Don't ever chase any particular bet. It is bound to harm you in long run.

[albertojonas]

it is unbeatable. the systems that we have are only going to beat them a little. they can't be played in a live casino, too much time spent.

except for the kaka system

[warrior]

it is unbeatable. the systems that we have are only going to beat them a little. they can't be played in a live casino, too much time spent.

they are beatable they are not CONQERABLE

[mimoto]

I do find your last post somewhat negative, you have posted over 1000+ and you still think roulette can not be beaten!!!!! (or can be with dice)

Why are you here?

Are we not all here to share positive information about roulette?

Do you not talk / share information with your friends about roulette.

Am sure that all of us  here that play alot, know about the wait 5 dozen bullshit, £10 of ebay.
You should have know that wont work and told your friend about it.

Be positive albalana

[frost]

it is unbeatable. the systems that we have are only going to beat them a little. they can't be played in a live casino, too much time spent.

My f non system beat 1000+ live spins continuously. These spins were provided by albalaha himself. I think they were the first 10 screenshots.

Everything is possible in roulette.

If this were true that would make the game perfect and all of us fool for wasting years and valuable time in this forum.

If you saw 30 reds and then started beating you would NOT lose.

JL had the right idea with his systems.

Ask random to do something it cannot do. Here is where the key to beating roulette lies.

[mimoto]

The key to beating roulette is to study it!!!!!

If you spent as much time studying roulette as you spend working for a living, do you think you would be any better at it? The answer would be yes, as in anything.

Day 1 of you learning to paint, your paintings wiil be shit, 5 years of painting and you may be able to sell one and proud of it. (to become good at anything you need to put in some time and that is the problem with todays people) we all want the quick fix with no effort.

Its the same with all that you study. the more you get to know the game the better you will be.

If people spent as much time testing roulette as people do watching television, (ie) mindliss media depression.  (visual chewing gum) you may have a better chance at beating it.

It is after all a man made game, and everything man invent, man beat.

positive thinking.


.

It is all in the way of your thinking.

If your glass is always half empty, then give up now as you have the wrong approach

No bettter money on earth than free money!!!!!

Never give up people, its man made.

[Colbster]

A system that has shown short-term disadvantage (ie. is currently losing) is not due to recover in the future, because every single spin going forward is random and subject to the exact same odds as those that have been already completed in the past.  I disagree with the notion, however, that there are no identifiable advantages to be had.  My bet method, the Eggleston Betting Method,  which is a dynamic rather than static bet, shows that you can have the odds mathematically in your favor.  I have not found a vehicle by which to implement the system consistently, but the math is irrefutable.

link:://rouletteforum.cc/roulette-and-gambling-framework/the-eggleston-betting-system/

Focus on the math, not the bet selection, and you will see that it is beatable without having to sneak computers into casinos are look for a table with a messed up leg.

[Fripper]

If you saw 30 reds and then started beating you would NOT lose.

JL had the right idea with his systems.

Ask random to do something it cannot do. Here is where the key to beating roulette lies.

So, if you see 30 reds and start betting with a martingale or whatever on black for 10 spins. Do you think it's impossible to see 41 reds?

What can't random do?

[albalaha]

Hey Guys,
       Concentrate on the current debate of "advantages or disadvantages of a fixed bet" only. Those who have nothing to talk about this particular topic, please stay away. Please do not argue whether roulette itself is beatable or not. I think bet selection is far more important than progression and those who forgot this aspect, lost big. Secondly, Martingale sort of progressions are proven failure even if you start playing after Red appears 50 times in a row. This type of thinking is escapist approach to play roulette. There is absolutely no limit on how many times something may recur and nothing can be said about EC bets which has 18 choices (numbers) to fall into. First understand randomness before thinking what it can do or not. There is nothing like patterns in roulette and if there are, we can not predict which pattern is emerging and how long will it remain. So think rationally. Dynamic bets as Carpanta said or Random pick as I am saying (e.g. dice method) can be an approach to have your bets to safeguard ourselves from long losing streaks in case we have a fixed EC bet.

[MrJ]

Which particular bet has advantage over other? Either dare to speak with logic and proof or don't poke your nose in every topic of mine.

Not arguing with you sir but posts like this are odd. What is your favorite method to play and WHY? Why play that method if everything is the same? Thats like being on a movie forum but a person HATES movies, makes no sense.

Ken

[Gizmotron]

Hey Guys,
      Concentrate on the current debate of "advantages or disadvantages of a fixed bet" only. Those who have nothing to talk about this particular topic, please stay away. Please do not argue whether roulette itself is beatable or not. I think bet selection is far more important than progression and those who forgot this aspect, lost big. Secondly, Martingale sort of progressions are proven failure even if you start playing after Red appears 50 times in a row. This type of thinking is escapist approach to play roulette. There is absolutely no limit on how many times something may recur and nothing can be said about EC bets which has 18 choices (numbers) to fall into. First understand randomness before thinking what it can do or not. There is nothing like patterns in roulette and if there are, we can not predict which pattern is emerging and how long will it remain. So think rationally. Dynamic bets as Carpanta said or Random pick as I am saying (e.g. dice method) can be an approach to have your bets to safeguard ourselves from long losing streaks in case we have a fixed EC bet.

