Mach 3 - A Dozen System

[buffalowizard]

My latest creation:


I will keep it as simple as possible: Track 3 dozens and write them in a row lke:


2 3 3


Then for the next row, we are betting for the furthest back dozen to hit, in this case
it would be dozen 1.


3 1 


In the above example, we'd have won on the second bet.


Now track a new row of three.


2 2 1


So we would bet for dozen 3 to appear in the next row.


1 1 2


That's a loss at stage 1.


Now we do not go chasing the 3rd dozen because we all know it
can go missing for a long time, so we wait for it to reappear.


2 1 1 


Still hasn't appeared, keep waiting.


2 3 2


See it has appeared in this row, so now we bet for dozen 1 as
it is the furthest back.


1


Win first time....etc


Progression


Stage 1:   1 1 2
Stage 2:   2 2 4
Stage 3:   5 5 10


Here is a run down of an actual session, laid out how I do it:
I hope you'll apreciate the impressive hit rate.


1 3 3
3 2      W
1 3 1
2         W
3 3 1
3 3 2   W
2 1 3
1 3 2   W
3 3 3
1         W
3 3 3
1 1 2   W
3 2 3
3 2 3   L
1 2 1
2 1 2   L
1 2 3
1        W
3 3 1
2        W
2 1 2
2 1 3  W
3 1 1
2        W
2 3 3
2 2 3  L
1 2 2
3        W
2 2 3
3 3 3  L
2 3 2  <no bet, waiting for 1 to reappear
3 2 2  <still no bet
2 2 1  <there it is, this is now our trigger row
3        W boom first time
2 3 1
2        W
2 2 2
1 2 2  L
2 2 1
2 1 3
2        W
2 3 1
3 1 2  W
1 2 2
1 3     W
2 1 2
2 1 3  W
2 1 3
1 3 3  L
1 1 1
2 3 2
2 2 1  W


All questions welcome - more testing to be done!


BW

[TwoCatSam]

2 3 2


See it has appeared in this row, so now we bet for dozen 1 as
it is the furthest back.

You are speaking of the 3.

George

Hope you don't take this wrong.  Many people take my questions wrong.

OK, you were betting for the 3 and it didn't come.  Then you waited for it to come and then bet for the 1, as it was furtherest back.

Why wait for the third dozen to appear at all if you are going to bet on the furtherest back anyway?

Sam

[vile]

Why wait for the third dozen to appear at all if you are going to bet on the furtherest back anyway?

Sam
[/quote]

Well you asked so I don't have too.
Thanks Sam for doing my work.

[GLC]

2 3 2


See it has appeared in this row, so now we bet for dozen 1 as
it is the furthest back.

You are speaking of the 3.

George

Hope you don't take this wrong.  Many people take my questions wrong.

OK, you were betting for the 3 and it didn't come.  Then you waited for it to come and then bet for the 1, as it was furtherest back.

Why wait for the third dozen to appear at all if you are going to bet on the furtherest back anyway?

Sam

Since you directed this question to George and that's my name, I'll attempt an explanation for BW.


The system is based on betting for the furthest back to hit.  Since 3 was the furthest back we bet for it to win.  We only bet for it for 3 times, 1-1-2.  If we lose we must wait until there is a new furthest back dozen which means we have to wait until the 3 finally hits.  Once it does, we will have a new furthest back dozen, in this case the 1 dozen.  Now we bet on the 1 dozen to hit.


It seems to me that the reason we wait until the 3 dozen hits before we bet again is that it remains the furthest back and we know that a dozen can sleep for as many as 30+ times.


Once a dozen is furthest back, we only risk 3 bets on that dozen and then wait for a new dozen to be furthest back and risk as much as 3 bets on that one.


I don't know why we only bet 3 times unless BW has determined that the hit rate is better doing it this way than betting for the furthest back to show within 9 spins.


If it has such a good hit rate, I don't understand why he doesn't use a progression that fully recovers all losses with any win.


1 1 2
2 2 4
5 5 10


results in a loss on a win at 4 for the win points


1 1 1
2 3 4
6 9 14


results in a win or break even on every win point.  It does cost 9 more units if you should lose at all 3 levels, but that shouldn't be a deal breaker since you will be winning more units overall on the wins.


BW,  if I'm off base here, sorry.


George

[atlantis]

Hi BW, GLC
This reminds me a little of THE ZONE except you waited for 4 misses on the dozen and then bet 4 times...
A.

[TwoCatSam]

George

Don't know why I addressed the post to you.  Think I'm losing what little mind I have left.

Thanks for your answer.  I disagree with the logic behind the explanation, but this idea is as good as any.

I pretty much disagree with everything.  Even my own ideas.

Sam

[buffalowizard]

Hi guys.

George is spot on with his explanation.

I will test this amongst other ideas in due course. what I liked about it is that the dozens you bet pn are constantly changing and not fixed.

Also i suck at progressions so only used a modest one. To be honest I believe progressions to be quite a personal thing and each to their own really.

BW