Colour Matrix

[Steve]

Well, I made the 500

It looks like the topical chart from progression betting.

If your system was the same as random bets, and typical progression, wouldn't you want to know, so you can try something different?

Or would you rather fool yourself?

[nottophammer]

Typical chart
1st 100 spins R,B Next 100 spins E,O

Try something different, what like a cheating device losers use

[nottophammer]

Yes Saint took a week to curve fit

[nottophammer]

#18 spin 201
I use Even and then follow the order; great set of spins

[pepper]

Try something different, what like a cheating device losers use

It's not cheating; I would use one if they really worked.

Casinos consider any known method of AP as cheating. The law rules that you can predict spins using a computer, because you aren't affecting the result. I just don't think Steve's computers are legit.

[winkel]

#18 spin 201
I use Even and then follow the order; great set of spins

I bet you have forgotten to subtract the betsize

[nottophammer]

Jono; or resident experts.

Do we see a certain sequence more often than others. You experts what sequence kills you?
Could it be the one most quoted; r,b,b,r,b,b,r,0,b
Or, r,r,r,b,b,b,r,r,r

I'd take r,b,r,b,r,b,b all day long even reverse it. Or; b,b,b,b,r,r,b,

[nottophammer]

slalom; Jono ??

[nottophammer]

Len; slalom?

[gizmotron2]

Jono; or resident experts.

Do we see a certain sequence more often than others. You experts what sequence kills you?
Could it be the one most quoted; r,b,b,r,b,b,r,0,b
Or, r,r,r,b,b,b,r,r,r

I'd take r,b,r,b,r,b,b all day long even reverse it. Or; b,b,b,b,r,r,b,

I see singles on the weak side the most. I see absence of singles. I see doubles on the weak side with absence of singles, and absence of triples.  This is a weak version of singles on the weak side, your own example: " r,b,b,r,b,b,r,0,b."

You should know that there is no sequence that is dominant. You should get use to the idea that what you get is what you get. Just play what you are getting.  This might be frustrating but the absence of any recognizable pattern is also information. All you need from these stretches is to recognize what they are and to speculate, once in my opinion, on them continuing. If you can pull out one net win from any sequence then you are doing well. Going for the long shot runs works only some of the time.

I take the casino's money and break it up into parts where half is used to get the first win off of the first try. Everything after that is free of charge. So let a little run short, a little run a few spins longer, and let the the last bit run for a longer while. All these after bets are doubling down and are eventually being taken off after there pre-selected intervals.  But that is just the way that I like to speculate on trends. 15 reds in a row is a good example for this type of Aspeculation.

[nottophammer]

Slalom the 2

[nottophammer]

Giz
15 reds in a row. Take that all day long, as selection is defined by the mat; like foxy said takes the pressure off.
It's like r,b,r,b continuing, take it all day long.

It's tripples or quads that are awkward

[gizmotron2]

It's tripples or quads that are awkward

I watch for anything that sticks out. A swarm of triples is fine with me. Anther way that is more common would be an absence of singles or doubles but with a bunch of 3's, 4's, or 5's and greater. It happens. Just go with it.

[nottophammer]

Giz
You see #2 last spin.
Now if you knew how to slalom on the mat; #36 starts a run of 3 reds. This would be great if you use option 1 or 3; but option 2 would have you sweating a bit, but the black is win, so, R_R_R_B
you can see it appears again, but black gets the win.

This set of spins didn't see the r,b,r,b to much, that the slalom can handle

There's more, but Saint will only say do I want to learn, "cough"

[gizmotron2]

So I took your list of spins and entered them into my playing software and got this:

Code Select Expand


| B  R | O  E | L  H | 0  6 | P | S |
|    X |    X |    X | X    | X | X |
| X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |
|    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |
|    X |    X |    X | X    | X | X |
| X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |
|    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |
| X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |
| X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |
|    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |
|    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |
|    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |
| X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |
|--------------------| X    | X | X |
| X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |
|    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |
|    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |
|    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |
| X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |
| X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |
| X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |
|    X |    X |    X | X    | X | X |
|    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |
| X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |


There's a huge domination in the Primes ( P )