• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Progression bets are nothing more than different size bets on different spins. You could get lucky and win big, or unlucky and lose even more.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Flat Earth theory questions

Started by Steve, Feb 19, 06:56 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

It's conclusive evidence

On the shore line you can only see the top half of Toronto

Case closed.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

falkor2k15

In response to Steve...

Yeah, it would be nice if you started trying to debunk all the evidence, but better still if you watched the 2017 docu and saw the bigger picture, i.e. the trees amongst the forest.

Again, it's not the right time for you to be asking questions. You haven't looked at all the evidence and there's no point me writing out paragraphs based on what's already explained conveniently in the video.

We aren't debating whether God exists or not; we aren't speculating about the nature of Earth; we are discussing a conspiracy that over turns 500 years of previously accepted trust in our government and authorities.

And I would remind everyone to pay close attention to the movies:


There's a reason why the most popular flat earth videos contain no references to movies and why 911 documentaries likewise made no reference to movies for up to 10 years after the conspiracy.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

It comes down to my word against your word

Except your word is a bit ridiculous

Steve hit it on the head with the flat earth pic and the globe pic

This is between YouTube videos from whackos and reality

Reality: viewing Toronto from buffalos shores and the skyline being hidden partially by the curvature

Whackos: rockets hitting a fake firmament which has no bearing
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Blue_Angel

Quote from: thelaw on Mar 07, 02:22 PM 2017
Believes he has proof the earth is flat...............but doesn't understand sarcasm. :lol: :lol: :lol:



I've a question for you mr ''the law'', have you seen many grails around this forum?

RouletteGhost

From the flat earth discussion group in Facebook. See picture

Like I said, retards

Sorry

I call a spade a spade

These people are stupid

Like, how can I put this. Oh I know: too stupid to insult

Don't believe me? Join the group. See what these Einstein's have to say

They grasp the intelligence of Neanderthals


the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Still

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Mar 05, 10:29 PM 2017
It's strictly an internet, living in moms basement, lacking logic movement

The more I stay in the flat earth group observing the lunacy on Facebook the more I see insane logic

They use rail guns as proof. Direct line of sight. Not understanding the technology at all

They know so much that isn't so. Period.

Probly none of them ever took an "Earth Science" class like I did community college.  Too many scientists know too much.

Still

Quote from: falkor2k15 on Mar 07, 03:40 PM 2017

Watch the docu first then move on with your life and start studying Cycles so you can beat Roulette...  :thumbsup:

See here is where your presumptuous nature shows itself, and bogs down everything you touch.

You don't know if cycles work, or how they would work if they did.

Likewise, your presumptions about the shape of the consenses perception we call "the globe" will also die under big data.  Youtube vids are not big data, but rather, a prime way to control the opinion of the watcher...like CNN...on a smaller scale.

Steve

Falkor how many videos do I need to waste time on to conclude there is no valid proof?

At what point do I declare that I wont waste more time?

Referencing drawn pictures and lines from movies is not proof. Checking with a powerful zoom lens is a bit more like proof, and the results show curve. How do you explain it?
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

falkor2k15

Quote from: Still on Mar 08, 11:24 PM 2017
Probly none of them ever took an "Earth Science" class like I did community college.  Too many scientists know too much.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

falkor2k15

Quote from: Still on Mar 08, 11:37 PM 2017
See here is where your presumptuous nature shows itself, and bogs down everything you touch.

You don't know if cycles work, or how they would work if they did.

Likewise, your presumptions about the shape of the consenses perception we call "the globe" will also die under big data.  Youtube vids are not big data, but rather, a prime way to control the opinion of the watcher...like CNN...on a smaller scale.
Making assumptions is a sign of stupidity.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

falkor2k15

Quote from: Steve on Mar 08, 11:45 PM 2017
Falkor how many videos do I need to waste time on to conclude there is no valid proof?

At what point do I declare that I wont waste more time?

Referencing drawn pictures and lines from movies is not proof. Checking with a powerful zoom lens is a bit more like proof, and the results show curve. How do you explain it?
Sorry, Steve, I really can't help you anymore. The truth is in plain sight. How can you not see the obvious... don't tell me you're a shill? You know Priyanka never hacked your game. You probably know the earth is flat too....
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

There is no hope for you on this matter
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Steve

"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

RouletteGhost

Circumnavigation proved to be a tricky thing for flat earthers to explain

What is the compass explanation from the flat earth theorists?

You call Steve a shill but as the days pass no one can be this serious on this issue so maybe you are the shill

We're the north and south poles artificially made by elites to fool us? So we could have compasses? So that when circumnavigating this happens:

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

The flat earth model doesn't make sense. It has the sun rising in Africa and then going across Europe which as we know does not happen


So as I said before they know so much that isn't so
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

-