TwoCat's 24 numbers test.........

[TwoCatSam]

Hello

What started out as a joke has peaked my interest.  I'm finding that if I pick any 24 numbers on the carpet and just let the "auto" feature run, it will usually quickly win 100 or lose 100.  Seems like it is winning more than losing.  If you could set the robot to stop and 100 or -100 it would be great!

Time will tell.

24 number test 1

[Drazen]

Dear two cat if I may propose suggestion about similar idea.


To play on last 24 unique numbers, crossing last one and adding newest by same principle as they are coming.


+2 -1 is progression.


Actualy this is bet from F_LAT_INO called "winning roller coaster" if memory serves me well.


C mon picking any 24 numbers randomly would be profitable only for JL-s who has tamed random LOL


Regards


Drazen

[TwoCatSam]

Drazen

I appreciate what I am doing makes no sense--and I may be only seeing an illusion.  I'm not make any statements:  I use "seems" statements.

I also know this flies in the face of my position that "Hit and Run" won't work.

If I could win, I would eat every word I've ever written, eat crow, kiss the Blarney Stone and whatever else it took--within reason; not selling my soul--to do so!

I will certainly look at what you wrote.  I'm off to the Indian casino and the Italian restaurant.

Thanks

Sam

[justanothergambler]

Uncle Sam! you rock !
why dnt you just bet 24 times number 24 , its a beautiful number and actualy it comes often after number 22

[TwoCatSam]

Up another 100

Now at +200

[TwoCatSam]

Dear two cat if I may propose suggestion about similar idea.


To play on last 24 unique numbers, crossing last one and adding newest by same principle as they are coming.


+2 -1 is progression.


Actualy this is bet from F_LAT_INO called "winning roller coaster" if memory serves me well.


C mon picking any 24 numbers randomly would be profitable only for JL-s who has tamed random LoL


Regards


Drazen

Drazen

Over the years I have alleged that certain numbers cause others to come.  I sat and watched BV for around 500 spins today and I was amazed at how many times the 22 and 24 came within 15 spins of each other.  Also the 22 and 22 and 24 and 24.  They seem to be connected to each other and themselves.

I will add the to my collection of "Voodoo" roulette numbers.  Soon I will have a cauldron full and I can conjure up the Devil!!   

Sam

[Still]

It looks like Gamlet talked about this several years ago.  He talked about the number 36, and how Pascal calculated some relatives, which will often show up after a 36, within some window of opportunity, like 15 spins or something.  See here:

link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=5337.30

It looks like you were aware of it back in 2008 and had already made some tweaks to Gamlet's ideas and tried to apply them to G.U.T: 

link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=4335.msg27715#msg27715

Would be interested to see how this test turns out.  Are some inside numbers better than others?  Is the Snake better or worse than others?  Dunno.   

[Robeenhuut]

It looks like Gamlet talked about this several years ago.  He talked about the number 36, and how Pascal calculated some relatives, which will often show up after a 36, within some window of opportunity, like 15 spins or something.  See here:

link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=5337.30

It looks like you were aware of it back in 2008 and had already made some tweaks to Gamlet's ideas and tried to apply them to G.U.T: 

link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=4335.msg27715#msg27715

Would be interested to see how this test turns out.  Are some inside numbers better than others?  Is the Snake better or worse than others?  Dunno.

Hello Still

Gamlet theory was never fully explained neither by him or his followers. If you can explain it here
please do so.

Regards

[Still]

Hello Still

Gamlet theory was never fully explained neither by him or his followers. If you can explain it here
please do so.

Regards

In my brief overview the number 36 was important for reasons not explained.  And for some reason, there are a few other numbers that like to be near 36 because they are related somehow...because Pascal said they were according to some calculations not explained.  What i gathered from his sketchy explanations, you could wait for a #36 to show.  Then, if none of it's related numbers showed (or only one) within the next 12 or 15 spins, then, for the next 15 spins you could bet on them showing up.  He listed what numbers those were, which may have also included the numbers 1 and 10.  That's a summary.  You'd have to check the link and get all the dirty details but that's about it as far as i could tell.  It means you can flat bet and come out ahead...if it's true. 

[Robeenhuut]

In my brief overview the number 36 was important for reasons not explained.  And for some reason, there are a few other numbers that like to be near 36 because they are related somehow...because Pascal said they were according to some calculations not explained.  What i gathered from his sketchy explanations, you could wait for a #36 to show.  Then, if none of it's related numbers showed (or only one) within the next 12 or 15 spins, then, for the next 15 spins you could bet on them showing up.  He listed what numbers those were, which may have also included the numbers 1 and 10.  That's a summary.  You'd have to check the link and get all the dirty details but that's about it as far as i could tell.  It means you can flat bet and come out ahead...if it's true.

I checked d thread already and what you posted here basically sums it up 
You can only guess what he really meant.

[Still]

I checked d thread already and what you posted here basically sums it up 
You can only guess what he really meant.

Yes it does! But i rechecked anyway and here's what more i've got...

There are 8 numbers that like to be around 36:  0,13,26,31,35,36 and also 1 and 10
The first six were supplied/calculated by Pascal.
The latter two were supplied/calculated by Gamlet.
After a #36 shows, there will be a 30 spin window that's divided into two parts.
In the first 15 spins after #36, if there is none (or only one) of the listed numbers above showing up, then you could bet all through the next 15 spins, on all eight of the numbers listed. 
If none of those numbers showed up, you'd be out/down 8 x 15 = 120 units. 
Gamlet said that is practically impossible, and virtually guarantees a minimum of three hits. 
You need 4 hits to come out ahead, since each hit will pay 35 to 1. 
So 4 x 35 = 140 units.  Need to average 4 hits per play. 

In a way, this is a little like counting cards.  Gamlet is suggesting there will be a window of 15 spins where there will be a lot of hits, if there was none or only one in the first 15 spins after a #36 showed. 

That's about it.  However, Gamlet said there were other numbers, which, when combined with 36 (consecutively ?), would yield other combinations of numbers to trap in various windows of opportunity like just described above.  Did not elaborate in that thread.

 

[Robeenhuut]

Hello Still

There is also other system by Gamlet based on sector play.

link:://vlsroulette.6.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=147

Regards

[Still]

Hello Still

There is also other system by Gamlet based on sector play.

link:://vlsroulette.6.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=147

Regards

Thanks Robeenhuut, i'll check it out and report  back here.   

[carpanta]

Gamlet theory was never fully explained neither by him or his followers. If you can explain it here
please do so.

Time ago I wasted a year or so with Gamlet and other guys trying to discover some kind of connection among numbers inside Sun Square. The queen was Numeris Titanus.  Gamlet the prince. And us dumb knights.

Nothing could be proven despite Numeris' one thousand ways to NOT catching up with numbers associations.

All nonsense. I better know it now.

Regards,
Carlos.

[Robeenhuut]

Time ago I wasted a year or so with Gamlet and other guys trying to discover some kind of connection among numbers inside Sun Square. The queen was Numeris Titanus.  Gamlet the prince. And us dumb knights.

Nothing could be proven despite Numeris' one thousand ways to NOT catching up with numbers associations.

All nonsense. I better know it now.

Regards,
Carlos.

Thanks Carlos.  I ran in d meantime some numbers on 2 Gamlets systems. One with 36 as an anchor and other with 9 numbers sectors. You got of course some hits but overall not consistent enough.

Regards