P.A :PREACHING about HG!

[atlantis]

This also about same if we play B/R, O/E,H/L, at the same time , *****with a trigger*****.
Each bet selection, will produce variance, no doubt. But the variance will diluted , off set by the other two bet selection.

Thus when a clustered win, happen, u win with flat bet.
And if by chance. when the three have the VARIANCE together, u get killed...hehehe,
Thus a variance avoidance , a must, in whatever strategy u had.

This is nothing new...
What kind of *****trigger***** you exactly proposing??

A

[denzie]

@Ozon. .. i got -4 on that example. And stay away from WH
And we're talking about a MILD progression.  You think Labby is mild?

And if you waited the vwin .....
And a trigger.....

Well that wouldn't lost a single unit isn't it?
When the storm is over we not run outside. First we look if it's safe b4 we go. 

[P.A]

Hi Atlantis, Ray,
Thanks for your reply.

The "Tom", is just an illustration, on how u 'see' and plan, the betting strategy...,
how to wait for variance avoiding.

I dont know how long a B&M record, for FTL, maybe someone could tell.

Btw FTL, not a stable bet selection...it will swing widely,

it may exciting as u will see, many streaks of variance losses,

and then, 'within math' sequences.
and bet accordingly .

If u wait for 10absolute losses, and then bet, then 22 losses, will cause a cut loss session.
But then if u apply,
'variance acvoidance=stop-at-4streaks-loss',
then u only lose 4bet...

Every bet selection, will have a streaks that IMPOSSIBLE to bet, that a hurtful truth, and thus 'cut-loss' strategy...

The "track 3 EC at the same time",
espoused by Bleep,[trigger=two hit, bet for third hit, series bet],
or maybe Priyanka,
are quite interesting, maybe u could do some testing programme to see how the winning streaks,and variance streaks hit.
Thanks.

[denzie]

Im starting to like the swings...as i said...what goes down goes back up  in roulette.......   ALWAYS

[atlantis]

Hi Atlantis, Ray,
Thanks for your reply.

The "Tom", is just an illustration, on how u 'see' and plan, the betting strategy...,
how to wait for variance avoiding.

I dont know how long a B&M record, for FTL, maybe someone could tell.

Btw FTL, not a stable bet selection...it will swing widely,

it may exciting as u will see, many streaks of variance losses,

and then, 'within math' sequences.
and bet accordingly .

If u wait for 10absolute losses, and then bet, then 22 losses, will cause a cut loss session.
But then if u apply,
'variance acvoidance=stop-at-4streaks-loss',
then u only lose 4bet...

Every bet selection, will have a streaks that IMPOSSIBLE to bet, that a hurtful truth, and thus 'cut-loss' strategy...

The "track 3 EC at the same time",
espoused by Bleep,[trigger=two hit, bet for third hit, series bet],
or maybe Priyanka,
are quite interesting, maybe u could do some testing programme to see how the winning streaks,and variance streaks hit.
Thanks.

I see. Ok - thanks.

The "track 3 EC at the same time",
espoused by Bleep,[trigger=two hit, bet for third hit, series bet],
or maybe Priyanka,
are quite interesting, maybe u could do some testing programme to see how the winning streaks,and variance streaks hit.
Thanks.

I have an idea bout series bet with all 3 EC which I'll test later. Yes- might be interesting to try that.

Regards,
A.

[atlantis]

Im starting to like the swings...as i said...what goes down goes back up  in roulette.......   ALWAYS

Hi denzie,
No back to back shockers then yet, denzie? 
A.

[P.A]

Hi Atlantis,

That '22streaks', of variance ,
is very important....[most headache] ISSUE!

at last u 'see' this problem...

[Wait if anyone will comment of that.]

It is 2 short variance 'back-to-back'!!!

And of course, they will kill u...if u jump in.

Some members know about this,
and they say nothing...[for why should they?]

Think hard.,,and u may reduce the risk,
as we cant predict variance, but just watch it come and go...

[Chrisbis]

I see 'it' too.
Anyone who has played this game knows about 'back to back' losses due to extreme variance.

Variety of bet selection could be the answer! !? 

[denzie]

Hi denzie,
No back to back shockers then yet, denzie? 
A.

For sure I've got them...but those are small losses ^^

[P.A]

RayManz make an excellent graph chart, in another thread..Hope he dont mind I paste them here, and hope he could explain to us, about his finding . Thanks RayManz.

===============================
Ofcource it doesn't. Every EC has his own variance or fluctuation.

I made three graphs of the same bet.

1. RB
2. HL
3. OE

The graph is made on bets. I just track per W or L.
Per 10 bets i check how many W's i have and put that in the graph. So every new bet is a new ratio of W and L of the last 10 bets. This way you can see the variance easy.

[RayManZ]

RayManz make an excellent graph chart, in another thread..Hope he dont mind I paste them here, and hope he could explain to us, about his finding . Thanks RayManz.

===============================
Ofcource it doesn't. Every EC has his own variance or fluctuation.

I made three graphs of the same bet.

1. RB
2. HL
3. OE

The graph is made on bets. I just track per W or L.
Per 10 bets i check how many W's i have and put that in the graph. So every new bet is a new ratio of W and L of the last 10 bets. This way you can see the variance easy.

Nothing to explain here. The graphs speaks for itself. You can see the W's go up and go down. Some moments you have 9 out of 10 bets a WIN. Sometime you only have one WIN in 10 BETS.

You just start betting when a EC goes up and stop when it goes down. Yes you will lose, yes you will miss some action. But you will also miss lots of losing. With the right progression this could be a winner.

[P.A]

Thanks RAY!!!
That chart is what I try to do, but, since I have little schooling in computer, I cant do it.

PLEASE do a 20spins, 30spins, 50spins.
[very important!!!!!!]
we could see better.

THANKS, Thanks, thanks!!millions THANKS!! RAY...

[RayManZ]

Thanks RAY!!!
That chart is what I try to do, but, since I have little schooling in computer, I cant do it.

PLEASE do a 20spins, 30spins, 50spins.
[very important!!!!!!]
we could see better.

THANKS, Thanks, thanks!!millions THANKS!! RAY...

I dont see why spins are importent. Maybe i should have stated i used the betting method of bleep.

So wait for 2 RED and then BET RED.

If i would graph the spins you would see alot of no action. It not about the spins but about the bets. Atleast that's my opinion.

[P.A]

With that CHARTS ALONE,
all the expert will EUREKA!EUREKA!EUREKA!
but dont run out naked like Archimedes...hahahaww

as the Chinese say,
A picture worth a thousand words...
and borrowing this phrase..

"A CHART WORTH A MILLION POSTINGS!!!"

seems that I nearing concluding my preach, after all...

That charts, nearly concluded my preach here,
to impart knowledge.

as my English pathetic...hehehee,
and after many acrimonious, enmity, and scoldings by members.

I nearly give up, and then this chart..
Phew...
save by a chart...hehehee...

I think, [no, not I think],

it definitely
summed up, what I want to say, after all this while...

thanks RayManZ

[P.A]

I dont see why spins are importent. Maybe i should have stated i used the betting method of bleep.

So wait for 2 RED and then BET RED.

If i would graph the spins you would see alot of no action. It not about the spins but about the bets. Atleast that's my opinion.

Do u mean that the graph will be boring small up and down wave???

Then PLEASE post them here, so we could see, and EUREKA!