EC, No Trolling

[albertojonas]

db6000 spins used 4 testing random Vs random with one static rule and lightning conductor.

Next posts show first 250 spins

[albertojonas]

Red


L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L


WINS = 43
LOSSES = 47


Filtered LW registry (Attack once After a L): Wins =21 / Losses =13

[albertojonas]

Black




L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W


Wins = 48
Losses = 44


Filtered LW registry (Attack once After a L): Wins =19 / Losses =12

[albertojonas]

Odd


L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L


Wins = 50
Losses = 44


Filtered LW registry (Attack once After a L): Wins =20 / Losses =12

[albertojonas]

Even


W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W


Wins = 48
Losses = 36


Filtered LW registry (Attack once After a L): Wins =22 / Losses =7

[albertojonas]

HIGH



L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L


Wins = 44
Losses = 54


Filtered LW registry (Attack once After a L): Wins =18 / Losses =18

[TwoCatSam]

How'dja do it?  How'dja do it?

[albertojonas]

LOW


L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L


Wins = 49
Losses = 38




Filtered LW registry (Attack once After a L): Wins =13 / Losses =13

[albertojonas]

AFTER 250 spins


Results:
[attachimg=1]

[albertojonas]

How'dja do it?  How'dja do it?

random Vs random with one static rule, "lightning conductor" and reduced bets.
This reffers to what EGO exposed on the other thread and is just one way of applying it.
As i mentioned before i used to play this with great success.
Ego also suggests Humble progression or Fibbo.
I like to filter LW registry...

[attachimg=1]


I can not find anything much simpler or much better than this.

[Robeenhuut]

Hello Alberto

Your results r cool but few hundreds spins wont make me a convert.  Make it 100+ sessions and we can draw some conclusions.  Sorry but im always doubting Thomas here 
Thanks 4 an input.

Regards

[albertojonas]

Hello Alberto

Your results r cool but few hundreds spins won't make me a convert.  Make it 100+ sessions and we can draw some conclusions.  Sorry but I'm always doubting Thomas here 
Thanks 4 an input.

Regards

I show this and you do whatever you want with it. It is for free.
Unless you want me to work for you...
I am not advocating this will never loose but i did not see anything better than this, did you?

Depending on your bankroll, you can play this in B&M casinos 'till the rest of your life.

[Bayes]

Hi Al,

Ya reckon this is better than the Marigny method?

For me, it's not so important that it wins flat betting, in fact if you factor in the zeros (15 of them) the result is pretty much even. The important thing is to keep the variance low, and this does SEEM to do the job, although as RH says, the sample is too small.

Thanks for your efforts. 

[Robeenhuut]

If i had really something better i would post it Alberto  Lets give it some more time. 

[albertojonas]

Hi Al,

Ya reckon this is better than the Marigny method?

For me, it's not so important that it wins flat betting, in fact if you factor in the zeros (15 of them) the result is pretty much even. The important thing is to keep the variance low, and this does SEEM to do the job, although as RH says, the sample is too small.

Thanks for your efforts. 

Not better than Marigny, but has a nice fluctuation.
Zeros were accounted in play not ignored. They counted as a Loss...
If one puts the LW registry into P&F charting results are even more impressive =)


this is LW registry for the next 250 spins
results for RED


[attachimg=1]


Filtering results with the P&F charting, would give us the following Results:
lwl:wwlwlwllll:lwwlwlwl:lwwlwlwwll:lwwlllll:lllwllllwwlwwll
wwlwl:wllwwlwwllwwlwwlwlwlwl:ww

Wins= 59
Losses = 45
the above is to play after a simple indication until in plus flat bet.
Just to mention that raw results would have been: W=82  L=101 =)



They are posted here, so if you wanna try it and add types of bets with the charts, you are more than welcome. It would be very nice to add it to this, if you have the time...
Also i am curious on how u use the charts.

thanks 4 Everything Bayes.