The SLAP strategy

[Realplayer26]

1
3
3 bet line 3
2 still bet only 3
5 still bet only 3
4 still bet only 3
1 now 1 and 3
3 3 line wins, leave bet on line 1
4 now bet 1 and 4
1 1 line wins, leave bet on line 4 and so on

maybe realplayer have some more ideas

Yes i have ideas and not only ideas also some practical soluttions which teoreticaly must work, more or less always.
Basick idea of all mine teory is this - say you played some amount of spins, here no mater acordingly which method you played. In the end you have some result - lets say you play on some groups of numbers like theese sixlines ans you have distributtion of hits in them say 10-9-6-5-3-3, so some most hited sixline is hited 10 times , second 9....

Here naturaly best way of play was such, which prevent us from beting on 5 and 6th group and push us on betting 1 and 2th group.

So main task is to find way of play that after some time of play we will find that we played in more or less best way....

[RFMAXX]

Hey guys. Could you please Post the Spun numbers of your Losing Sessions?
I want to recheck Them with my tweak. It Never lost so far. Yesterday i was in a dutch casino
And had a hit on the First bet. Then we Cash Out and had a Nice meal in the Restaurant. Thank you atlantis

[Realplayer26]

I can point weakest point of all that strategy and the same as most of strategies-

that is that you use as groups of numbers what is on the board - sixlines, streets, dozens....

The best way is to count direct numbers and from them, if want , to create groups himself.

So to use not what rules sugest, but  create himself.

[Turner]

I can point weakest point of all that strategy and the same as most of strategies-

that is that you use as groups of numbers what is on the board - sixlines, streets, dozens....

The best way is to count direct numbers and from them, if want , to create groups himself.

So to use not what rules sugest, but  create himself.

Google translator?
Not doing a bad job.....

I agree that the way to bypass the long sleeps could be to creating groups from "what just happened" rather than the "few" on the carpet.

[RFMAXX]

My tweak has nothing to do with the Original idea. Thats why i am Interested of the numbers from your losing Sessions. As i Said: no losing Sessions Till testing...won Within Spin nr 11 to 16.
Please Post some numbers. Thanks.

[Realplayer26]

Google translator?
Not doing a bad job.....

I agree that the way to bypass the long sleeps could be to creating groups from "what just happened" rather than the "few" on the carpet.

Sorry not understand your minde ?

[Realplayer26]

The main moment is this :
Say we have some miracle glasses, we look to roulette and see that some numbers are simply wider than others, so they have biger chances to get ball.
What logick is then to bet lines or dozens ? No logick. We must bet theese numbers which have more chances to be hited.

So we must do our own group of numbers....

[atlantis]

Hi realplayer,

Interesting thoughts to consider.

Thanks,
A.

[atlantis]

My tweak has nothing to do with the Original idea. Thats why i am Interested of the numbers from your losing Sessions. As i Said: no losing Sessions Till testing...won Within Spin nr 11 to 16.
Please Post some numbers. Thanks.

Hi RFMAXX,
Great news you found a tweak to use that seems working good for you.
Here is earlier losing string found by BuffaloWizard.

BW's Original losing string:

1  2   5   1   5   6   4   4   2   6    5q >   3   1q   4q   3   3q   (16 spins reached here)  -34u LOSS

Regards,
A.

[RFMAXX]

Thank you atlantis but i Need the numbers, not the ds. 

[Realplayer26]

Hi realplayer,

Interesting thoughts to consider.

Thanks,

What really is most important for player who use some kind of progressions ( i not say that to use progressions is good way, anyway ), is that he will not get long loosing stream.
Or say to know how long that stream can really be. Here no matter maybe in the end we will not have chance to win even if the end is sucessefull.
So here when we split numbers to some groups, not like casino or rules sugest us - we are more free and we can choose way which even mathematically can give us better chances.

Because of that i say - we must look to sequence from the end and look how often we betted on right number or on right group of numbers.

This way we can determine if our strategy have chances for wining or not.

[atlantis]

Thank you atlantis but i Need the numbers, not the ds. 

I haven't had much time today - but I cannot seem to find a losing string of NUMBERS to give to you just yet!!
Seems like nobody else can either so far...
But then that is surely good news - yes? for it shows the STRENGTH of Slap! 

Care to share your tweak idea anyway? I am all ears.

Cheers,
A.

[MrG]

I haven't had much time today - but I cannot seem to find a losing string of NUMBERS - yet!!
Seems like nobody else can either so far...
But then that is surely good news - yes?! 

Care to share your tweak idea anyway? I am all ears.

Cheers,
A.

I'm curious with what way of playing you can't find losing string of numbers?

[atlantis]

Hello RFMAXX,

By "losing spins" do you mean a string of 16 without any line hitting four times?

A.

[Rewster88]

Atlantis,

im testing it a few days now with good results. When adding the separate line rule(separate progressions) it busts. So I think we maybe better test it with the gold old rules and see how many times a losing sessions shows and then compare it with the winning ones. The problem with the separate progressions is that you still get a sleeping DS that kills the bank. Im on spin 30 an DS 6 doesn't show up.

lets see if im doing it right..