• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Possible winning method to test for Nick MSI

Started by andreib1986, Apr 27, 02:38 AM 2019

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anastasius

How many rs spins did u test

I played before just spins 24 to 28 flat and good result also
Boom boom sir

ozon

I played 25 session . Each 24 spins plus betting  spins.

ozon

+118 units  , its  really very good result using  flatbet.
Have couple sessions without betting.

Anastasius

So unhits from spin 24 to 28 flat?

I was adding any new that qualifyed also between so at spin 26 if one had unhit for 24 spins it was added....anyway it won and only missed all 4 betz a few times. ..

So u track 24 from ur evwn and odd stream  then bet unhits from 1 of the streams with most hits?  For 4 spins flat ?
Boom boom sir

ozon

I didnt add numbers , played only  that  didnt show in 24 spins, till win or 4 spins stop lose.

Anastasius , Yes , unhits  from one  stream , odd or even.

andreib1986

Quote from: ozon on May 09, 01:18 PM 2019
A very interesting topic
It's really worth having someone do simulations
I know that this is a strategy intended for a real wheel, but I have simplified it. To fix it on RNG.
I create 2 streams
Even and odd
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
and so on ...

And we play it according to the rules of the strategy
4 spins flat till win, after 24 spins
If the average of hit is real 2.6 spins, we have a very strong system.
I played several sessions on RS and the results were very good.
Unfortunately, I do not believe in RS simulations, because in my opinion it works like casinos play mode, almost every strategy wins at first, only after some time the results seem real
I would not play in any progressions

I dont think random is an understandable concept, because time resets with every new spin, yet on long term the probabily always reaches its pottential.

Firefox

Quote from: andreib1986 on May 09, 07:49 PM 2019
I dont think random is an understandable concept, because time resets with every new spin, yet on long term the probabily always reaches its pottential.

Time resets every spin - this is true.

But the numbers reach their potential only within certain parameters.

For example over a million spins the standard deviation on a 1/37 number is 162. Commonly, numbers are within 2 standard deviations of the mean 95% of the time.

But this still means a hot number can lead a cold one by 648 occurences even on a 2 SD max deviation.

Over a billion spins the SD is 5,128 so one number could be ahead of another by 20,000 occurences and both are still within 2 SD of the mean.

So the concept that numbers will catch up to the mean in the long term, which is the basis of many systems is not going to help.

They may stay behind and remain behind by hundreds and thousands of spins but statistically, this is quite normal within certain limits.

This explains why playing sleepers or unhits does not offer an advantage.

andreib1986

Yes, but playing hot numbers and assuming streak will continue will not lead to any advantage either,  so I prefer to stay with the cold ones.

Steve

Cold numbers are exactly the same as hot numbers with respect to profitability, with the only exception being heavy bias.

What you said is like saying "I don't believe in betting colors, but I bet black".
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

andreib1986

I know, I'm sorry it sounded like that. Its just that I want to believe random can be beaten.

Steve

I want to never pay tax. But I don't think it's going to happen.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

andreib1986

The only thing that needs to be added to the method is when is the right time to "loose" or not to bet and that can be done with statistical data.

Anastasius

Started missing too many 4 bet sets...

what u think is max that it can miss after 24 wait. I saw it go even past spin 36.with no hit.
Boom boom sir

andreib1986

Quote from: Anastasius on May 10, 04:31 AM 2019
Started missing too many 4 bet sets...

what u think is max that it can miss after 24 wait. I saw it go even past spin 36.with no hit.

I know it can miss.  It is normal to miss. I dont think the author played enough games to state that it didnt loose a game, but I think the main ideea its good. It just needs some triggers, a target win, some progression and maybe 2 or 3 different bankrolls levels, depending on standard variation of the sistem. But untill we see at least 100 000 spins we can not make any statement. It doesent matter if its RNG or not, in my oppion random it still random no matter if its a real wheel or not. It must only be <fair>.

andreib1986


-