Some ideas on table layout betting. (Subject modified)

[falkor]

Great, we can shake hands on that then! You can suggest an equal punishment for me if it loses...

[atlantis]

Yes - I think it worth waiting a little longer for the final edition (or should that be first edition?) of the 'complete system', whatever it turns out to be named.
I am sure the progressions falkor talked about will be figured out pretty quickly too soon afterwards when the system mechanics are firmly established.
I, like others, are anxiously looking forward to and awaiting a proper and full explanation + rules of play, preferably with some real play examples of charting and betting included so as to avoid confusion and misunderstandings creeping in during testing.

Regards,
A.

[RFMAXX]

bye

[falkor]

Azim, what is your understanding of the rules so far?

[atlantis]

How do we start off playing? That would be a good place to begin... 

A.

[Turner]

Azim....
Quit with the shouty upper case typing and demands.
If you want to leave then leave but do it quietly.

Falkor
I dont see a reason to keep mentioning what you think of Winkel or GUT. Keep it to yourself.
Now..   sort some method out with rules that folks can understand. People like Atlantis and others still seem interested but are growing bored. Im very bored with this post.

[iggiv]

Azim, i hear you but unfortunately i can't go against the will of others here and delete the thread. Quite a few people will be upset.

[falkor]

Azim, I can't reiterate all the rules now just for the benefit of those who haven't been following the topic, but I will promise to document it in full (perhaps start a new website) after system completion on New Year's Day - how does that sound?

[RouletteGhost]

The controversy is the fact that falkor posts in depth details and analysis of things with no explanation of what he is doing exactly.

[falkor]

There isn't a great deal of data coming through for DS 3 because most of the bank breaking sets that can occur during 270,000 games have already been eliminated at the DS 1 and DS 2 check points.

The rules are a little complex at the moment, though they could be simplified given more data or more simpler groupings. And there's a less than 1% chance of encountering one of these sets anyhow. I'll leave it how it is for now until after New Years Day when we can look at simplifying and see how it affects the profits.

Spin # < 22
Open = 3

Spin # < 17
Open = 1,2 or 3

Spin # = 11
Open = 0 or 1

Spin # < 10
Open = 0

That should leave less than only a handful of problem sets for DS 4 or DS 5 (to be eliminated next test). I might also generate 1 mil from random.org just for peace of mind.

[RFMAXX]

 
great. than you can post the system as a christmas gift 

[iggiv]

Falkor, simple question. How long time do you need to publish your rules? Can we make it this way? You make some people very angry.
It's not good for the forum. I have a dilemma here. If i delete this thread i will make some people angry. If i leave it like this others will be angry.

Now let's make some compromise to keep peace here. How long time do you need to publish your results? Can you see that this thread so far is moving nowhere? You just publish your numbers, does not make sense.

[falkor]

Will be completed New Year's Day! 

[RFMAXX]

Will be completed New Year's Day! 

cant wait. great 

[iggiv]

OK. So let's take it as a promise. Fail or win, you will publish your rules by the New Year. Oki-doki man?

Will be completed New Year's Day!