P.A :PREACHING about HG!

[denzie]

You have those who go outside before the storm and those who go after....some have more cagones then others...but who gonna live the longest? 

[P.A]

I couldn't showcase all that we could do within the short video, but just so that you know, it is a pure mechanical system run with an automated clicker and a tracker that measures limits of variances and apply an intelligent money management system that combines positive, negative and parachute progressions (not all of these progressions are shown on this video as the situation didn't demand them, will try posting more videos if n1 here is interested.

Dear Priyanka,
Thank u so much!

May u please tell, [about the 18numbers rolling],

How much , is the VARIANCE -LIMIT?

How many unhit , is the VARIANCE -LIMIT?



or, the how long, the
"long losing streaks, with some wins",
is the VARIANCE -LIMIT??
[example, 4hit and 16loses...]

thanks.

[ozon]

Hello, from three days apply the tactics of play.

When I start the game and then waiting for inballance of 10 hits in first 20 spins (let's say 14-4 or 15-5 in the EC bets) then start betting on the side with low hits.
When I start betting use Bayes modification of Hollowey progression, and use of corse Yours safebreaks, after 4 Lose stop and waiting for win this awoid long losing runs.
PA, You mentioned about the  cut the losses, and still I do not know when the cut lose when I am -60 or -200 units. What do you think of such a strategy, whether
it has a chance of success, whether you prefer a longer progressions and still are errors in my reasoning.
Play  with profit target 1  unit for  trigger.

All tests manually BV no zero-RNG

[Tomla021]

I used to play baccarat with an out of  balance of 10 and try to play it flat till the imbalance is -5 .. it won more than it lost .....wish i kept records

[denzie]

I used to play baccarat with an out of  balance of 10 and try to play it flat till the imbalance is -5 .. it won more than it lost .....wish i kept records

Why you stopped?   

[Tomla021]

local casinos dont have scoreboards==so its tough to figure out ,,, i used to play something else until i saw the imbalance

[Priyanka]

May u please tell, [about the 18numbers rolling],
How much , is the VARIANCE -LIMIT?
How many unhit , is the VARIANCE -LIMIT?
or, the how long, the
"long losing streaks, with some wins",
is the VARIANCE -LIMIT??
[example, 4hit and 16loses...]

This forum in itself is a huge body of knowledge. See below:

Here is a sample of some "maximum sleeps":

460 - 540 spins with a straight up not showing. (maths expectancy is a hit once every 37 spins)
309 splits with a split not showing. (maths expectancy is a hit once every 18.5 spins or so)
178 spins with a street not showing. (maths expectancy is a hit once every 12.3 spins or so)
155 spins with a corner(square) not showing. (maths expectancy is a hit once every 4.6 spins or so)
93 spins with a line (double-street) not showing... (maths expectancy is a hit every 4.6 spins or so)
36-40 spins with a dozen/column not showing.(maths expectancy is a hit once every 3 spins or so)
20- 36 spins with any even money chance not showing. (expectancy is a hit once every two spins)
10 numbers may sleep for about 45-55 spins

[winkel]

Will he just become another Winkel?

May I ask, what you want to say by this sentence?

[atlantis]

Hi there winkel,

Y'know I quite wondered what he meant by that too!?

A.

[nottophammer]

yes Law what is meant by that comment.

[ignatus]

seems like people are more interested in drama, than in roulette.

[thelaw]

May I ask, what you want to say by this sentence?

Hey Winkel,

I meant a system that has not yet been proven.

Let's say that someone has an effective system to beat the game. This forum would be a place to discuss and even reveal that strategy.

If, however, they didn't reveal the strategy fully, then we have to ask - "why post at all if not so share?" (with PA we're seeing the problems with this)

I'll use Ignatus as an example. He shows each and every part of his systems including bet selection and progression (if any) used. He also openly answers any questions about said systems, as well as if they have succeeded or failed. Cut and dried!

Beating Roulette using math is scientific, not artistic. This is not a creative endeavor where you should "feel" the fluctuations of a particular spin set.

If we allow people to share only part of a strategy, then we have no proof that it actually works. Which is where we get Kimo, John Legend, and now PA............that is to say, a trip down an endless rabbit hole.

