0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Moxy

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 425
  • Rated: +9
Im offering it for a few reasons. Including but not limited to a genuine offer to buy a non exclusive licence, and plain putting my money where my mouth is. There's more though.

The hg would need to decode the nature of reality. That doesn't mean crap like the law of a third.

Also I don't need the hg or any system. So my motives are different to what people might think.

You are something else.   You know deep down how lucrative it is.  On the flip side, everyone else is oblivious in their blissful ignorance.

It's quite bizarre actually.

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 6873
  • Top Bloke
  • Rated: +501

pepper

  • 50+ posts Member
  • **
  • 90
  • Member
  • Rated: +3
What is someone's "holy grail" results in a net win of just $1 after the 2 million spin test? It looks like they would still be entitled to the $100k.

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 6873
  • Top Bloke
  • Rated: +501
In that case I wouldn't be interested. They can keep their hg. But I've clarified it by requiring a 1% resulting edge.

*

ignatus

  • 3000+ Posts Member !!!
  • Matrix Co Ordinator
  • 6870
  • "I am that I am"
  • Rated: +391
Had to test another system now, that i coded/tested today (lasted about 150 000 spins before crash)... betting every spin, (without a trigger--inside bets, tablelimit 1-200)...
If you like to donate http://paypal.me/ignatus1

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve


*

Steeefan2014

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 263
  • Member
  • Rated: +16
If it crashes, it never worked.

I guess you realize that's a dumb thing, right?  :twisted:

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 6873
  • Top Bloke
  • Rated: +501
Exactly what's "dumb"?

If you mean my comment, you're not understanding it.

A systems don't "work for a bit then lose, for some reason". Success is not short-term variance.

*

Steeefan2014

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 263
  • Member
  • Rated: +16
You're right! Success is betting every spin at a table, 24/7 for almost 4 years (calculated at aprox 60spins/hour/live dealer) and at the end to be profitable with aprox 1mil units!

Or the option 2: buy a roulette computer!

RouletteKnight

  • 50+ posts Member
  • **
  • 88
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: 0
You're right! Success is betting every spin at a table, 24/7 for almost 4 years (calculated at aprox 60spins/hour/live dealer) and at the end to be profitable with aprox 1mil units!

Or the option 2: buy a roulette computer!

Your system hasn't passed 2 million spins? If it has you can claim the 100k from Steve already.

*

Steeefan2014

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 263
  • Member
  • Rated: +16
Your system hasn't passed 2 million spins? If it has you can claim the 100k from Steve already.

Nope, I can't!
1. it doesn't bet every spins
2. I don't know which is the winning target that will satisfy Steve (nobody does)
3. His offer is way to low to compensate my strategy

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 6873
  • Top Bloke
  • Rated: +501

RouletteKnight

  • 50+ posts Member
  • **
  • 88
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: 0
Nope, I can't!
1. it doesn't bet every spins
2. I don't know which is the winning target that will satisfy Steve (nobody does)
3. His offer is way to low to compensate my strategy

Well, I do believe there is some winning system. I too have something similar.
But the term "winning" is subjective because roulette is largely random and no one knows what can ever happen with 100% certainty.

On a side thought, there is a sure fire way to win applying Parrando's Paradox. Most people are stumped on how to apply this principle but I have figured it out. But you first need a sucker to side bet with you in the casino. Say for example, you bet with him $50 that after an end of the roulette session you will be up in profit. If you lose, you will lose all your bankroll plus set aside $50 for him, if you are still in profit he has to give you $50. Of course there should be a minimum number of played spins say 300-400 that you have to bet at least 1 unit

Most people can have a high win rate and be in profit in a few hundred spins using systems. So this is actually a positive edge play for you even though mathematically both games has a losing edge.

RouletteKnight

  • 50+ posts Member
  • **
  • 88
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: 0
Well, I do believe there is some winning system. I too have something similar.
But the term "winning" is subjective because roulette is largely random and no one knows what can ever happen with 100% certainty.

On a side thought, there is a sure fire way to win applying Parrando's Paradox. Most people are stumped on how to apply this principle but I have finally figured it out. But you first need a sucker to side bet with you in the casino. Say for example, you bet with him $50 that after an end of the roulette session you will be up in profit. If you lose, you will lose all your bankroll plus set aside $50 for him, if you are still in profit he has to give you $50. Of course there should be a minimum number of played spins say 300-400 that you have to bet at least 1 unit

Most people can have a high win rate and be in profit in a few hundred spins using systems. So this is actually a positive edge play for you even though mathematically both games has a losing edge.

Kairomancer

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 222
  • Member
  • Rated: +31


Share via delicious Share via digg Share via facebook Share via linkedin Share via reddit Share via stumble Share via twitter

 

Popular pages: