Subscribe for more free professional tips.

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ross

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 264
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +20
Steve - If someone came up with a system which satisfied your requirements
what would you do with it? 
Eighty- four and counting.  Is age an excuse?

*

Moxy

  • 500+ posts Member
  • *****
  • 577
  • THE MONSTER WHO KILLED EASTER
  • Rated: +17
Steve - If someone came up with a system which satisfied your requirements
what would you do with it?

Steve is a shrewd, successful, highly motivated business man.  Your non-exclusive agreement for 100k from him would not apply to him if he were to ever turn around and look for a buyer's market with a potential exclusive agreement in contrast.

This is all hypotheticals.

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 7165
  • Top Bloke
  • Rated: +530
I've said it many times now. I'd use it myself, and if safe to do so, code it into software so others could use it in a profit-sharing arrangement. Just as I've done with my remote hybrid roulette computer.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

precogmiles

  • 500+ posts Member
  • *****
  • 861
  • Member
  • Rated: +65
Steve, in regards to the system you were winning with for a year before it failed, were you using a progression?

*

Steve

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • 7165
  • Top Bloke
  • Rated: +530
Yes it was a basic progression, with reset when progression reached the limit. There were a few variations of it, especially when it started losing.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

precogmiles

  • 500+ posts Member
  • *****
  • 861
  • Member
  • Rated: +65
Yes it was a basic progression, with reset when progression reached the limit. There were a few variations of it, especially when it started losing.

That makes sense, variance always catches up when you use progression.

*

boatran8

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 199
  • Rated: +1
Hello Steve,

Do i fulfill your requirements ?
If the prerequisites are fulfilled I'll proceed into coding it with RX and initiate the 100k challenge procedure.

Amount bet : 34473 over 107 621 spins (playing only one dozen per round played).

Net result : +2181 units.

Flatbet only, no guessing.

Max dd 64 units.

Here is the excel graph