• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

KTF

Started by nottophammer, Jan 30, 11:56 AM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

nottophammer

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Apr 05, 01:41 PM 2016
Does anyone think flat betting 11th spin only and switching terminals has any merit?

RG i seldom look at links,but in the avg doc betting for the 11th non-hit has hit 1st spin 79 out of 101 games. Would it be better going for the 11th non-hit instead of just spin 11
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

RouletteGhost

Quote from: nottophammer on Apr 05, 01:56 PM 2016
RG i seldom look at links,but in the avg doc betting for the 11th non-hit has hit 1st spin 79 out of 101 games. Would it be better going for the 11th non-hit instead of just spin 11

Thanks notto

I will download excel viewer to view
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

psimoes

Notto, your reasoning makes sense. There are always more unique numbers that won´t repeat any sooner. The problem is you´re therefore betting on too many numbers. A loss and it gets difficult to recover.

I explaned how I see this method on post #244 IIRC.

I got the Loothog definition now: when they say the longest gap between two winning numbers is say 14, there were in fact 13 losing numbers between them. They count the second winning number as a gap (confusing). So when they say 22 it´s 21, when they say 10 it´s 9 and so on. Which means the numbers to bet for plus their longest gap must total 37+1.

So 27 + 10 = 37 : still one wheel pocket short.




[Math+1] beats a Math game

psimoes

Ooops. Got caught by the law of large numbers again. Ran more tests. No longest gap big enough to totalize the 37+1. Sorry friend, this won´t work. It´ll succumb to the house edge.  :(
[Math+1] beats a Math game

RouletteGhost

Quote from: nottophammer on Apr 05, 01:56 PM 2016
RG i seldom look at links,but in the avg doc betting for the 11th non-hit has hit 1st spin 79 out of 101 games. Would it be better going for the 11th non-hit instead of just spin 11

The one ktf bust you did have, what was different from the others? Besides the repeats. Any red flags to check for?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

psimoes

@ Nottophammer

Maybe my conclusions were premature. Wait 6 uniques and bet 31 against. Try that. Flat bet.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

tuddilue

Quote from: psimoes on Apr 05, 03:20 PM 2016
@ Nottophammer

Maybe my conclusions were premature. Wait 6 uniques and bet 31 against. Try that. Flat bet.
@psimoes

One bet and stop or start betting with KTF rules? Just curious..

psimoes

This doesn´t foresee what happens if you bet on a rolling basis. There are of course the back to back repeaters. If you´re supposed to win right on the first spin then all the numbers hitting would have to be unique. Need coffee. As I see it, if the simulations for what they´re worth were done right, there should be "one terrible loss"every 100000 spins. But if you stumble on an early repeater, you should recover six spins later.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

psimoes

Quote from: tuddilue on Apr 05, 03:47 PM 2016
@psimoes

One bet and stop or start betting with KTF rules? Just curious..

Bet and stop I´d say. The other KTF rules seem arbitrary IMHO.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

tuddilue

Quote from: psimoes on Apr 05, 03:52 PM 2016
This doesn´t foresee what happens if you bet on a rolling basis. There are of course the back to back repeaters. If you´re supposed to win right on the first spin then all the numbers hitting would have to be unique. Need coffee. As I see it, if the simulations for what they´re worth were done right, there should be "one terrible loss"every 100000 spins. But if you stumble on an early repeater, you should recover six spins later.
Isn't it recover 5 spins later?
6+7+8+9+10=40
Maybe I also need coffee  :wink:

RouletteGhost

So your saying wait until theres 6 numbers unique that have NOT repeated. Then bet the remaining numbers. One time. ?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

nottophammer

 psimoes
Did you look at the attachment in reply 856, know idea where this 6 uniques come from.
Repeats is the other topic
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

psimoes

Quote from: tuddilue on Apr 05, 04:00 PM 2016
Isn't it recover 5 spins later?
6+7+8+9+10=40
Maybe I also need coffee  :wink:
Yeah something like that LOL.
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Apr 05, 04:06 PM 2016
So your saying wait until theres 6 numbers unique that have NOT repeated. Then bet the remaining numbers. One time. ?
Yep

This is  fascinating. According to the simulations, the longest gap for 35 numbers is 5 exceeding the total of 38 by 2. So, does this mean if you wait for 4 uniques then bet 38 against the last two you´ll actually have an edge over the house in the course of 100000 spins? WOW...

Test ppl, test

Edit - corrected the numbers.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

RouletteGhost

Quote from: psimoes on Apr 05, 04:20 PM 2016
Yeah something like that LOL.Yep

This is  fascinating. According to the simulations, the longest gap for 35 numbers is 5 exceeding the total of 38 by 2. So, does this mean if you wait for 5 uniques then bet 38 against the last three you´ll actually have an edge over the house in the course of 100000 spins? WOW...

Test ppl, test

If thats the case start another thread

1) that'd be fascinating
2) lets respect ktf

I will test
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

psimoes

Attention, I edited my post: bet wait 4 uniques, bet agains the last 2.


Yeah its at the verge of hijacking the thread. Better start a new one.

@Notto yes I read the attachment. See my reply in post #822. That´s my reasonings.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

-