Man, you are one strange cat. Now you are trying to control discussion on an internet forum. You also said this: "First understand randomness before thinking what it can do or not." Then you lay down your opinion of randomness. I wonder if you are willing to discuss that? Here it is again: "There is nothing like patterns in roulette and if there are, we can not predict which pattern is emerging and how long will it remain. So think rationally."

Look, this is the same old mathboyz argument. They always get stuck on prediction. You can see something emerge into view and see how long it continues to exist. You can do this irregardless of seeing it in the entrails of an owl or in some crystal ball. If I see a stretch of reds that lasts for seven spins I didn't have to see it coming a week ago in a vision. If that string continues to fifteen in a row then I'm a rich SOB. It only takes one right bet to take a chance on it. It has nothing to do with prediction. It has everything to do with trial and error. You test to see if you are in a winning streak. It's like merging into lanes on the freeway. You merge into winning conditions. You certainly wouldn't go to a fortune teller to figure out how to do that would you?

[albertojonas]

Hey Guys,
        I think bet selection is far more important than progression and those who forgot this aspect, lost big. Secondly, Martingale sort of progressions are proven failure even if you start playing after Red appears 50 times in a row. This type of thinking is escapist approach to play roulette. There is absolutely no limit on how many times something may recur and nothing can be said about EC bets which has 18 choices (numbers) to fall into. First understand randomness before thinking what it can do or not. There is nothing like patterns in roulette and if there are, we can not predict which pattern is emerging and how long will it remain. So think rationally. Dynamic bets as Carpanta said or Random pick as I am saying (e.g. dice method) can be an approach to have your bets to safeguard ourselves from long losing streaks in case we have a fixed EC bet.

i agree with all of that except highlight parts

on first you are implying  that there are bet selections.

i agree that random vs random is a good way to approach the nature of the game.

i ignore the part when you say stay away from this thread. you wrote it for discussion wright?

Respect,
AL

[albalaha]

Dear Alberto,
           there is a difference between bet selection(which can be static or dynamic) and selecting a fix bet for entire session. I am just trying to say that chasing a particular bet blindly coupled with dangerous progressions like martingale always prroves fatal at the end. You may remain unaffected by its evils for a few sessions but at last it will take away whatever you have earned or even more.

[carpanta]

Look, this is the same old mathboyz argument. They always get stuck on prediction. You can see something emerge into view and see how long it continues to exist. You can do this irregardless of seeing it in the entrails of an owl or in some crystal ball. If I see a stretch of reds that lasts for seven spins I didn't have to see it coming a week ago in a vision. If that string continues to fifteen in a row then I'm a rich SOB. It only takes one right bet to take a chance on it. It has nothing to do with prediction. It has everything to do with trial and error. You test to see if you are in a winning streak. It's like merging into lanes on the freeway. You merge into winning conditions. You certainly wouldn't go to a fortune teller to figure out how to do that would you?

I absolutely agree with Gizmotron's post. For those starting to play roulette whose mind is not already contaminated with misleading math theories last Giz's statement should be printed and keep it handy to remind randomness behavior can be matched with a watchfull eye.
Trial an error is the strategy to play roulette. It implies one has to especulate with roulette outcomes but in a smart way.
Example if you see red EC chance is dominating for the present time and inside this chance low numbers are prevailing over high numbers you can put into play those 9 numbers (red/ low) for no more than 3 spins. Why? Because if outcomes prove you right, the trend continues, then you'll have a hit in that gap and then you can try again same bet for next 3 spins and so on.
The moment you fail to have a hit on your betting event inside that stipulated 3 spins, you stop playing and wait for an event of your choice doing well again to apply same strategy.
For a six numbers event you'll do the same but for 5 spins because that is its positive frecuence.

So no prediction required, just speculate with a trial an error strategy is the key to track and bet on random events. Timing and continuity are the real parameters to mesure randomness behavior. Then use the right tools for that purpose.

Cheers,
Carlos.

[albertojonas]

Dear Alberto,
           there is a difference between bet selection(which can be static or dynamic) and selecting a fix bet for entire session. I am just trying to say that chasing a particular bet blindly coupled with dangerous progressions like martingale always prroves fatal at the end. You may remain unaffected by its evils for a few sessions but at last it will take away whatever you have earned or even more.

now you made your point sir.

[MrJ]

  Quote:    Sent by albalaha on June 09, 2011, 11:00:16 pm     
Which particular bet has advantage over other? Either dare to speak with logic and proof or don't poke your nose in every topic of mine.
 
   

Not arguing with you sir but posts like this are odd. What is your favorite method to play and WHY? Why play that method if everything is the same? That's like being on a movie forum but a person HATES movies, makes no sense.

Ken