• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

William Hill assholes

Started by niksa, Feb 11, 07:59 PM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

niksa

Quote from: vile on Feb 13, 06:55 AM 2012
--5000 units bank should be substantial for any law of the third method whith possibility
of higher limits-say 1000/1....and low chip 00,1...which some casinos offer.....but the problem
is that most people.have no patience of this kind of betting.....congratulation Niksa.

Yes for sure,I spent and lost too mutch money on the various systems and experiments,to me such a patient and a safer game now comes as a kind of rehabilitation.  :twisted:

Thanks btw!!  :thumbsup:

biagle

hello

niksa, you play with 0.1 units? on will hill live delear minimum is 1 unit (1 euro). Or you play on rng? How much minimum bankroll you recommend for what method if you play with 0.1?

thank you,
biagle

niksa

Quote from: biagle on Feb 16, 12:11 PM 2012
hello

niksa, you play with 0.1 units? on will hill live delear minimum is 1 unit (1 euro). Or you play on rng? How much minimum bankroll you recommend for what method if you play with 0.1?

thank you,
biagle

Hi!!
Yes I play with 0.1â,¬ by unit,as I know on Will Hill live dealer is 0.1â,¬ min per number,I do not know more than when I'm banned  :D. I reccomend you The higher the bank but a minimum for me is 300 â,¬.

Have a nice day,

Niksa

downthehatch

Quote from: superman on Feb 14, 03:22 AM 2012
LoL his book is out of stock!

link:://:.amazon.co.uk/Sequential-Roulette-Balvinder-Sambhi/dp/0955965101

Don't forget to read the reviews, looks like a waiting game and good old marty, maybe the press coverage was to get noticed and then make book sales, maybe he worked for the casino too!!

i bought the system on ebay,  play 2x groups of 4   8 9 11 12    26 27 29 30

play either 10p   28 step progression  or £1   20 step progression  both needed £2500 bank
those days i was still playing Rng and did not realize they were rigged, i actually won £400 but then lost the lot when the two groups did NOT appear for 43 spins on the trot !!!!

Still on sale from several vendors on ebay!!

Cheers dth

iggiv

progressions like this don't work. period

Bayes

Quote from: downthehatch on Mar 05, 09:36 AM 2012
i bought the system on ebay,  play 2x groups of 4   8 9 11 12    26 27 29 30

play either 10p   28 step progression  or £1   20 step progression  both needed £2500 bank
those days i was still playing Rng and did not realize they were rigged, i actually won £400 but then lost the lot when the two groups did NOT appear for 43 spins on the trot !!!!

Still on sale from several vendors on ebay!!

Cheers dth

So let me get this straight; the progression busts and you come to the conclusion that the casino is rigged?

A 28 step progression on 8 numbers takes you to 2.7 Standard deviations, that happens all the time. Even a dozen/column can go to 30 spins without a hit, where you not aware of this?

43 spins without a hit is 3.4 Standard deviations, not so common, but it happens.

It never ceases to amaze me that people are willing to put their hard-earned money on the line on the basis of what someone tells them, without doing their own research.  :(
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

superman

Quotethose days i was still playing Rng and did not realize they were rigged

Not having a dig mate but just because you lost doesn't mean it was rigged, it's getting boring now that people blame RNG for their losses, as Bayes said the SD is nothing unusual, it WILL also happen on a live wheel at some point, its just that RNG shows it to you much faster.

Random is the culprit not the platform
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

maestro

you do fast spins on rng so it has to be that win//lose happen faster..and numbers you play are not all numbers..look for 8,9,11,12,16,17,18,19,20,21,26,27,28,29,30,31 :thumbsup:
Law of the sixth...<when you play roulette there will always be a moron tells you that you will lose to the house edge>

Robeenhuut

Quote from: maestro on Mar 06, 04:46 AM 2012
you do fast spins on rng so it has to be that win//lose happen faster..and numbers you play are not all numbers..look for 8,9,11,12,16,17,18,19,20,21,26,27,28,29,30,31 :thumbsup:

Where did you get this sequence?
I wont play in this casino
Matt

downthehatch

Quote from: Bayes on Mar 06, 02:33 AM 2012
So let me get this straight; the progression busts and you come to the conclusion that the casino is rigged?

A 28 step progression on 8 numbers takes you to 2.7 Standard deviations, that happens all the time. Even a dozen/column can go to 30 spins without a hit, where you not aware of this?

43 spins without a hit is 3.4 Standard deviations, not so common, but it happens.
It never ceases to amaze me that people are willing to put their hard-earned money on the line on the basis of what someone tells them, without doing their own research.  :(
Hi
i think when i used this system the other year i was much less aware of flaws in systems, also i dont have the maths skills of other folks on this forum

but arn't rngs programmed in such a way to beat such systems anyway?

Cheers Dth

superman

Quotebut arn't rngs programmed in such a way to beat such systems anyway?

RNG random does not need telling to beat you, randomness alone does that.

There may be dodgy RNG casinos but think for yourself, if they had to programmed for every method we come out with their programmers would be busy all day all week all year, IF they wanted to take/steal your bankroll they would just program a simple if statement, something like

if player bank has increased by 20%

check placement of next bet

return number NOT COVERED by bet

But I can tell you with all honesty, they dont need to do anything like this, random can cope fine all on its own, an easy test for this is take a coin and a handfull of chips, use a marty and bet heads or tails see how long it takes for YOU (as you flip the coin) to steal all your chips OR better still, let the wife/girlfriend flip the coin, you track on a piece of paper the outcomes and bet as you want, follow the last, same as last, I can guarentee you will lose eventually.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

monaco

my mate went to put £500 on Liverpool to beat Anzhi last night at the local William Hill, advertised price was Evens - they rang it through & told him, 'you can have £200 at Evens, & £300 at 5-6!'


When he questioned it saying the advertised price was Evens, they just said take it or leave it.. A$$holes!


Anyone ever come across this before? I've never heard of it.. should've gone to PaddyPower anyway, was 11-10.



Twisteruk

When I used to do horses, with good success I had my bets restricted. Coral were the worst. I would ask for a bet each way and they would say win only at sp. Had a few accounts closed. Betfair was all that was left lol
Its Set In Stone =)

Johnlegend

Quote from: monaco on Oct 26, 07:38 AM 2012
my mate went to put £500 on Liverpool to beat Anzhi last night at the local William Hill, advertised price was Evens - they rang it through & told him, 'you can have £200 at Evens, & £300 at 5-6!'


When he questioned it saying the advertised price was Evens, they just said take it or leave it.. A$$holes!


Anyone ever come across this before? I've never heard of it.. should've gone to PaddyPower anyway, was 11-10.
Paddy Power and Betfred are the best people to bet with online. Incidentally Betfred and William Hill share the shave roulette live feed in Latvia. But ive never had any suspicious behaviour from betfred. They are as fair as any live B&M casino I have ever played at.

monaco

Quote from: Twisteruk on Oct 26, 03:01 PM 2012
When I used to do horses, with good success I had my bets restricted. Coral were the worst. I would ask for a bet each way and they would say win only at sp. Had a few accounts closed. Betfair was all that was left LoL


I've shown him Betfair, but he thinks online gambling is for the young 'uns!


He's usually strictly forecasts on the horses at lunchtime, & a hotbox on the dogs to see him through the afternoon  :)   

-