1 Million to 1 system!!

[Gzgzbee]

Evening All,

The odds of 8 numbers not showing for 58 spins is 1,350,00 to 1!

I ran some RNG tests years ago with 1 millions spins, maybe 30 odds time! Soo 30 millions spins and only once or twice it ever pasted 58 spins. Don't think I have saw it last 60!

If we wait 25 spins to get our 8 unhit numbers then bet them 8 numbers for 33 spins one should hit.

Can anyone run a RNG simulation with any 8 numbers and see how far it goes without any of the 8 numbers hitting!?

Thanks 

[Bettingking]

Great idea but the progression would be a problem being able to handle 33 spins and not go into 100 of units drawdown....worth a think about this one though...

A shame we arnt all millionaires without any table limits then i think the casinos would have a problem   

[Gzgzbee]

Well that's the thing...the high progression and table limits BUT...

I only need £200 bankroll.

And only looking to profit from 9p to £1 per win!

For a human with would become very boring everyday for 12 hours.

But how about a BOT!?

Small profit over 24 hours!

[Gzgzbee]

My main aim is to confirm what my testing years ago showed, no set of any 8 numbers go beyond 60 spins without of them showing.

I actually tested it on 2 x Corner bets over 60 spins but I guess it will show the same result.

Can anyone run the simulation for me!?

Thanks

[BellagioOwner]

Statistically interesting approach but won't work in long run with bot as you intend. I can mention 2 things

1) You are not playing against 8 numbers not to show for 60 spins. You are playing against a statistical probability of an event to happen. So if you stick to the same numbers or if you change any number per spin, you would have the same chance of winning or losing. Even if you waited for 25 spins as trigger as you specify there would be still a bet against statistics to happen and not against these specific 8 numbers not to show.

TL/DR feel free to bet on any 8 numbers per spin and no need to wait for trigger. Just start at once.

2) The progression you want to be made to bet 8 numbers for 60 spins is HUGE. 60-spins negative progression is dangerous.  Not to mention that not ANY casino would let you use so long progression on their table limits. Not even starting at bet voyager 0.01 as base unit will be enough.
Bet Voyager is bot friendly as far as I know but even there MIN = 0.01 and MAX for quad bet (Supposing you play 2 Quads to cover your 8 numbers) is 400 (or 40.000 units depth) This is not enough.  This covers you up to 45 step progression.

On the excel you can see the units needed to bet per Quad in 2 quads per spin for your progression. It starts smoothly as all progressions and in step 45 you have to bet 31.737 units per quad (63474 units in total) to get back 1 unit. You bet 634 euros to get 0.01 cent back. It's plain dangerous.

Feel free to use the excel for any testings of yours. It covers up to step 45 of your needed progression. You won't be able to play it else where beside BetVoyager or some other EVEN smaller micro casinos that I have mentioned in older posts of mine.

PS: Welcome to the forum

[BellagioOwner]

Excel 2.0

I added also the progression for straight up as you wanted instead of quads. It's better to use quads though in my opinion. They turn to be much cheaper and reach a bit deeper in the progression within the table limits. The first set of numbers is the progression for quads and the second set of numbers is the progression for straight ups. Cheers! 

[iggiv]

you guys are wasting your time. Sorry to crash your party. It's not gonna work.

[BellagioOwner]

you guys are wasting your time. Sorry to crash your party. It's not gonna work.

Agree. It's the first thing I mentioned but I thought I could give the bets on the progression asked 

[RouletteGhost]

you guys are wasting your time. Sorry to crash your party. It's not gonna work.

I do agree time is being wasted here

Iggiv why don't you share how you play

[iggiv]

I did. I said try this you did not even pay attention. But i am not gonna spend all my life here with all the details sorry. I have lack of sleep even without it

[Gzgzbee]

Thanks for the comments guys!

Still interested in too see if 8 numbers can go passed 60 spins without showing.

Can anyone run that simulation!?

Thanks

[iggiv]

almost anything is possible. the question is "how often". Some things you won't see in your lifetime. Some things you won't see unless you play every day. It can be very individual. One can be 'lucky' to catch this a few times, another one can't.

[BellagioOwner]

Not sure about this exact approach but as of mathematical/statistical perspective this is interesting.

The odds of 8 numbers not showing for 58 spins is 1,350,00 to 1!

How you reached at this result?

What I can think of is:

Odds of 8 numbers not showing for 58 spins(european): 29^58/37^58 =7.301E-07 (or else 0.0000007301 or else )

So every 1 spin this will happen 0.0000007301 times. In other words. It will happen statistically 1 time every 1,369,671 spins. Is this what you also reached? You just rounded it to 1,350,000 to 1?

Can someone with knowledge on maths verify my calculations or point me out any mistake?

PS: I suppose this chance is the same whether we stick to the same 8 numbers per spin or we randomly pick any 8 per spin, right?

[Gzgzbee]

BellagioOwner - your maths is correct!! and yes i did round down for ease!

Like i said I tested that over many 1 million RNG spins and not once did it pass 60 spins!

Can any one run this to see if they get the same results!??

[BellagioOwner]

I am running it on a site. Not sure of its integrity to be honest but so far it is at 2.6 M and the longest recorded is 60. Once. Eventhough I have reached 65 on PaddyPower on just 3rd trial.  Sometime the inevitable will probably happen. All we don't know in systems is when and how rare