Patient dozens

[Drazen]

Ok guys,  i posted this also on old VLS. Let me give you this idea.  Nothing special, maybe even seen before, but anyway you can comment.  It is all about simplicity and PATIENCE.  I personaly havent seen this before, although some similar systems yes. .
It is good thing to play when you spot situation like that, while you are maybe playing some other system.

Idea is to wait one dozen to hit 3 times in a row and the we play other 2 with progression +2 on a loss -1 on a win unitl we are not +1 in a new high.  Then reset and wait another situation like that.  You wont have many of them, but I did some tests and works realy realy good.  DD are not big at all So I am using at least 10 units base bet.

Regards
                   Drazen

[Drazen]

 I just finished testing in RX 1500 spins. . .  I cant belive what I see. . .  What a beauty. .  It deserves at least some of tests of people here.  I have done my testing, now it is your turn

Regards
                 Drazen

[atlantis]

Hi drazen_cro,
Sekuritati posted something similar a while back in this thread:
link:://rouletteforum.cc/the-notepad/wait-for-three-consecutive-spins-of-the-same-dosencolumn-system/msg8029/#msg8029
You're suggesting +2 on a loss and -1 on a win until level or ahead?
What was highest progression units you had to play in those 1500 spins?
A.

[Drazen]

Hi drazen_cro,
Sekuritati posted something similar a while back in this thread:
link:://rouletteforum.cc/the-notepad/wait-for-three-consecutive-spins-of-the-same-dosencolumn-system/msg8029/#msg8029
You're suggesting +2 on a loss and -1 on a win until level or ahead?
What was highest progression units you had to play in those 1500 spins?
A.

Thank you for this, i didn't see this before. Also very interesting.  Yes trigger is same, but progression little diferent. +2 on a lose   -1 on a win until we are min 1 unit in new profit. In these 1500 spins i had highest progression 9 units. But still this requires more testing.

Regards
                  Drazen

[atlantis]

Hi drazen_cro,
Thanks for clarification. I think it a good system. If I remember rightly I tested it just flatbetting until won +3 or lost -10 units over 20 sessions - and I think only 2 out of the 20 sessions lost...
Anyhow, maybe can be applied to the columns also (with separate bank) for more bets.
Cheers,
A.

[Drazen]

Hi drazen_cro,
Thanks for clarification. I think it a good system. If I remember rightly I tested it just flatbetting until won +3 or lost -10 units over 20 sessions - and I think only 2 out of the 20 sessions lost...
Anyhow, maybe can be applied to the columns also (with separate bank) for more bets.
Cheers,
A.

Thanks, yes this i think that could be applied to columns too. You would have more bets at that way, but if your bet is on columns and dozens at the same time you need bigger bankrool.

Regards
                   Drazen

[IIIRAZORIII]

if you miss, do you increase and rebet or wait new qualifier

[Drazen]

if you miss, do you increase and rebet or wait new qualifier

Yes increase and rebet, because i always get in plus through next few spins. You can also play to aim only on 1st or 2nd hit, something like sekuritati is playing, if no hit, stop and continue with that amount of units on next qualifier.

Regards
                 Drazen

[marivo]

Yes increase and rebet

Rebet means to wait another 3 spins with same doz in raw, right?


Thanks.

[Drazen]

Rebet means to wait another 3 spins with same doz in raw, right?


Thanks.

Well after you lose on 1st hit after trigger, you can wait another 3 hits in row (like sekuritati suggested) and bet with +2 from last bet or you can continue at that way next few spins because from my test i concluded you will be in plus quickly very often, then stop and wait new trigger. I hope you understand these ideas. In other words much more time you won't have 6 hits in a row on same dozen.  Of course that can happen, but so you stop after 2nd lose, wait to hit sleepeing dozen, then waiting new trigger. I did quite some testing and this has some merit.

Regards
                Drazen

[marivo]

Ok. Thanks.

[Proofreaders2000]

I tried it Drazen_cro and it is better as a "hit and run" system.  One win, leave.

[Drazen]

I tried it Drazen_cro and it is better as a "hit and run" system.  One win, leave.

Thanks for testing, but when you are reseting after every new high on 1 unit, isnt that same thing as always starting new session until 1 hit?

Regards
                    Drazen

[Proofreaders2000]

In theory, yes, but when I tested the system it would win the first attempt then lose two or three times before the next win.

[ZeroBlue]

so what about playing after in the total games you are losing by 5?
maybe it would turn it very holy schmolly as Hermes says.. 
example:
11 games result: 3 wins 8 losses
then start betting

also i would only play it for dozen 1 & 3 in a La partage rule table with 3 chips on High or Low and 1 chip on line 3 or 4.

ALSO WE COULD TRY...
===============================================================
*there are 27 formations for groups of 3 consecutive dozens/columns
so there are 9 groups "matrix style" starting with each one


example dozzen 3


311
312
313
321
322
323
331
332
333


so we can try instead of hitting the sleeper, bet that it will sleep one more time.



Zer0Blue