....which I think is Maths lol

Foolwise

The average of non-hits in 30 spins is 15. We are starting to play after 10 spins of no repeats. Then in the remaining 20 spins we should expect 5 non-hits and 15 repeaters. Why are we playing KTF on non-hits and not repeaters. Common sense says play for repeaters as we can expect repeaters 15 times and non-hits only 5 times.

This was the complete sentence. Quoting it partially does not help. Notto's claim was 15 non-hits and 15 hits in 30 spins. My question was if he starts playing after 10 nonhits in 10 spins, then in the remaining 20 spins, we have got 5 nonhits and 15 repeaters. So why not play repeaters and not nonhits. It is not that i like repeaters here, it is just a clarification and he clarified that it is not next 20 spins, it is next 30 spins.

Secondly, I do not think it is normal distribution. There is a huge difference between average and normal distribution. Average definitely takes out extreme outliers where as normal distribution doesnt. "Normal" and "average" are often confused. What notto is taking here is an average and normal. Normal is always a range.

If you have been talking about repeaters in general, then again they are not normal distribution. They are more a practical example of a ladenprincipe. Martingale is a great form of roulette getting beaten with math. But is there any other principle based on math that defeats roulette? KTF is winning, which is a fact, if one believes in the testing that it is undergoing. But if you use plain math, it is easier to prove that KTF will fail. So does math help?
The fool doth think he is wise; but the wise man knows himself to be a fool

Turner

Ok...I am being a little faceious.
You have an observation...hence a theory...and you prove or disprove using maths.
1. I noticed 13 follows 31 more than normal. Maths proves it doesnt
2. Numbers repeat in a 37 cycle. Maths proves it does.
You can use maths to help you win at roulette.
I think goldrosen (remember him? Lol) will not object to this healthy discussion.

nottophammer

I ran about 500 000 cycles of 37 spins and came up with the following:

(Number on left is number of unique numbers and next number is how many times a spin cycle had exactly that many unique numbers in the test)

37 spin cycle:

15   1
16   12
17   202
18   1417
19   6020
20   18309
21   41304
22   73951
23   98780
24   102814
25   80164
26   47276
27   20934
28   6706
29   1685
30   349
31   35
32   5

This is the best piece of info for playing roulette.
Turner are you a politician putting a spin on KTF. KTF uses the 30 spins after the 1st 10 spins, its over 40 spins not 30 spins
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

Turner

Notto.....your observation is backed up by maths. Your numbers show a belle curve. So you know its a truth not an unproven observation. Thats my point.
Like I said....I was being facetious quoting foolwise but it still stands. An observation doesnt become theory until proven
Too many here think "its winning so it must be true*

Turner

Really sorry...locked the topic by mistake. Fat fingers on mobile phone

Foolwise

Really fat fingers. I see Denzie also now changed to notto  ^-^

I really really hope that goldrosen do not mind a healthy conversation.  :xd:

We both seem to agree on the fact that there are certain things that is a fact. At least I think, I am agreeing with you that this is a distribution. It is a pregnant lady standing up there with a bulge and when she lies down it shows a proper normal distribution with a mean that is slightly biased towards the lower side on the number of unique numbers.

What we dont seem to agree on is how does this help beat roulette. Show me a single instance where this kind of mathematical information has helped win in roulette.
The fool doth think he is wise; but the wise man knows himself to be a fool

nottophammer

Turner i agree to maths saying you wont win,but, there is a but. I play on the way home so theres a 24hour gap before i'm back at the FOBT, the mickey mouse roulette. Yes during the 24hrs maths is getting it right, but i'm not there.
Now when i turn up theres 37 #'s, now the 37 cycle comes into play, When do 1x's start to effect KTF, on a live wheel not often, mickey mouse roulette is a different ball game, i'm using a human beings take on a roulette wheel.

Its taken many years recording the FOBT and it gives on avg 15 point something non-hit in 30 spins not 20 spins.

Last night Dave comes in, real smart dressed bloke, sharp suit you know the type, but hes put £300 thru in minutes, like the daily mail keep on saying.

So Turner, 10 spins say no repeat, leaves 27 non-hit, now over time i've got to find the next 30 spins gives on average the 15 point something non-hit,okay. Now during those 30 spins Dave is playing his usual #'s plus say a few more for luck, so if Mickey FOBT gives 15 non-hit during the 30 spins it means 12 of the 27non-hit where never coming,whats to say Daves random numbers include those 12 that are not coming, £300 had gone thru and yes telling greg whos just came in yes i've won a bit i've got my £300 back.
I had 2 games 1 in ladbrokes and the other in corals, under an hour +£22 and some coin all successfull because of knowledge on how Mickey FOBT plays, but he don't always play the way maths says
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

NextYear

Notto, have Greg brought his £300 with him?
And has Dave used foul language while playing?

Turner

Denzie to notto was a fat head not fatfingers :wink:

Hmmm....perhaps i mean this

I see 14 has hit twice so I think....it wont hit again soon....its more likely to be one that hasnt hit yet.

But if I look at the maths...say normal distribution and variance i can see repeats hit 3 and cold numbers can sleep for 800 spins.
The maths proves this.
Surely its better to have maths backup for your decisiions than saying I think this and I think that. Like 13 follows 31

nottophammer

How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

-