If a member does not want to share their full strategy, that is their right, but it is also my right to call BS with no proof.

Claims without proof are mere speculation.................or 28 pages of entertainment

That being said......if Winkel or anyone else has a successful system, then release it, and we can all become rich and give 50% of our winnings to charity. We could change the world!!!

[probasah]

This forum in itself is a huge body of knowledge. See below:

Quote from: Bayes on November 02, 2010, 12:50:08 PM
Here is a sample of some "maximum sleeps":

460 - 540 spins with a straight up not showing. (maths expectancy is a hit once every 37 spins)
309 splits with a split not showing. (maths expectancy is a hit once every 18.5 spins or so)
178 spins with a street not showing. (maths expectancy is a hit once every 12.3 spins or so)
155 spins with a corner(square) not showing. (maths expectancy is a hit once every 4.6 spins or so)
93 spins with a line (double-street) not showing... (maths expectancy is a hit every 4.6 spins or so)
36-40 spins with a dozen/column not showing.(maths expectancy is a hit once every 3 spins or so)
20- 36 spins with any even money chance not showing. (expectancy is a hit once every two spins)
10 numbers may sleep for about 45-55 spins

Yes, Priyanka, that is exactly what i meant in my previous post. Combine those numbers with what PA is preaching in here, and you will all understand it.

Regards,
Alex

[Turner]

Hey Winkel,

I meant a system that has not yet been proven.

Let's say that someone has an effective system to beat the game. This forum would be a place to discuss and even reveal that strategy.

If, however, they didn't reveal the strategy fully, then we have to ask - "why post at all if not so share?" (with PA we're seeing the problems with this)

I'll use Ignatus as an example. He shows each and every part of his systems including bet selection and progression (if any) used. He also openly answers any questions about said systems, as well as if they have succeeded or failed. Cut and dried!

Beating Roulette using math is scientific, not artistic. This is not a creative endeavor where you should "feel" the fluctuations of a particular spin set.

If we allow people to share only part of a strategy, then we have no proof that it actually works. Which is where we get Kimo, John Legend, and now PA............that is to say, a trip down an endless rabbit hole.

If a member does not want to share their full strategy, that is their right, but it is also my right to call BS with no proof.

Claims without proof are mere speculation.................or 28 pages of entertainment

That being said......if Winkel or anyone else has a successful system, then release it, and we can all become rich and give 50% of our winnings to charity. We could change the world!!!

did you answer "Will he just become another Winkel?"

I dont think so.  Expand a little

[winkel]

Hey Winkel,

I meant a system that has not yet been proven.

Let's say that someone has an effective system to beat the game. This forum would be a place to discuss and even reveal that strategy.

If, however, they didn't reveal the strategy fully, then we have to ask - "why post at all if not so share?" (with PA we're seeing the problems with this)

I'll use Ignatus as an example. He shows each and every part of his systems including bet selection and progression (if any) used. He also openly answers any questions about said systems, as well as if they have succeeded or failed. Cut and dried!

Beating Roulette using math is scientific, not artistic. This is not a creative endeavor where you should "feel" the fluctuations of a particular spin set.

If we allow people to share only part of a strategy, then we have no proof that it actually works. Which is where we get Kimo, John Legend, and now PA............that is to say, a trip down an endless rabbit hole.

If a member does not want to share their full strategy, that is their right, but it is also my right to call BS with no proof.

Claims without proof are mere speculation.................or 28 pages of entertainment

That being said......if Winkel or anyone else has a successful system, then release it, and we can all become rich and give 50% of our winnings to charity. We could change the world!!!

All you are saying is, that you didn´t read my posts. I revealed a "strategy" not a system! And I revealed it in total for beginners. When you also read the flames I got, you will understand, that I didn´t proceed.
And I posted also other systems and always answered any question.

I don´t comment other peoples systems. So please don´t use my name to say to someone else, that he is talking stupid nonsense.

People like you are the reason why other excellent members don´t read and post on forums. I myself mostly just read.
As long as I see that @azim and @nottophammer understood and perform well I´, satisfied. all others especially like you pls l i c k  my rear bottom