• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

System based on Law of the third-need comments

Started by Drazen, Apr 26, 12:39 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hermes

I am wondering how can you expect 3/3 law of roulette on RNGs? Non-sense. RNGs are artificial numbers sets no coming from nature's laws which roulette have to obey. I even don't believe that RNGs know what is Law of Thirds!
Wake up and don't be lazy to test it on live roulette spins.
The 3/3 law of roulette says that in 37 spins 1/3 comes more often then average, 1/3 comes around average and 1/3 sleepers have to yield to the bully.
In the next 37 spins only 1/3 of the previous eg. 12 sleepers comes. Now use a math and always 1/3 will appears. You can see the process on streets, double streets even dozens and columns but with less numbers the 1/3 law will be less transparent and exact.
Hermes

ophis

Quote from: Hermes on Jun 12, 05:48 PM 2011
I am wondering how can you expect 3/3 law of roulette on RNGs? Non-sense. RNGs are artificial numbers sets no coming from nature's laws which roulette have to obey.

Well because RNG are suppose to emulate Random... and proper RNG will give you numbers according to law of the third. If not they would be revived as false and not really random.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

warrior


Hermes

RNGs simulate nature not replace. The sum of all parts is not the whole, remember that! Something missing?
Right warrior!
Hermes

ophis

yes but even slot machine need to have equal distribution..... if not then honest commission wouldn't approve it as random.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

ophis

Quote from: Hermes on Jun 12, 06:01 PM 2011
RNGs simulate nature not replace. The count of all the parts is not the whole, remember that! Something missing?
Right warrior!
Hermes

Ok listen. I never said that RNG is good or anything similar.
I do not trust RNG.

BUT real RNG SHOULD follow law of the third to be valid.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

Hermes

Ophis, where did you see an honest casino, please give me the address!
Slot machines slaught the retarded.
Hermes

Bayes

Ophis is correct. There's a lot of talk about RNG vs Actuals, but the truth is a fair RNG will produce  the same distributions of any group of numbers that a wheel will.

I challenge anyone to identify a stream of RNG generated numbers; if there were two sets of numbers posted, one from an RNG and one actuals, how many would be able to pick out the RNG? my guess is it would be 50:50.

Any takers?  8)
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

ophis

Quote from: Hermes on Jun 12, 06:05 PM 2011
Ophis, where did you see an honest casino, please give me the address!
Slot machines slaught the retarded.
Hermes

I didint say iv seen honest casino. I never was bothered to examine if casino is honest.

and slot machines are another form of lottery.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

ophis

Saying that RNG are bad is like saying ALL Germans are bad because Nazism were bad.....

tbh casinos don't even have to bother about cheating in o RNGs because most of people are losing anyway.... that's enough to make big money.

Thats why roulette is still here from 300+ years. And appearance of RNGs didint change any ods of winning for players.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

broadsword_uk

Hi Ophis,

Yes no argument with that although trying to play progressions on 3 dozens at the same time with a progressive stake can put the bankroll under more stress than it needs.

Just betting on 4 unhit numbers for example in the last dozen after we have had more like 50 spins seems to enable us a hit before the bets get too high... well so far anyway.

Ian :-)

ophis

Quote from: broadsword_uk on Jun 12, 08:36 PM 2011
Hi Ophis,

Yes no argument with that although trying to play progressions on 3 dozens at the same time with a progressive stake can put the bankroll under more stress than it needs.

Just betting on 4 unhit numbers for example in the last dozen after we have had more like 50 spins seems to enable us a hit before the bets get too high... well so far anyway.

Ian :-)


Well try t play it flat bet. ;)

and more numbers you bet more chance You have to hit.

i really have done some test on that system because I do like it. I like how using man made borders we make law of the third work better for us. but testing it... it was losing because it was trying to bet on 3 numbers that left for many spins 100+... and this was the reason of drawdowns.

that's why iv made a option to limit minimum amount of numbers to bet on.

anyway if you like progression so much setup Min profit per dozen on 1 unit this way progression will rise slowly. also setup max units to bet on something that suits you. like 10 units... per number.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

ophis

Anyway this system beats pattern breaker and all that similar funny bets on its head.

I would like to see some other systems to be based on this system because this really have the reason to be winning.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

warrior

Quote from: Hermes on Jun 12, 06:01 PM 2011
RNGs simulate nature not replace. The sum of all parts is not the whole, remember that! Something missing?
Right warrior!
Hermes
i agree

ophis

Quote from: Hermes on Jun 12, 06:01 PM 2011
The sum of all parts is not the whole, remember that!

that doesn't make sense. "Whole" of what? Sum is not whole. Sum is the operation of combining a sequence of numbers. Whole can refer to Holism, - the idea that all the properties of a given system cannot be determined or explained by the sum of its component parts alone.

Anything that have happen on live wheel can happen on RNG and other way around. You can't prove something that can't be dis proven.

You can predict where the ball will land on real wheel - so its not that random.... you can't do that on RNG.
Prove that RNG is fake... or that live wheel is not fake.... live wheel is more fake than RNG because on live wheel you have factors like place of the ball, its speed,direction of movement and so on. so Real wheel is less random than RNG.

You can calculate where the ball will land on live wheel. You cant do that on RNG.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

-